Investigation Trump is discrimination

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Comey was a socialist who tried to put Hillary in power and having failed that tried to sabotage Trump by leaking fake news to Washington Post and refusing to tell the public Trump was not under investigation. Trump doesn't hire socialists. So Comey got the boot.

originally posted by: allsee4eye
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Comey was a socialist who tried to put Hillary in power and having failed that tried to sabotage Trump by leaking fake news to Washington Post and refusing to tell the public Trump was not under investigation. Trump doesn't hire socialists. So Comey got the boot.

a reply to: allsee4eye

Trump doesn't hire socialists. So Comey got the boot.

So again it was for political reasons

a reply to: DJW001

He suddenly opened investigation into Hillary a week before election day and a couple of days later said she is innocent. That proves Comey is socialist.

originally posted by: allsee4eye
a reply to: DJW001

He suddenly opened investigation into Hillary a week before election day and a couple of days later said she is innocent. That proves Comey is socialist.

I am a socialist

Let me tell you what comedy did does not make his a socialist

Makes me question if you know what a socialist actually is

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Well, duh. Why do you think Obama hired Comey in the first place? Socialists.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

Socialists believe in high tax and lots of welfare. Conservatives believe in low tax and little welfare.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

i didnt deny it
i asked you for an actual SOURCE

you go right ahead and insult people who support trump

no worries
this bs ,like the election, wont last forever

originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

lots of things COULD happen
good luck with that

you do understand trump did not do anything illegal when removing the fbi director?

If he done it to protect himself or those close de to him being implicated in something criminal then it would be illegal

It is worth noting that that is a "if" that seems to be currently being investigated

And we have had congressional testimony UNDER OATH from those relevant people, guess what they said....jesus and you said you were tired of doing "my research".

a reply to: DJW001

No it really doesnt
what matters is if the investigation was obstructed
there is testimony UNDER OATH to that matter
that testimony does not end well for you

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: shooterbrody

You have this arse backwards.

There is NO thing, action or motion that a President can do for ANY reason he chooses. There are actions he may take for many reasons, but not for ANY reason. For example, if he decides that he wants to launch a nuclear missile at a small, peaceful island nation in the pacific, he may not simply do so. There have to be justifications for it. If he wants to fire the director of an investigative organisation, then sure, that is his right to do... unless the reason for it is that the individual concerned is a threat to the Presidents position and reputation for some reason.

Anyone would think, to hear you talk, that you would have supported Nixon.

After all "When the President does it, that means that it is not illegal!"...right? This is the same damned argument you are making, and it was bogus when Nixon made it. Things may have changed in the world, but that has not.

no you have it wrong
how bout I quote Comey himself for you...
thehill.com...

“I have long believed that a President can fire an FBI director for any reason, or for no reason at all,”

Comey actually knows the law, you however are mistaken.
www.businessinsider.com...

The President has held the power to appoint and dismiss the director of the FBI at his or her discretion since 1968. The current nomination and confirmation process for the FBI director was created by an amendment to the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.

In addition to that and to the obstruction charge I will just leave this quote here as well....
www.telegraph.co.uk...

"There has been no effort to impede our investigation to date," acting FBI director Andrew McCabe told the Senate Intelligence Committee, in a hearing that capped two days of high drama provoked by the dismissal.

Comey,Rogers,Coats,and Rosenstein have all testified similarly.

So yes the potus can fire the fbi director FOR NO REASON or for any reason he likes.

a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin



Even when trump TWEETS he thinks he is under investigation the ignorant, still say he isn't , Um HE SAID IT, no one made the man say it....His tweets that are lies, or like the Comey tapes trying to make the American people think that trump is telling the truth, deflect...he might as well be throwing dogs a ball....they chase it and wag their tails.....woof woof....well I am a free thinker...Again I DID NOT EVER VOTE FOR OBAMA.....I did however watch the right wing sling mud at the man here on ATS, when in all honesty he did a far better job than Bush and Bush Jr.


The whole birth certificate thing here on ATS, went on for 9 years....and of coarse it was not true. He WAS BORN AND RAISED IN THE U.S.

a reply to: allsee4eye

Yeah, i would disagree that garbage men hold public office

a reply to: shooterbrody

But not if doing so is covering up a crime, or to alter the course of justice. The law applies to the President in that regard. So in actual fact, the statement they are supporting, that the President can fire anyone for any reason, IS flawed, as I previously pointed out. If there are any exceptions to a rule, then it is not a rule, but a guideline. What they might have said for clarities sake, is that a President may hire and fire anyone, for any reason, save for when firing them or hiring them, represents a perversion of the course of justice.

a reply to: TrueBrit

source please?

easy enough right....
not just your opinion how about a source

originally posted by: kurthall
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin


The whole birth certificate thing here on ATS, went on for 9 years....and of coarse it was not true. He WAS BORN AND RAISED IN THE U.S.

You do realize, (don't you?) it was Mrs. Clinton who first brought this idea into public discussion when she was running against Obama in '07/'08.

a reply to: allsee4eye

To even ASSUME Trump is a bad man because he never held public office is discrimination.

You really should learn what discrimination means because you clearly don't.

Trump has never broken the law

He did when he refused to rent to blacks and lost in court because of it.

Trump has done the unimaginable. Set records.

He sure has most vacations, fastest drop in popularity yeah records to be proud of.

originally posted by: annabanana

originally posted by: kurthall
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin


The whole birth certificate thing here on ATS, went on for 9 years....and of coarse it was not true. He WAS BORN AND RAISED IN THE U.S.

You do realize, (don't you?) it was Mrs. Clinton who first brought this idea into public discussion when she was running against Obama in '07/'08.

Sure she did and little Trumpy picked the ball up and ran with it didn't he?

originally posted by: allsee4eye
a reply to: DJW001

He suddenly opened investigation into Hillary a week before election day and a couple of days later said she is innocent. That proves Comey is socialist.

So if he had said she was guilty then that would have proven that he was a Conservative? But seeing how he found that she wasn't so he must have held out for a higher dollar amount therefor proving that he is not only a Conservative but a capitalist as well. Funny him and Trump should have been bff's seeing how they have so much in common.