It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Jacobu12
You can't make a plane designed for one thing do another. The Global Hawk is designed for high altitude, slow flight. You can't bring it down to low altitude, make it do a bunch of maneuvers that convince people they're looking at a fighter (again your claim) and fly into the Pentagon at high speed.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Jacobu12
The wheels have EVERYTHING to do with the 20 feet that you keep claiming. How many times does it have to be said that all dimensions relating to height of the aircraft are with the landing gear down, and going from the ground to what's being measured?
The 20 feet 6 inches has nothing to do with the altitude. The fuselage is 13 feet 4 inches tall, and just over 12 feet in diameter.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Jacobu12
At 62,000 feet it can. It's even more fragile than the 757 at low altitude.
So according to this theory, they spoofed the radar data at the airport and made them think that it came in and made a high speed descending turn, let me guess, the C-130 controlled it, so they lied and were in on it too (despite the fact that no one else noticed the significant modifications made to the aircraft or the Global Hawk ground station rolled into it), not one of the eyewitnesses noticed it was actually white instead of silver, and so forth.
There are more holes in the Global Hawk theory than you claim there are in the 757 theory.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Jacobu12
Because. The. 20. Feet. 7. Inches. You. Keep. Quoting. Is. From. The. Ground. To. The. Top. Of. The. Fuselage. That. Means. Wheels. Down. And. Included.
This is why i think the Globalhawk may have hit the Pentagon.
Globalhawk can be guided to the target, it unmanned, precision.. It can carry a payload of explosive material.
As i pointed it out the debris at the Pentagon don't match up with Flight 77.
All good till we see this photograph and we know it was taken at the Pentagon! Notice how narrow the white strip is compared to the red part!
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Jacobu12
Maybe in your eyes it doesn't match. To the rest of us it does. Especially when we understand the differences in the ambient light in the photos.
Why would they measure the wheels if they are down?
originally posted by: Zaphod58
a reply to: Jacobu12
Because they're using the standard measurements for the aircraft that are used in ground planning documents. Just like everyone questioning the events that day uses 44 feet for the tail height, which is also from the ground with the wheels down. The only measurement that matters is the fuselage diameter.
originally posted by: Jacobu12
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Jacobu12
Maybe in your eyes it doesn't match. To the rest of us it does. Especially when we understand the differences in the ambient light in the photos.
lol so silly unbelievable. It don't match up and it's clear as day to anyone who has sense and has commonsense.
originally posted by: InhaleExhale
originally posted by: Jacobu12
originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Jacobu12
Maybe in your eyes it doesn't match. To the rest of us it does. Especially when we understand the differences in the ambient light in the photos.
lol so silly unbelievable. It don't match up and it's clear as day to anyone who has sense and has commonsense.
But sense, be it common or not has nothing to with vision.
People with vision see its the same.
Yes, its silly the nonsense you keep posting.
Why would they measure the wheels, when the plane was flying.