It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: whyamIhere
""Like with an Axe ?"
They have nothing to gain at this point by lying.. and doing it under oath, do they?
Several top Intelligence officials have testified that Russia interfered in the U.S. election. They have nothing to gain at this point by lying.. and doing it under oath, do they?
originally posted by: carewemust
Several top Intelligence officials have testified that Russia interfered in the U.S. election. They have nothing to gain at this point by lying.. and doing it under oath, do they?
originally posted by: KansasGirl
originally posted by: carewemust
Several top Intelligence officials have testified that Russia interfered in the U.S. election. They have nothing to gain at this point by lying.. and doing it under oath, do they?
Right, because it's just that simple. Sure.
originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: carewemust
They have nothing to gain at this point by lying.. and doing it under oath, do they?
As if there is no such thing as a conspiracy.
originally posted by: ColdWisdom
This notion that 17 intelligence agencies corroborated the witch hunt is just blatantly false.
The New York Times has finally admitted that one of the favorite Russia-gate canards – that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies concurred on the assessment of Russian hacking of Democratic emails – is false.
On Thursday, the Times appended a correction to a June 25 article that had repeated the false claim, which has been used by Democrats and the mainstream media for months to brush aside any doubts about the foundation of the Russia-gate scandal and portray President Trump as delusional for doubting what all 17 intelligence agencies supposedly knew to be true.
In the Times’ White House Memo of June 25, correspondent Maggie Haberman mocked Trump for “still refus(ing) to acknowledge a basic fact agreed upon by 17 American intelligence agencies that he now oversees: Russia orchestrated the attacks, and did it to help get him elected.”
However, on Thursday, the Times – while leaving most of Haberman’s ridicule of Trump in place – noted in a correction that the relevant intelligence “assessment was made by four intelligence agencies — the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the National Security Agency. The assessment was not approved by all 17 organizations in the American intelligence community.”