It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Bernie Sanders says to Fight Back in Every Way That You Can

page: 9
43
<< 6  7  8    10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:23 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

Actually, no. Not if you take the time to listen to what he actually said and consider the context.




posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Grambler

Well maybe you should be spreading them cupcakes around a little.

Us liberal Marxist Haters of Freedom like baked goods too ya know.


Oh Im sorry, she doesn't use marijuana in her baked goods, so you hippies wouldn't be interested.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: burntheships

Actually, no. Not if you take the time to listen to what he actually said and consider the context.



Understanding context would be great. More of that please - perhaps the second amendment people could help sort out the context.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

That's a little presumptive don't ya think???

Can't I just enjoy some yummy baked goodies without being accused of some type of self medication???

Do you really think I can't just enjoy a cupcake for being a cupcake now too???

BTW, do you even know who that person you have as your avatar even is and what he represented???
edit on 20-6-2017 by mOjOm because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes

originally posted by: eNumbra
Because I know being honest is hard for you guys, here's the actual statement.


“we’ve got to stand up and fight back. We have got to be involved in the political process in a way that we have never been before, because what is happening in Washington right now is unprecedented.”


What he's saying is quite clear, and only someone purposely attempting to skew it would not understand it.


You left out the ending, "...so Mary, stand up and fight back in every way that you can."

Must have been an oversight on your part, since only someone purposely trying to skew it would leave that off intentionally. Right?

Fair, I did; but since its already qualified by the bolded statement the latter sentence is a redundant re-stating of the first sentence.

Removing it doesn't change the meaning.
edit on 6/20/2017 by eNumbra because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Grambler

That's a little presumptive don't ya think???

Can't I just enjoy some yummy baked goodies without being accused of some type of self medication???

Do you really think I can't just enjoy a cupcake for being a cupcake now too???

BTW, do you even know who that person you have as your avatar even is and what he represented???


Bill Hicks, one of my favorite comedians ever.

What do you think he represented?

I think him and I share many of the same qualities; individuality, contrarianism, distrust of authority, conspiratorial, hatred of nation building wars, a sort of schizophrenic ability to go from peaceful to enraged, being a fan of comedy.

I assume people may say that as a right wing leading person, Hicks would have heavily disagreed with me. Maybe. I don't know or care. I think the real lesson to take from him and another one of my heros in my signature Christopher Hitchens is to be an individual; be contrarian.

In fact, as much as I would have liked to have a beer with either of these two, I would have much rather had an argument with them.

Most of the people I truly respect I heavily disagree with on a lot of issues. I suspect that the same could have been said about what Bill Hicks would think of me.

But I guess who cares; its just a ride.




posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: eNumbra

originally posted by: LadyGreenEyes

originally posted by: eNumbra
Because I know being honest is hard for you guys, here's the actual statement.


“we’ve got to stand up and fight back. We have got to be involved in the political process in a way that we have never been before, because what is happening in Washington right now is unprecedented.”


What he's saying is quite clear, and only someone purposely attempting to skew it would not understand it.


You left out the ending, "...so Mary, stand up and fight back in every way that you can."

Must have been an oversight on your part, since only someone purposely trying to skew it would leave that off intentionally. Right?

Fair, I did; but since its already qualified by the bolded statement the latter sentence is a redundant re-stating of the first sentence.

Removing it doesn't change the meaning.


Well, we will have to agree to disagree on that point. I think it does change the meaning, and says exactly what he meant to say, and spoke around, for most of his response. I believe he wants to promote the violence, while phrasing things in a way that makes him able to deny doing so. My perception, of course, and I know some will disagree.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 04:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
Understanding context would be great.

It would, wouldn't it?


More of that please - perhaps the second amendment people could help sort out the context.

I don't know what you mean. Should I just assume you mean that people who don't agree with you should be hunted down by american militia and executed?
edit on 20-6-2017 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 05:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: UKTruth
Understanding context would be great.

It would, wouldn't it?


More of that please - perhaps the second amendment people could help sort out the context.

I don't know what you mean. Should I just assume you mean that people who don't agree with you should be hunted down by american militia and executed?


Cogitate on it. It will come to you.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 05:04 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

And if it doesn't?

Why don't you just clarify?



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 06:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: Christosterone

Great post - and exactly why no quarter can ever be given to liberals. Those that seek compromise with them will live to regret it -always.





They are the party of peace, after all.

Now where have I heard something like that before? Hmmmm.




posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 08:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler

originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Grambler

That's a little presumptive don't ya think???

Can't I just enjoy some yummy baked goodies without being accused of some type of self medication???

Do you really think I can't just enjoy a cupcake for being a cupcake now too???

BTW, do you even know who that person you have as your avatar even is and what he represented???


Bill Hicks, one of my favorite comedians ever.

What do you think he represented?

I think him and I share many of the same qualities; individuality, contrarianism, distrust of authority, conspiratorial, hatred of nation building wars, a sort of schizophrenic ability to go from peaceful to enraged, being a fan of comedy.

I assume people may say that as a right wing leading person, Hicks would have heavily disagreed with me. Maybe. I don't know or care. I think the real lesson to take from him and another one of my heros in my signature Christopher Hitchens is to be an individual; be contrarian.

In fact, as much as I would have liked to have a beer with either of these two, I would have much rather had an argument with them.

Most of the people I truly respect I heavily disagree with on a lot of issues. I suspect that the same could have been said about what Bill Hicks would think of me.

But I guess who cares; its just a ride.






I always thought it was a weird David Duchovny photoshop.






posted on Jun, 21 2017 @ 01:46 AM
link   
Its true what they say, Marxist Extremists always resort to violence to achieve their ends.



posted on Jun, 21 2017 @ 02:29 AM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone
why are we letting old senile people run the world? r party stole youreriously after your run for president you should have just wandered off to retirement because the dems done showed you as being as strong as a wet noodle. why did you not show this piss and vinegar when the democratic party was caught saying that they were always going to back killary over you all your supporters who donated in effect were swindled.. and one of your backers just went full on stupid and had to be put down.



posted on Jun, 21 2017 @ 07:58 AM
link   
a reply to: tadaman




posted on Jun, 21 2017 @ 09:27 AM
link   
a reply to: 3daysgone

so Bernie should have bought a tiny black fiat instead? He's not allowed to enjoy his hard earned money?

and an audi? ...great choice if you ask me.

bought with donor contributions...c'mon...you know thats a stretch.

Back off Bernie. He's allowed to enjoy his earnings just as every American is allowed to enjoy their earnings. Even if the rich were taxed more...he would still be able to afford whatever car he wants.
edit on 21-6-2017 by veracity because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 21 2017 @ 09:37 AM
link   
a reply to: darkbake



Either the O.P. is trying to troll Democrats, or he is not very smart.


Or both. You nailed it-Sanders was taken completely out of context and it's a growing trend in online journalism these days. If reports had to be independently peer reviewed before release then these "journalists" would be sweating bullets.



posted on Jun, 21 2017 @ 09:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: 3daysgone
a reply to: tadaman



Did a 9 year old make that?

Both left and right take the money and run in the end. Look at George Dubya, he sits back on his ranch raking in millions from taxpayers, a fraction of those taxpayers being family or friends of the three thousand plus soldiers who died in Iraq, not to mention the Iraqi civvies. Obama will enjoy the taxpayer retirement as well so it works both ways.

To paraphrase Homer Simpson "Socialism works, in theory."



posted on Jun, 21 2017 @ 04:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Christosterone

Hahahhaha...so if you wouldn't mind, since you're so enlightened, how is what he said disgusting? No invitation to violence, calm and somber tone. Sounds like you just want to complain. Don't be mad he pointed out facts, someone getting shot doesn't erase the vile and inciteful things the president has said. Get over it. Trump is not everyone's president, sorry

edit on 21-6-2017 by onemoreface because: Accidentally hit send



posted on Jun, 21 2017 @ 04:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: onemoreface
a reply to: Christosterone

Hahahhaha...so if you wouldn't mind, since you're so enlightened, how is what he said disgusting? No invitation to violence, calm and somber tone. Sounds like you just want to complain. Don't be mad he pointed out facts, someone getting shot doesn't erase the vile and inciteful things the president has said. Get over it. Trump is not everyone's president, sorry


I know its very difficult to read a whole thread. But did you see Bwernie comments off of his FUND RAISING email when Gifford got shot, where he claims that merely denouncing violence isn't enough, and people needed to tone down their divisive rhetoric?

So why don't you ask Bernie why he felt this type of language is violent?



new topics

top topics



 
43
<< 6  7  8    10 >>

log in

join