Hillary Told FBI's Mueller To Deliver Uranium To Russians In 2009 "Secret Tarmac Meeting"

a reply to: Grambler

Pretty sure this would've been hailed as the "smoking gun" had this been Trump's doing, some how, some way.

So if I get this right, this exposes Mueller as being another back pocket gold coin for Hillary, for her well known "Pay to play" episodes, which is exactly "what is wrong here". Trump seems to keep letting the mangy dogs in his living room with these kinds of dirt bags.

a reply to: Grambler

I'm looking in to this too, and what I'm coming across throws in conflict diamonds and other means of transporting wealth outside of cash:

Clinton:

The Clinton Administration has worked to create an international diamond trade regime, likely employing certificates of origin, but seeks to ensure that legitimate diamond producers are not hurt by emerging policies.

Anytime the Clintons are interested in something, we know they're also going to find a way to skim/scam/leverage for themselves and cohorts.

Enter Mueller:

During a September 19, 2002 hearing on terrorist financing and implementation of the USA PATRIOT Act before the House Committee on Financial Services, for instance, Robert Mueller, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, called for legislation that would allow for the pre-trial freezing of fungible assets linked to alleged criminal offense, including diamonds, gold and other precious metals, “without requiring strict tracing to the offense.”67

Now, this is years before the uranium thing happens. So now the FBI (under Mueller) wants to have untraceable funds they now have a way of acquiring funding, “without requiring strict tracing to the offense.”

Uranium?

The Al Qaeda network has also been linked to trade in other precious gems, and possibly other natural resources, mined in Africa.28

...

28 A shipment of uranium that may have been mined in the DRC was intercepted in November 2002 in Tanzania; see Mike Mande and Joseph Mwamunyange, “Tanzania, US to Investigate Source of Illegal Uranium,” The East African, November 18, 2002.

leakyplace /wiki/CRS:_Diamonds_and_Conflict:_Bakcground,_Policy,_and_Legislation,_July_16,_2003

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

Mining? Clintons?
Enter Hugh Rodham?

a reply to: Grambler

It may be nothing illegal, but clearly Mueller's reputation has taken a hit.

It doesn't look good to be the guy spearheading an investigation into obstruction of justice of Trump, when you have a working relationship and financial connection with the person who would (presumably) most benefit the impeachment of Trump.

a reply to: Grambler

The role of Mueller maybe more of leading the investigation away from corruption than it is to find corruption. As a special counsel, the direction of the investigation is determined by where he takes it.

With no evidence against Trump for collusion, what is the point, well maybe it's to prevent rocks from being overturned. Damage control or better still, damage containment .

a reply to: jadedANDcynical

You'll also note that Qatar was conveniently absent during the vote on the Kimberley Process.

Back in the days of Eagle and Evergreen they flowed like water.

originally posted by: pale5218
a reply to: Grambler

The role of Mueller maybe more of leading the investigation away from corruption than it is to find corruption. As a special counsel, the direction of the investigation is determined by where he takes it.

With no evidence against Trump for collusion, what is the point, well maybe it's to prevent rocks from being overturned. Damage control or better still, damage containment .

Yes this is a great point.

If the investigation and all inclsuive as it should be, it will invilev investigating not only Trump, but Obama and Lynch for their actions in the Hillary investigatio and unmasking innocent Americans, Comey for his actions both in his leaks and his handling of the Hillary investigation, as well as the FBI in general of their handling of the HIllary investigation.

Can the former leader of the FBI, who is best chums with Comey, be impartial in investigating his friends at the FBI?

Seems like he is in an ideal position to keep things covered up.

a reply to: Grambler

2009 was also when the first deal happened for Russia to acquire Uranium One.

I believe it was also the same year that RUSNANO was granted permission to build a facility in the US under Clintons approval. The head of RUSNANO USA was also the chairman for Joule.

Seems Hillary has/had a LOT more shady dealings with the Russians than Trump could ever have.

a reply to: Vasa Croe

Podesta benefitted to the tune of 35 million via his Russian dealings, but it seems his t's were crossed and his i's dotted.

originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
a reply to: Grambler

I'm looking in to this too, and what I'm coming across throws in conflict diamonds and other means of transporting wealth outside of cash:

Clinton:

The Clinton Administration has worked to create an international diamond trade regime, likely employing certificates of origin, but seeks to ensure that legitimate diamond producers are not hurt by emerging policies.

Anytime the Clintons are interested in something, we know they're also going to find a way to skim/scam/leverage for themselves and cohorts.

Enter Mueller:

During a September 19, 2002 hearing on terrorist financing and implementation of the USA PATRIOT Act before the House Committee on Financial Services, for instance, Robert Mueller, Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, called for legislation that would allow for the pre-trial freezing of fungible assets linked to alleged criminal offense, including diamonds, gold and other precious metals, “without requiring strict tracing to the offense.”67

Now, this is years before the uranium thing happens. So now the FBI (under Mueller) wants to have untraceable funds they now have a way of acquiring funding, “without requiring strict tracing to the offense.”

Uranium?

The Al Qaeda network has also been linked to trade in other precious gems, and possibly other natural resources, mined in Africa.28

...

28 A shipment of uranium that may have been mined in the DRC was intercepted in November 2002 in Tanzania; see Mike Mande and Joseph Mwamunyange, “Tanzania, US to Investigate Source of Illegal Uranium,” The East African, November 18, 2002.

leakyplace /wiki/CRS:_Diamonds_and_Conflict:_Bakcground,_Policy,_and_Legislation,_July_16,_2003

There is a LOT more if you dig into Africa and the Clinton Foundation in regards to uranium rich areas and leaders that were oddly praised by the Obama administration who had terrible human rights violations constantly.

I posted about it in another thread a while back but don't have the time to do it again right now.

a reply to: Grambler

They sure do a lot of sneaky business on the Tarmac!

Its sounding like the Clinton's shady deal making location of choice is out on tarmacs.

This probably just shows that Hillary skirted the law in the way she does things. It probably was not the proper way to do things. But when have we known the Clinton's to do things right, maybe never. Other than that, this little transfer was not that bad. But this is just one of probably hundreds of things she did wrong. She ignored regulations constantly.

I've seen quite a few on the left play this story down as nothing... the same ones that were salivating and crying for Sessions to resign after he was simply at the same conference as a Russian.

Go figure.

So , being at a conference and shaking a Russians hand - collusion and treason
Arranging for the delivery of HEU at meeting with Russians on some runway - all normal.

Quite surprised our resident Russian conspiracy theory lunatic is not interested in this thread...

a reply to: Grambler

So Mueller is made Special Counsel and a cable linking him to Hillary Clinton just "happens" to get leaked, then promptly featured by zerohedge. Well, it couldn't possibly have anything to do with Russia, right Comrades?

a reply to: Grambler
Thank you for digging this up!

Hillary having Mueller clandestinely deliver uranium samples to the Russians on the tarmac. What is it with Hillary and uranium and Russians, and tarmac meetings?

I'm interested to see your response in this thread. I'm sick to death of the partisan BS. This should flush it out. No one can read this and think everything we are seeing is legit.

originally posted by: UKTruth
Quite surprised our resident Russian conspiracy theory lunatic is not interested in this thread...

And I am not surprised that our resident Russian conspiracy denialist lunatic is already here. Leaks are illegal and leakers need to be punished... unless they make Clinton look bad.

Just so we all know, here is what the "secret meeting" was about:

--Further, with the delivery of this sample, we hope to
collaborate more closely on promoting a more effective
relationship between our law enforcement organizations to
counter illicit trafficking of nuclear materials.

--In particular, such efforts were underscored in the July
Summit joint presidential statement on nuclear cooperation
regarding our commitments to strengthen cooperation to stop
acts of nuclear terrorism. Securing vulnerable nuclear
materials and improving nuclear security within our two
countries is our highest priority.

-- It is our hope to eventually establish a more systematic
mechanism to facilitate U.S.-Russian cooperation on
investigations into nuclear smuggling cases. We continue to
believe that Russia should be concerned by the prospect that
HEU was diverted from one of its facilities, and should
actively investigate the incident.

Cable 09STATE85588_a

It was part of an authorized program investigating potential nuclear trafficking. Nice try at disinformation, though.