It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Nunes states no collusion between Trump and Putin

page: 1
18
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 01:27 PM
link   
There is no evidence of collusion between Trump and Putin. They never met. They never communicated, not by text or phone or paper or video. They don't like each other. Never did. Never will. In the 2016 election, Putin backed Bernie Sanders on the Democrat side and Rand Paul on the Republican side. They are they only 2 senators out of 100 that voted against sanctions on Russia and Iran. Trump on the other hand is hostile to Russia and Iran.

www.politico.com...




posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 01:29 PM
link   

politifact - meh. A cursory look shows they are not being honest - as usual. These were the bozo's who rated a Bernie claim as true and when Trump made the same claim, they rated it as false. Gotta love liberal fact checkers


Thought politico was one of them very fake news liberal rag pieces.

Guess that goes out of the window when the article fits a certain narrative though, eh?



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye


Well ya thats obvious isnt it? Putin didn't beat Hillary, Trump did.


+3 more 
posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 01:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: RomeByFire

politifact - meh. A cursory look shows they are not being honest - as usual. These were the bozo's who rated a Bernie claim as true and when Trump made the same claim, they rated it as false. Gotta love liberal fact checkers


Thought politico was one of them very fake news liberal rag pieces.

Guess that goes out of the window when the article fits a certain narrative though, eh?


This isn't an unnamed source who is quoted as saying something and then a spun headline.
This is actual quotes from the chair of the House Committee - a man who has access to classified materials.

Try again.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 01:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: RomeByFire

politifact - meh. A cursory look shows they are not being honest - as usual. These were the bozo's who rated a Bernie claim as true and when Trump made the same claim, they rated it as false. Gotta love liberal fact checkers


Thought politico was one of them very fake news liberal rag pieces.

Guess that goes out of the window when the article fits a certain narrative though, eh?

It would seem to indicate that the tide has turned if a 'liberal rag' posts something of this nature.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 01:41 PM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

The house intelligence agency never investigated Trump just members of the administration and wasn't Nunez thrown off the investigation after he went and told Trump that contact between foreign targets(Russia) and Trump had been intercepted?
edit on 18-6-2017 by conscientiousobserver because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 01:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: conscientiousobserver
a reply to: allsee4eye

The house intelligence agency never investigated Trump. So how would Nunez know?


They were investigation collusion with Russia and have been for a long time.
This is just the latest person to confirm there is zero evidence of any collusion.

You're going to have to come to terms with it sooner or later - I suggest you start sooner.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 01:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: RomeByFire

politifact - meh. A cursory look shows they are not being honest - as usual. These were the bozo's who rated a Bernie claim as true and when Trump made the same claim, they rated it as false. Gotta love liberal fact checkers


Thought politico was one of them very fake news liberal rag pieces.

Guess that goes out of the window when the article fits a certain narrative though, eh?


This isn't an unnamed source who is quoted as saying something and then a spun headline.
This is actual quotes from the chair of the House Committee - a man who has access to classified materials.

Try again.


So politico isn't fake news?

I'm just trying to get it straight.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 01:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: conscientiousobserver
a reply to: allsee4eye

The house intelligence agency never investigated Trump just members of the administration and wasn't Nunez thrown off the investigation after he went and told Trump that contact between foreign targets(Russia) and Trump had been intercepted?


They were investigating his campaign staff.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 01:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: RomeByFire

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: RomeByFire

politifact - meh. A cursory look shows they are not being honest - as usual. These were the bozo's who rated a Bernie claim as true and when Trump made the same claim, they rated it as false. Gotta love liberal fact checkers


Thought politico was one of them very fake news liberal rag pieces.

Guess that goes out of the window when the article fits a certain narrative though, eh?


This isn't an unnamed source who is quoted as saying something and then a spun headline.
This is actual quotes from the chair of the House Committee - a man who has access to classified materials.

Try again.


So politico isn't fake news?

I'm just trying to get it straight.


Did Trump call out Politico in his tweet as enemy of the people in his tweet? And since the answer is no its not Fake News.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 01:55 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

www.npr.org...

The whole reason Nunez had to recuse himself months ago was because he had found out that there was evidence that Trump and co had communications with overseas targets (Russia) and went straight to Trump and told him. Instead of sharing this information with the house intelligence committee first.

He hasn't been apart of the investigation for months. He would have no idea whether there was new found evidence or not.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 01:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: conscientiousobserver
a reply to: UKTruth

www.npr.org...

The whole reason Nunez had to recuse himself months ago was because he had found out that there was evidence that Trump and co had communications with overseas targets (Russia) and went straight to Trump and told him. Instead of sharing this information with the house intelligence committee first.

He hasn't been apart of the investigation for months. He would have no idea whether there was new found evidence or not.


Wrong.
He went to Trump to advise that there were reports of intercepted calls between people discussing Trump and his family - and Trump and his families names were unmasked.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 01:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: RomeByFire

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: RomeByFire

politifact - meh. A cursory look shows they are not being honest - as usual. These were the bozo's who rated a Bernie claim as true and when Trump made the same claim, they rated it as false. Gotta love liberal fact checkers


Thought politico was one of them very fake news liberal rag pieces.

Guess that goes out of the window when the article fits a certain narrative though, eh?


This isn't an unnamed source who is quoted as saying something and then a spun headline.
This is actual quotes from the chair of the House Committee - a man who has access to classified materials.

Try again.


So politico isn't fake news?

I'm just trying to get it straight.


Look for video and actual named quotes.
It's not difficult.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 02:04 PM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye



There is no evidence of collusion between Trump and Putin. They never met. They never communicated, not by text or phone or paper or video.

Flat out lie. Trump himself has admitted several times that he knew Putin. You know how Donnie loves to name drop.
Trump Admits To ‘Relationship’ With Putin In Resurfaced Video


Trump on the other hand is hostile to Russia

Sure he is that's why when he meets with their people he bans our news media while giving classified information on our allies to them.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 02:12 PM
link   
The entire Russian narrative is nothing more than a distractionary tactic. So as long as we keep wasting time discussing it is achieving its aim.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 02:13 PM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye


When did Nunes become credible?



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 02:14 PM
link   
a reply to: buster2010

Trump spoke to Putin via telephone many years ago when he traveled to Moscow on a possible Real Estate venture.

They've never met.

And some people are going to go to jail for unmasking.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 02:16 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

did he ever share the information in those reports with the investigative committee he was heading at the time?
and by the way, he got those reports supposedly from the white house....lol....
he destroyed any faith I had that the house committee was actually capable of an honest investigation.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 02:18 PM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

Lol and this is coming from politico!

I consider politico to be useless propaganda and I understand why you would use this as a source, the left believe it to be a bastion of proof and therefore will have to stop and digest this info.

They really did not have a choice but to report Nunes by his words. Kind of difficult to spin and keep on with the rah rah Russia and Putin nonsense.

Gonna be interesting observing the levels of cognitive dissonance that will be employed to ignore this info, the lies of the deep state continue to be exposed!


edit on America/ChicagoSundayAmerica/Chicago06America/Chicago630pmSunday3 by elementalgrove because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 02:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: UKTruth

did he ever share the information in those reports with the investigative committee he was heading at the time?
and by the way, he got those reports supposedly from the white house....lol....
he destroyed any faith I had that the house committee was actually capable of an honest investigation.



Yes he shared them.
He viewed the documents at the scif on the Whitehouse grounds.

He's just another to confirm there is no evidence of collusion.

You might want to think about how you are going to handle the realisation you have been duped by partisan politics and fake news stories and narratives.



new topics

top topics



 
18
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join