Robert Mueller WILL Recommend President Trumps Impeachment. WHAT Should The President Do ASAP?

a reply to: UKTruth

It shouldn't be all that hard to grasp the irony.
Trump sent them into harms way as the CIC, the buck stops with him, as with the Secretary of state. No wrong doing, bad things happen with much responsibility.

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: UKTruth

It shouldn't be all that hard to grasp the irony.
Trump sent them into harms way as the CIC, the buck stops with him, as with the Secretary of state. No wrong doing, bad things happen with much responsibility.

That is not leaving them to die.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: UKTruth

It shouldn't be all that hard to grasp the irony.
Trump sent them into harms way as the CIC, the buck stops with him, as with the Secretary of state. No wrong doing, bad things happen with much responsibility.

That is not leaving them to die.

Neither is not knowing what the chaotic situation on the ground is.

a reply to: UKTruth

If that were true, then why hasn't trump lived up to his promise to prosecute her.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: UKTruth

It shouldn't be all that hard to grasp the irony.
Trump sent them into harms way as the CIC, the buck stops with him, as with the Secretary of state. No wrong doing, bad things happen with much responsibility.

That is not leaving them to die.

Neither is not knowing what the chaotic situation on the ground is.

Depends on the amount of time one knows about it.

a reply to: DJW001

Nice
He is the CIC so yeah I will buy he is responsible.

Will he be sending his minions out with a youtube video to blame the deaths on ?

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: UKTruth

That is not what I asked. How did Trump leave the 7 sailors to die?

How did Clinton leave the diplomats in Libya to die? Isn't that the point? Months of investigation to discover that the Secretary of State is not omniscient. No wrongdoing. Trump on the other hand....

guess you missed out on the requests filed for more men,better security ect....
blaming it on a video then putting the person who made the video in jail ....yeah that is wrongdoing

what are you going to do when it is revealed it was all for arming isis to fight in syria? any wrongdoing then?

a reply to: UKTruth

So any new evidence that ANYTHING illegal was done?
Are we still at no collusion, no crime?
Or have I missed something?

a reply to: shooterbrody

So has President Trump exposed the CIA's founding of ISIS yet? It is within his power.

a reply to: DJW001

He doesn't have to, wikileaks already has....

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: DJW001

He doesn't have to, wikileaks already has....

That's not true, of course, but if it were, what would he have to lose?

a reply to: DJW001

source for your "thats not true"?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: UKTruth

So any new evidence that ANYTHING illegal was done?
Are we still at no collusion, no crime?
Or have I missed something?

No evidence of any wrong doing.
In the wider team I think the best the left has at the moment is some forms were not filled out correctly by a a couple of members to a new administration, though we don;t know how common that is.

a reply to: UKTruth

Have you looked at what flynn will get for filling out those forms improperly? They will dock his pension for the amount he received. Thats it.
Flynn maintains he asked for permission and has forms/emails to prove that. It is interesting that he offered to testify and got no response.

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: UKTruth

Have you looked at what flynn will get for filling out those forms improperly? They will dock his pension for the amount he received. Thats it.
Flynn maintains he asked for permission and has forms/emails to prove that. It is interesting that he offered to testify and got no response.

Carter Paige is practically begging to testify also... they don;t want him to I guess... need to keep the lies going.

a reply to: UKTruth

I think Paige and Manafort both know where lots of bodies are buried in europe and neither will be prosecuted or allowed to publicly testify.

From the article:

Mueller has also broadened his scope to include the scrutinizing of financial activities of Trump associates, reportedly based on hunches about possible bribery and money-laundering. These, in turn, are based on the assumption that there was collusion — notwithstanding that months of investigation by the FBI and several congressional committees has turned up no such evidence.

Good luck with any of this BS.

"Trump associates" = not Trump.
"hunches"
"assumptions"
"no such evidence"

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

I know what you mean. People should watch the whole speech. It's clearly a heart wrenching issue for Cuban Americans. It also shows the character of our President.

a reply to: darkbake

Well if he does get impeached I hope he starts spilling the beans on e.t.

a reply to: RogueWaterC1

I love it when Rubio starts speaking Spanish. I felt a lot of pride for the people in that room and I'm not even American.