It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: FraggleRock
originally posted by: UKTruth
Oh, right.
So he said don't pull out your firearm... And then the idiot in the car started reaching for something.
Pretty obvious why he is dead and no wonder the officer was acquitted.
Now there are more spoiled brats out in force to protest against justice.
Yeah, he was reaching for the ID he was instructed to provide and the cowardly idiot shot him to death.
Obvious indeed.
Now there are more cowardly idiots who just got the green light to shoot anyone that scares them.
originally posted by: UKTruth
The testimony against the officer says that the ID had already been handed over.
Read it.
The decision was wholly correct.
Maybe it will encourage others to follow instructions to the letter when they are given them.
originally posted by: FraggleRock
originally posted by: UKTruth
The testimony against the officer says that the ID had already been handed over.
Read it.
The decision was wholly correct.
Maybe it will encourage others to follow instructions to the letter when they are given them.
How about you actually produce a source so there are no misunderstandings to what you are referring. Because the official complaint that I've seen and provided multiple times states that Castile's ID was still in his wallet upon arrival to the hospital. So if you have another source that refutes this information I'm open to looking at it and we could put our misunderstanding to bed right now.
In the HCMC emergency department, medical personnel recovered a holster and wallet from one of Castile's pockets, although it was unclear which pocket these items were in at the time of the shooting. In Castile's wallet was his Minnesota Driver's License and his Permit to Carry a Pistol.
originally posted by: FraggleRock
a reply to: UKTruth
So you're using the same source I've provided several times to claim ID was already provided.
I'll simply refer you to my first post on the matter then.
POST
So did you stop reading at the point you've provided or are you intentionally ignoring this part?
In the HCMC emergency department, medical personnel recovered a holster and wallet from one of Castile's pockets, although it was unclear which pocket these items were in at the time of the shooting. In Castile's wallet was his Minnesota Driver's License and his Permit to Carry a Pistol.
originally posted by: FraggleRock
a reply to: face23785
So it's relevant when others use it but irrelevant when I do?
How about before forming our opinions we just make sure the information provided in this thread is accurate.
originally posted by: FraggleRock
a reply to: UKTruth
Correct. Castile had already provided proof of insurance, which was in possession of officer Yanez. Though despite what you've claimed numerous times, Castile had not provided his ID as instructed to do. He was following the instruction to provided his ID while repeatedly telling Yanez he was not reaching for his firearm. It was not made clear to Castile that officer Yanez no longer wanted him to provided his ID.
originally posted by: jaynkeel
All of this is so pointless anymore. Why have I never seen the question asked, If the cop felt threatened weather in this case or others, why not retreat? Is that not an option? Can the officer not step back from the vehicle while explaining to the driver/ other a miscommunication is taking place and pause? Because it seems glaringly obvious to me this would deescalate a lot of these encounters. I guarantee whatever offense the original pull over was initiated with does not equal death on either side. In most cases. Hell even if the person got spooked and drove off catch them another time, it just seems there is an unwritten law that says # has to be handeled asap even a minor traffic offense. I just dont get it. Perhaps the cops need to be toned down a few notches in tense situations and it made policy. Perhaps a bullet proof cruiser with a bank style drive up teller slot where the officer doesnt leave the car until info is ran would solve this, i really dont know but the way we are doing it and have done it aint working anymore apparently.