It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: secretagent77
originally posted by: Starbuck799
originally posted by: face23785
originally posted by: Starbuck799
originally posted by: Starbuck799
a reply to: Deny Arrogance
Why has the officer been fired if he followed correct procedure? If he did nothing wrong, why is he out of a job now?
originally posted by: face23785
Probably the same reason he was even charged: politics and appeasing the mob.
That's #ed up man!
Yes it is. The Founders tried to design our country so that it wouldn't give in to mob rule. The media has undone a lot of that. They try you on the nightly news with cherry picked bits and pieces and most people never learn the real truth. There's still idiots who think Michael Brown had his hands up and was executed.
Your country is so #ed up. Although I will say that my country, (Canada), isn't much better. So sad.
Yes but at least in Canada and Britain the police do not have to carry guns because no one there has any to start with. We need to take all the guns from the americans so we can be safe here in our own country. We've been thinking of moving to canda to get away from all this gun violence here.
originally posted by: secretagent77
a reply to: face23785
easy to take all the guns away. Pass a law that unless you belong to the miliiary militia you can't have guns, just like the founding fathers intended it. Then after you pass the law, get the military to enforce it, and search the houses and take the guns, simple as that. It's worked in places like australia, britain and canada, it can work here. The 2nd says only militia should have guns, it's very clear.
And I have studied the consitiution, it says only miilitia need the guns.
simple EO from Trump will do it when he feels it's the right time.
originally posted by: secretagent77
a reply to: face23785
easy to take all the guns away. Pass a law that unless you belong to the miliiary militia you can't have guns, just like the founding fathers intended it. Then after you pass the law, get the military to enforce it, and search the houses and take the guns, simple as that. It's worked in places like australia, britain and canada, it can work here. The 2nd says only militia should have guns, it's very clear.
originally posted by: secretagent77
a reply to: face23785
Not really, simple EO from Trump will do it when he feels it's the right time. Guns kill more americans than terrorists. And I have studied the consitiution, it says only miilitia need the guns.
originally posted by: secretagent77
a reply to: face23785
The supreme court isn't everything, even a lower court was able to overturn a travel ban. Alls it takes is one federal judge and an EO from Trump, if you don't belive me it's coming, fine, but don't say i didn't tell u so.
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
The first part of the amendment is more than enough to rule on and make an executive order. It's coming, america can't afford anymore gun violence, the guns have to be taken away. Canada, Britain and Australia did it, why can't the USA? Keep the hunting guns at a central place where people can check them in and out if they are going hunting, other than that no need for guns.
originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: secretagent77
Weird...you didn't finish the amendment.
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Are you trolling?
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held in a 5–4 decision that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense