It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: MotherMayEye
I'm not sure what minimum sentencing requirements are in the state of MA, or how it applies to this young lady (I thought I read she was being charged as a minor?), but I read the sentencing isn't until August 3rd. Is it a given she will go to prison?
As others have said, the individual who took his life is 100% responsible for his actions, but he was mentally ill and she kept encouraging him to go through with it multiple times. Maybe it's a wake up call she needs...
originally posted by: kibric
www.azleg.gov...
Mere words or gestures, although extremely offensive and insulting, have traditionally been viewed as insufficient provocation to reduce murder to manslaughter. There is, however, a modern trend in some courts to hold that words alone will suffice under certain circumstances, such as instances in which a present intent and ability to cause harm is demonstrated.
legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com...
Les is not a Lawyer
all cases are different
Manslaughter by Coercion is a thing
Manslaughter by Coercion is a thing
But, again, him committing suicide was not an issue she raised. He did. and he sought her ought to support him in that decision as far as I understand.
link
Commonwealth v. Godin, 374 Mass. 120, 126, 371 N.E.2d 438 1977). Involuntary manslaughter is “an unlawful homicide, unintentionally caused by an act which constitutes such a disregard of probable harmful consequences to another as to constitute wanton or reckless conduct.”
...the defendant owed a duty of care and that “wanton or reckless conduct may consist of intentional failure to take such care in disregard of the probable consequences and their right to care.” Id. at 397, 55 N.E.2d 902.
Involuntary manslaughter
1) An unlawful killing that was unintentionally caused as the result of the defendants' wanton or reckless conduct;
False. Manslaughter by coercion is not a thing.
11.03A4
Manslaughter by Coercion
The crime of manslaughter by coercion requires proof that:
1. Under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to human life, the defendant recklessly engaged in conduct which created a grave risk of death and thereby caused the death of another person; and
2. The defendant was coerced to engage in the conduct by the use or threatened immediate use of unlawful deadly physical force upon the defendant or another person which a reasonable person in the defendant’s situation would have been unable to resist.
originally posted by: silo13
a reply to: MotherMayEye
But, again, him committing suicide was not an issue she raised. He did. and he sought her ought to support him in that decision as far as I understand.
So what’s your evaluation of the description of the law in this case?
link
Commonwealth v. Godin, 374 Mass. 120, 126, 371 N.E.2d 438 1977). Involuntary manslaughter is “an unlawful homicide, unintentionally caused by an act which constitutes such a disregard of probable harmful consequences to another as to constitute wanton or reckless conduct.”
...the defendant owed a duty of care and that “wanton or reckless conduct may consist of intentional failure to take such care in disregard of the probable consequences and their right to care.” Id. at 397, 55 N.E.2d 902.
He exited the truck seeking life/air. He was AFRAID.
Regardless, she provoked him to get back into the truck - where she could hear his coughing, choking and the generator.
She failed to call the police, for emergency medical help, his parents.
Curious what you think.
peace
originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
a reply to: kibric
I stand corrected. In Arizona, there is a such thing as Manslaughter by coercion.
Involuntary manslaughter
1) An unlawful killing that was unintentionally caused as the result of the defendants' wanton or reckless conduct;