It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Guilty Verdict in Teen 'Suicide-by-Text' Case

page: 13
12
<< 10  11  12    14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 12:47 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus




I'm a Mason, I'm always lying.

And so was the statute I gave you.


So these lawyers are lying, or are otherwise misinformed, while you know the deal. I suspect rather than respect your thinking here. At least you didn't say it was irrelevant this time.




posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 12:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
So these lawyers are lying...


Nope, I just admitted I was lying and that the statute that you asked for was lying. It was only like, one line, so it really did its job effectively.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 12:53 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus




Nope, I just admitted I was lying and that the statute that you asked for was lying. It was only like, one line, so it really did its job effectively.


But you're lying again. The law is not lying. It is actually true that "nothing in this chapter shall be construed to constitute, condone, authorize, or approve suicide or mercy killing or to permit any affirmative or deliberate act to end one's own life other than to permit the natural process of dying."

As the law itself says, the chapter does not condone or authorize or approve or permit any affirmative or deliberate act to commit suicide. How that has anything to do with what we are talking about is unclear, but according to you, it's cut and dry.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 12:55 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Clearly you only managed to graduate Magna Cum Poo. You're outclassed, Mason.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 12:56 PM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

Why do you care what I think? I'm a liar.

The full statue, also a liar, is rather lengthy and deals with all aspects of patient rights, including suicide, which is illegal in Massachusetts, assisted or otherwise.

But don't believe me, I'm a liar. Honestly.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6




Clearly you only managed to graduate Magna Cum Poo. You're outclassed, Mason.


You cannot even argue your own case, preferring to hide behind someone else doing the heavy lifting for you.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 12:58 PM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope




posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 12:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Shamrock6
You're outclassed, Mason.


Redundant!



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 12:59 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Touche. But I just really wanted to make my point. Twice.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 12:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
You cannot even argue your own case, preferring to hide behind someone else doing the heavy lifting for you.


Now, now. Be nice.

This isn't heavy at all. Having a conversation with Zazz or Kali? That's tough.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 01:00 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus



Why do you care what I think? I'm a liar.

The full statue, also a liar, is rather lengthy and deals with all aspects of patient rights, including suicide, which is illegal in Massachusetts, assisted or otherwise.

But don't believe me, I'm a liar. Honestly.


I don't believe you. I also don't believe that you're a liar. Besides I'm just a confused foreigner, mistakenly taking the words of lawyers over some guy on the internet.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 01:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Why are you projecting?



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 01:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Besides I'm just a confused foreigner, mistakenly taking the words of lawyers over some guy on the internet.


Well, at least you can admit that you are confused and mistaken.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 01:02 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Really I'm just confused about what "case" I'm supposed to be arguing to begin with. Given that somebody keeps trying to insert themselves into a conversation that doesn't include them, all while repeating the mantra that they're being clung to, it's wholly confusing.

Was I supposed to making a case when I was talking to you? Maybe you know what case I'm supposed to making here. Where'd von go, maybe they know.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 01:02 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus



Well, at least you can admit that you are confused and mistaken.


It's called sarcasm. Perhaps I should have used scare quotes.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 01:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
It's called sarcasm. Perhaps I should have used scare quotes.


No, bad idea, that's how you got yourself into this mess in the first place.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 01:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6




Really I'm just confused about what "case" I'm supposed to be arguing to begin with. Given that somebody keeps trying to insert themselves into a conversation that doesn't include them, all while repeating the mantra that they're being clung to, it's wholly confusing.

Was I supposed to making a case when I was talking to you? Maybe you know what case I'm supposed to making here. Where'd von go, maybe they know.


We can talk to each other or you can talk about me to others. It's your choice, but either way you cannot keep me out of your mouth.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 01:04 PM
link   
a reply to: Shamrock6

Let me see if I can recap.

Person gets found guilty. The end.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 01:04 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus




No, bad idea, that's how you got yourself into this mess in the first place.


Or your poor grasp of punctuation, one or the other.



posted on Jun, 20 2017 @ 01:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
Or your poor grasp of punctuation, one or the other.


I know how to use punctuation marks, especially when I have to do emoticons.




top topics



 
12
<< 10  11  12    14 >>

log in

join