It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

This List Of Attacks Against Conservatives Is Mind Blowing

page: 18
44
<< 15  16  17   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 12:19 PM
link   
a reply to: fredrodgers1960

Ok maybe capitalist economy is the wrong term to use. You can still have a profit based economy with socialism and unless every country is socialist . it is actually required.

The base definition of socialism is a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.

There are multiple forms of social ownership including public, employee, and state owned. The one most practiced would be state ownership. The best example would be China. Where their economy is flourishing thanks to state owned and regulated businesses. There are some problems with over capacity and under payment but since everything is owned by the government. They can easily shift to emerging markets since everything isn't reliant on profits. Chinas massive switch from coal to solar being a prime example.

I for one am for state sponsored employee owned businesses, with a dash of democracy i.e. right to vote, but guess who stands to lose the most from that ideology?( I will give you a hint. It's a very small percentage of the American population.)
edit on 18-6-2017 by conscientiousobserver because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 12:32 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

9/11 wasn't done by radical Islam, though.

It was done by Saudi Arabia, and allowed to happen by the U.S. government.

Also:


If all white racists are to be considered right wing terrorists, then to be fair we should consider all anti white racists as left wing. In this case, all black on white violence such as the knock out game would be left wing terrorism.


Arguably one of the most ignorant things I've read on ATS.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 05:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: seasonal

Yes, much like conservatives did when Obama was elected, now it's the liberal's turn to loose their minds and act like children. I must admit that the left has gone way past the point that conservatives did though.

I mean, all the Conservatives did was obstruct when Obama was in office - they spent 8 years doing nothing but yelling no with their fingers in their ears.

Liberals have turned into a bunch of fascists. It's really disheartening.

(as a side note though, conservatives going NEENER NEENER NEENER at the left, are only making things worse for themselves. Conservatives use to complain that liberals talked down to them and had some kind of intellectual superiority complex. Well conservatives are now doing the same to the left.)

~Tenth


"I mean, all the Conservatives did was obstruct when Obama was in office"

You cannot be serious.....



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 07:10 PM
link   
a reply to: RomeByFire

These studies say white people targeting minorities are considered right wing terror, so what is ignorant about saying this means minority groups that target whites for violence are committing left wing terror.

Either both of these things is true, or neither (which is what I think)

But for a study to claim that white racism is right wing terror but not label minority racism as the same on the left proves hypocrisy.



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 07:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler
Either both of these things is true, or neither (which is what I think)

Not necessarily.

You are extrapolating from the scant words offered in that article and completely overlooking the criteria:

(1) affiliated with far-right associations, and

(2) intended to promote ideas compatible with far-right ideology

if there is no connection with a group or promotion of right-wing ideology it is not considered right-wing. You jumped to the wrong conclusion.



posted on Jun, 19 2017 @ 12:13 PM
link   
I posted on the wrong thread.... disregard....



edit on 19-6-2017 by TheErlenmeyerFlask because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 19 2017 @ 12:22 PM
link   
If Trump were Black there wouldn't be such hate towards him.

If Democrats weren't so frustrated by their own stupidity in choosing Hillary, there would be less violence.



posted on Jun, 19 2017 @ 12:38 PM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

The dems did not choose Hillary the faint. They chose Sanders.

Hillary would have done anything to get the nomination, and as we will find out in the future that Hillary did tons of illegal stuff to try to win the presidency.



posted on Jun, 19 2017 @ 03:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik

originally posted by: Grambler
Either both of these things is true, or neither (which is what I think)

Not necessarily.

You are extrapolating from the scant words offered in that article and completely overlooking the criteria:

(1) affiliated with far-right associations, and

(2) intended to promote ideas compatible with far-right ideology

if there is no connection with a group or promotion of right-wing ideology it is not considered right-wing. You jumped to the wrong conclusion.


But these studies define white supremacy as right wing ideology.

Notice how they used info from groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center? This group cites all right supremacists as white wing hate groups.

So a racist attack on a black person is considered right wing terror. If thats the case, then minority attacks on whites based on race must be called left wing terror.



posted on Jun, 19 2017 @ 04:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Grambler
But these studies define white supremacy as right wing ideology.

Maybe that's because white supremacy groups go around saying that they are.


Notice how they used info from groups like the Southern Poverty Law Center? This group cites all right supremacists as white wing hate groups.

I see even you did a switcharoo there. Aren't they, though?


So a racist attack on a black person is considered right wing terror. If thats the case, then minority attacks on whites based on race must be called left wing terror.

No. Whites are not the only right-wingers. Nation of Islam is considered a conservative group. An attack by them on a white person would be right wing terror (not to me personally because I think calling it terror is hyperbole).

Islamic terrorists are right wing terrorists.

I understand that americans (mostly right-wing americans) have special definitions/ideas about what left and right actually mean. That might be the problem here.



new topics

top topics



 
44
<< 15  16  17   >>

log in

join