Trumps Twitter Machine

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: The GUT

Oh? Do you have access to all the classified and non classified information and testimony that the rest of us don't in order to make that determination?

As far as "obstruction" goes, we have Comey's own words and the letter of the law. So, no, I don't have special information, but I can read.

As far as collusion, even many leftists are starting to admit on the boards that it's dead and they never believed it anyway. Ergo, no collusion, no obstruction from Trump.

Comey, on the other hand, has given evidence that suggests he's an obstructioist.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: The GUT


Trump is being indicted on these objection questions by his own words. Rosenstein gave him a way to fire Comey, but it was Trump that made it about Russia, and brought on the obstruction accusation himself.

Exactly! It's Trump's own mouth that keeps getting him in trouble. On Russia, on obstruction, on his travel ban, all of it. He confirms every anonymous source while screeching about fake media. It would be hilarious if it weren't so embarrassing.

a reply to: iWontGiveUP

He means Rosenstein.

"Keep your friends close and your enemies triggered"

Simple really: If there is no collusion there is no obstruction of "justice."

a reply to: The GUT

Nixon was about to be impeached on "Uh-huh", that's all it took to be considered obstruction. Comey's own words absolve Trump of obstruction? The investigation into collusion is far too early for anyone to say one way or the other. I think it's quite possible that Trump himself was not involved in any collusion by virtue of his idiocy but his team... I can see them colluding, easily.

a reply to: The GUT


The collusion investigation isn't dead. It's just getting started!
Jared Kushner's finances and business dealings are now a focus of the Trump-Russia investigation

originally posted by: The GUT
Simple really: If there is no collusion there is no obstruction of "justice."

Not true. How can anyone even think that would be remotely true? If you interfere with an investigation whether that investigation turns up actionable charges or proves innocence it doesn't matter, you will have obstructed justice.

It's going to be, despite having to live with Pence as president, the funniest thing ever if there's truly no collusion but Trump couldn't control himself long enough to let it play out and gets impeached for obstruction.

Collusion 2016 Election evidence
It wasn't Russia

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: The GUT


The collusion investigation isn't dead. It's just getting started!
Jared Kushner's finances and business dealings are now a focus of the Trump-Russia investigation

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein issued a statement Thursday night warning Americans not to "accept as true" stories based on "anonymous officials." "Americans should exercise caution before accepting as true any stories attributed to anonymous 'officials,' particularly when they do not identify the country -- let alone the branch or agency of government -- with which the alleged sources supposedly are affiliated. Americans should be skeptical about anonymous allegations. The Department of Justice has a long-established policy to neither confirm nor deny such allegations," Rosenstein's full statement read.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: UKTruth

Your cognitive dissonance could dim Las Vegas. Is it fake news that Trump is now under investigation for Obstruction? Nope.

We do not know if the SC are investigating Trump for obstruction.

As for cognitive dissonance, it wasn't me who called Rosenstein's statement bizarre. You still haven't mentioned why it's bizarre.

a reply to: UKTruth

And then Trump confirms those anonymous sources in a fit.

a reply to: UKTruth

First tweet by Trump in the graphic in the OP.

a reply to: UKTruth


LOL. Of course he did. I wonder how many other officials Trump has pressured to publically denounce leaks that he and his associates are being investigated.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: UKTruth

And then Trump confirms those anonymous sources in a fit.

Did he? Or is he just reacting to WaPo?
Do you think Mueller is updating Trump on what he is investigating?

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: UKTruth


LOL. Of course he did. I wonder how many other officials Trump has pressured to publically denounce leaks that he and his associates are being investigated.

So you think Trump is now forcing Rosenstein to issue statements?
Sounds like you are going to hang onto the stories that suit your narrative no matter how flimsy.

a reply to: UKTruth

So what's Trump freaking out about Rosenstein for then?

a reply to: UKTruth


Does Trump get his news from WAPO?

originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: UKTruth

So what's Trump freaking out about Rosenstein for then?

He is known for reacting to newspapers, no?
I find it unlikely that the SC is updating the President.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: UKTruth

And then Trump confirms those anonymous sources in a fit.

Did he? Or is he just reacting to WaPo?
Do you think Mueller is updating Trump on what he is investigating?

Wait... really?!

Trump who calls everything fake news, is going to believe that he's under investigation for obstruction because the Washington Post said so?