It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Looks like a big fake story is about to drop. Rosenstein Issues Odd Statement.

page: 2
19
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

The difference is context.




posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:14 PM
link   
a reply to: Dfairlite

If you go by a Probable Assumption that ALL News and Media Outlets Report Only Lies , then how is Anyone Ever going to Know Factual Events in the World Unless they Happen to be Only in their Personal Experiences ?



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Chadwickus

The difference is context.


Just curious to see what leaks he's talking about... just trying to pinpoint it.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:15 PM
link   
a reply to: spiritualzombie

And the consumer has the privilege of denying the information based upon the anonymity of the source.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:17 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

The difference is if you support the leak or not.

Whistleblower=good
Leaker=bad



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:20 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

Well, can you point me to where they were calling the Podesta leaks whistleblowing? I may have missed it.

If the leak is valid then agenda be damned.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults
a reply to: Chadwickus

What Trump leaks are you referencing specifically?


The ones YOUR president spoke of..

mobile.twitter.com...



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

What leaks though?

When you say Podesta leaks we know EXACTLY what you are talking about but when you say Trump leaks that is VERY vague. The leaks from Podesta are his actual e-mails and the Trump leaks well... what Trump leaks?



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:22 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

But which leak is Trump talking about the memo?



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:24 PM
link   
The fake stories citing anonymous sources already dropped.

Mueller investogating Trump for obstruction - fake!

Mieller investigatigng Kushner - fake!

Rosenstein just debunked them both.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
The fake stories citing anonymous sources already dropped.

Mueller investogating Trump for obstruction - fake!

Mieller investigatigng Kushner - fake!

Rosenstein just debunked them both.


He can't come right out and say that can he?



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:28 PM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

Ask Trump.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

Why can't you just give a straight answer?
edit on 15-6-2017 by toysforadults because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:30 PM
link   
So Trump tweets something about "tapes" and Comey instantly leaks to the Washington Post employing a close friend as a go between.

That Donald is a master troll, outed a high level leaker with a simple tweet. Then Comey admitted to the crime under oath before Congress. Real crime with a confession and the Leftwing loons running shotgun for their masters get Trump somehow obstructed Justice as their headlines. This stuff is psychotic and funny at the same time.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:30 PM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

Quite clearly, it's Comey's memos.

Not my problem if you can't get that.


(post by capncrunch88 removed for a manners violation)

posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: spiritualzombie

originally posted by: Wookiep
a reply to: Dfairlite
We're all getting tired of these "anonymous sources" day in, day out.


It's a fundamental right of a free press...


The protection of sources, sometimes also referred to as the confidentiality of sources or in the U.S. as the reporter's privilege, is a right accorded to journalists under the laws of many countries, as well as under international law.

en.m.wikipedia.org...




Good, then they can go to jail to protect the sources.

If Donald Trump Targets Journalists, Thank Obama



When Mr. Obama was elected in 2008, press freedom groups had high expectations for the former constitutional law professor, particularly after the press had suffered through eight years of bitter confrontation with the Bush administration. But today, many of those same groups say Mr. Obama’s record of going after both journalists and their sources has set a dangerous precedent that Mr. Trump can easily exploit. “Obama has laid all the groundwork Trump needs for an unprecedented crackdown on the press,” said Trevor Timm, executive director of the nonprofit Freedom of the Press Foundation.




www.nytimes.com...




posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:36 PM
link   
a reply to: JinMI

I don't trust yournewswire, but I'm sure you do, so it should suit you just fine..they mention the Podesta emails and Seth Rich being the whistleblower..

WikiLeaks: Guccifer 2.0 Confirms Seth Rich Was DNC Whistleblower






edit on 15/6/17 by Chadwickus because: Deep State!



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:37 PM
link   
a reply to: capncrunch88

Ooh tough guy!



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:37 PM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

So after a years of "unnamed sources" and leaks that never panned out to be real. You saying the comey leak is the leak that's true. Which is a memo, he wrote about a conversation he had. And comeys even said he didn't obstruct justice in the hearings. Not a recording or an official transcript but a memo from comeys memory. That hasn't been verified or leaked in its entirety. Like the thousands of wikileaks publications.

Gotcha.



new topics

top topics



 
19
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join