It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Study: Physically Weak Men More Likely To Be Socialists

page: 5
21
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 12:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: DanteGaland

originally posted by: introvert
Well, I must be special then.

I'm a socialist, but I'm 6'3" tall, 270lbs, former linebacker, wrestler and state champ discuss thrower. Went to high school in an area where I was a minority and had to defend myself constantly.

I work on my own vehicles and do my own home maintenance.

I must have broken the socialist mold.


No. You ate the MOLD and became a super HERO. No radioactive SPIDER needed. Just Socialist Mold.


OKAY ~ that joke sucked. I admit it...


You are correct. I'm super commie man.

I fly around in my Mao undies protecting people from the dangers of evil capitalism, while I hand out welfare checks to sltty single moms and terrorist refugees.

You're welcome.




posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 12:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: DanteGaland

And progressives OVERWHELMINGLY contain a disproportionate number of intellectuals.


Really?

A large percentage of the left's base is the poor. A large percentage of the poor is due to low skill set, minimum education and/or poor life choices.


MORE scientists and those in HIGHLY technical career fields that require STEM subjects are liberal-minded.

These people make YOUR world possible with programming, material science, chemistry...All so MEAT HEADS can have spandex at the GYM and polymers for their glocks.
edit on 15-6-2017 by DanteGaland because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 12:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: DanteGaland

And progressives OVERWHELMINGLY contain a disproportionate number of intellectuals.



I guess, with my awesome build, my high IQ (lower 80's, almost a B+) I must be the stereotypical progressive!

Gonna Hulk-rip mah shirt now to impress the babes.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 12:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: CulturalResilience
Your post to highlight that failed in its intention and instead made it look as though you were indulging in the very thing you were condemning.
a reply to: introvert



It's no concern of mine whether you are capable of understanding the intention or not.

I'm certainly no bad ass and all socialists do not fit specific physical traits or abilities.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 12:47 PM
link   
a reply to: introvert

Super Commie Man....

Bringing a LIVING wage, medical care, and better world for EVERYONE...equally!



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 12:50 PM
link   
a reply to: DanteGaland

Just because silicon valley is just as insane as Hollywood doesnt mean its something to brag about.

Nor does it make you sound smarter for boot licking them for it.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 12:54 PM
link   
Low sexual market value.
That's a big reason why weak(physically and mentally) men and unattractive women tend to be drawn to socialism and government dependency. There are examples against this. But the vast majority are...
Because without social programs they wouldn't be able to compete for resources on the same level as the rest of us. Not saying it's right or moral. But as far as humanity would like to remove itself from the world of natural selection and survival of the fittest we will still be guided by these basic genetic principles.
Women want a strong wise mate.
Men want an attractive healthy mate.

The government is a way of evening the playing field.
But when you look at things like the declining national IQ and our genetic disease epidemic one has to wonder if this is the best course of action. What will humanity look like in 10 generations if ignore these primal traits that helps keep humanity as genetically strong as possible.

Been around the world and found that only stupid people are breeding.
The cretins cloning and feeding and I don't even own a tv.
~Harvey Danger~



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 12:54 PM
link   
I didn't misunderstand your post. I interpreted the meaning based on the meaning of the words you used in the post. As human beings are generally not psychic, it would be better in a written word forum, to use words that actually convey your meaning, rather than those that mean something other than what you want to say.
a reply to: [post=22355275]introvert


edit on 15-6-2017 by CulturalResilience because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 12:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: DanteGaland

MORE scientists and those in HIGHLY technical career fields that require STEM subjects are liberal-minded.


The liberal minded part is because they need Government grants/subsistence to survive. Big Government liberal ideology is the right choice for them. What about the other 99.9999% that also believe in Big Government subsistence too? There is a good reason for them that it is also their logical choice and that reason is not because they need grant money to make the world better...lol
edit on 15-6-2017 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 01:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: hounddoghowlie
a reply to: SprocketUK




Well, there aren't that many jobs that require muscle any more. I doubt you'd find a weak miner or steel worker back in the '70s.


yes you are correct, there are many jobs that require physical strength ask Mike Rowe (Dirty Jobs). lets see how many we can name, i'll start.

construction workers, firefighters, police officers, some truck driving jobs, warehouse workers, cargo and freight workers,
landscapers.

that's eight there are plenty more if you think about that require physical strength.





Not proper working class stuff though.
Builders are pretty much middle class, self employed types who tend not to be socialists, same with cops and the military. I disagree about driving trucks, hell, power steering, people to unload and load you, ratchet straps...None of it requires physical strength anymore. Working in a warehouse doesn't require much strength, I've worked alongside some proper skinny little nothings who use trolleys for everything. Landscapers again, tend to be self employed.

All the big, employed job types that required muscle and endurance have pretty much gone, the main groups who vote left these days work in shops and offices.

edit on 34pThu, 15 Jun 2017 13:10:34 -050020172017-06-15T13:10:34-05:00kAmerica/Chicago30000000k by SprocketUK because: absolutely fantastic spelling



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 01:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: badw0lf
a reply to: Kandinsky

I'd think the doodoo heads living in the real world, with hands on experience and working for peanuts to provide for their families, would lean right simply because of the fact they do live in the real world, with real world problems.

lefty university students with chips on their shoulders who think the world owes them...


I live in both of those worlds. Half my working life has been spent on building sites (labourer then roofer) and minimum-wage jobs in warehouses and bar-tending. The other half has been spent as a white-collar professional and I've been a 'lefty university student' too. I worked in bars and as security to pay my way through uni and can still move three pallets of tiles up ladders in a short day.

I believe most people live in the real world whatever their political views or occupation. Instead of left/right, it's more realistic to see people as asshole or not asshole. Nice or not nice. Friendly or unfriendly. Sometimes we just don't take to someone and they can be nice as pie so there's that to consider too. Hard workers and lazyass wasters span all political sides, right?



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 01:46 PM
link   
I thought The Daily Wire was satire, like the Daily Show or The Onion?

Mission accomplished, Daily Wire.
edit on 15-6-2017 by DefaultNamesake83 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 03:47 PM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

Don't break your arm jerking yourself off there buddy. It takes a mentally weak man to find comfort in a study like this, need someone to tell you how big and strong and correct you are to feed your ego. Physical strenght isn't # if you have a weak mind.

And for the record i'm 135lbs soaking wet and about as far from socialist as you can get, so that kind of discredits that study... but whatever you gotta tell yourself to make you feel big and strong i guess.

PS strength means nothing if i'm a better shot/quicker draw than you. dont forget that part.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 03:59 PM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

Probably because they banned masculinity and testosterone before they brought out socialism in the 21st century.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 04:02 PM
link   
I am STRONG cave man! I kill more beasts for MY tribe!

Yeah. That MAY have mattered 20,000 years ago. Today? Not so MUCH.

REAL strength comes from BETWEEN the ears. A hypothetical:

"I program stock exchange SOFTWARE. I net MILLIONS a year and use it to by INFLUENCE and POWER."

^^ That is STRENGTH in 2017.
edit on 15-6-2017 by DanteGaland because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 04:04 PM
link   
But honestly this study was done in London so it's probably pretty accurate for Europe. For example: I bet the football hooligan bar bouncer that confronted the knife-wielding terrorists in the latest London attack wasn't a socialist. But maybe he's just a big strong courageous socialist.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 04:04 PM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

This kind of thing makes any honest person reel.

This is fascist in its thought dude.

Don't make politics about the weak and the strong or you end up in a bad place.




posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 04:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kandinsky

originally posted by: badw0lf
a reply to: Kandinsky

I'd think the doodoo heads living in the real world, with hands on experience and working for peanuts to provide for their families, would lean right simply because of the fact they do live in the real world, with real world problems.

lefty university students with chips on their shoulders who think the world owes them...


I live in both of those worlds. Half my working life has been spent on building sites (labourer then roofer) and minimum-wage jobs in warehouses and bar-tending. The other half has been spent as a white-collar professional and I've been a 'lefty university student' too. I worked in bars and as security to pay my way through uni and can still move three pallets of tiles up ladders in a short day.

I believe most people live in the real world whatever their political views or occupation. Instead of left/right, it's more realistic to see people as asshole or not asshole. Nice or not nice. Friendly or unfriendly. Sometimes we just don't take to someone and they can be nice as pie so there's that to consider too. Hard workers and lazyass wasters span all political sides, right?


You're wasting your breath.

Lefties = bad
Righties = good

That's the only important thing you need to know.

Anything or anyone outside of that line of thinking is just typical leftie SJW small-man syndrome crybaby stuff.




posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 04:08 PM
link   
a reply to: DanteGaland

I hope you're not alluding that socialism is a viewpoint held by intelligent people. That is unless they're the ones at the top roping in all the suckers believing socialism is good at the bottom.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 04:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: DanteGaland
And MENTALLY smarter people ... who are physically weaker will BEAT and DEFEAT stronger, dumber alphas every time.

Brains OVER brawn.

And progressives OVERWHELMINGLY contain a disproportionate number of intellectuals.

They just dont BREED as quickly.


You have been mislead.

Intellectualism is not the same as intelligence.




top topics



 
21
<< 2  3  4    6 >>

log in

join