It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Study: Physically Weak Men More Likely To Be Socialists

page: 3
21
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 07:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sublimecraft

originally posted by: ErrorErrorError

originally posted by: Outlier13
Stronger males foster the mentality of being self reliant because it is simply at the core of who we are. It's the primal essence.

Those that can...DO. Those that can't...must rely upon others.

I bet plenty of liberals opened this thread and felt threatened.


I opened this thread and felt like I was sitting in a basement somewhere in the US Bible Belt and it reeked of Old Spice


Interpretation: "Outlier13, your post triggered me so I shall revert to base and talk about my mums basement, where I post from - it's called projection"


Luckily I do have a life and I'm busy dealing with real life problems, however anonymous posts on a conspiracy forum really don't mean much to me.
Why would anyone be triggered over something they read on a conspiracy forum ?

You senior citizens take this online crap waaay to seriously.




posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 07:51 AM
link   

originally posted by: cynicalheathen
I currently weigh 225lbs ( 102k 16 stones )

*looks at his 2x bodyweight deadlifts from Monday*

*looks at his 1.25x bodyweight Benchpress from Tuesday*

*thinks about his 1.75x bodyweight squats he has to do today.*

*Is an an-cap*

Yeah... sounds about right.
...okay, I feel like you just used this thread to show off your "guns".

Cringy.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 08:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: CulturalResilience
I have lost count of how many lonely nice guys I have met, but I don't think I have ever met a lonely charming jerkboy. Once you realise that to understand what women find attractive you have disregard what they say, and instead, observe what they actually do, the irrefutable truth is glaringly obvious. Jocks get women, geeks do not. Of course weak men are more likely to be socialist because they need the protection and safety that comes from state dependency.

Watch as Britney/Tori/Chelsy/etc while away their time waiting for Prince Charming in the bed's of the Black Knights. This dumb jock jerkboy has a notch count that geeks can only dream of, and I wouldn't trade it for the involuntary celibacy that comes with being a weak socialist.



You see, this rather proves my point. Does this website really need people boasting about their alleged sexual conquests to prove they are alpha males unlike those 'weak socialists'? I mean, really, is the average age here now 14?


(Newsflash by the way, Jocks get girls in highschool. Geeks get women in their 20s and onwards, once those women have matured a little and realised what losers most dumb jock jerkboys are.)




Weak socialists. Christ. Tell that to the Russians who defeated the Nazis. Tell that to the Unions that stand up to the Billionaires. Tell that to Lech Walesa. Che Guevara.

There is no statistical correlation between physical strength and political leaning.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 08:55 AM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

This is a correlation study, not a causation study.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 09:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: Painterz

originally posted by: CulturalResilience
I have lost count of how many lonely nice guys I have met, but I don't think I have ever met a lonely charming jerkboy. Once you realise that to understand what women find attractive you have disregard what they say, and instead, observe what they actually do, the irrefutable truth is glaringly obvious. Jocks get women, geeks do not. Of course weak men are more likely to be socialist because they need the protection and safety that comes from state dependency.

Watch as Britney/Tori/Chelsy/etc while away their time waiting for Prince Charming in the bed's of the Black Knights. This dumb jock jerkboy has a notch count that geeks can only dream of, and I wouldn't trade it for the involuntary celibacy that comes with being a weak socialist.



You see, this rather proves my point. Does this website really need people boasting about their alleged sexual conquests to prove they are alpha males unlike those 'weak socialists'? I mean, really, is the average age here now 14?


(Newsflash by the way, Jocks get girls in highschool. Geeks get women in their 20s and onwards, once those women have matured a little and realised what losers most dumb jock jerkboys are.)




Weak socialists. Christ. Tell that to the Russians who defeated the Nazis. Tell that to the Unions that stand up to the Billionaires. Tell that to Lech Walesa. Che Guevara.

There is no statistical correlation between physical strength and political leaning.


That's because younger women come along to take the place of the ones that jocks made use of. The geeks get to marry and pay for what the jocks got for free when the women were younger, hotter, tighter and lighter.

The example you cited are all past tense and are nothing more than commentary when discussing the milquetoast socialist of today.
edit on 15-6-2017 by CulturalResilience because: (no reason given)

edit on 15-6-2017 by CulturalResilience because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 09:09 AM
link   
DP
edit on 15-6-2017 by CulturalResilience because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 09:10 AM
link   
I was 6'2" and two hundred fifty pounds and full of muscle from working construction, not much fat. I tended to be more of a socialist person.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 09:12 AM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

I would say you are missing a chunk. Men who are physically strong also tend to be more self-confident. Not always, but the two do tend to go together because a strong man has confidence in his abilities. A weak man has less, again, not always.

I'd would say that one's confidence in one's ability to provide for self and confidence in self is really what they're trying to measure here.

If you have good confidence in self, then you are less likely be a socialist and feel that you need to force everyone else to help support you because you have confidence in your ability to care for yourself.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 09:17 AM
link   
I'm curious as to why sillyolme hasn't made forty four back to back posts disputing the OP.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 09:37 AM
link   
I gauge male masculinity by those that have a penchant for constantly indulging in "circle jerks"...My scientific study, peer reviewed all over the world.



edit on 15-6-2017 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 09:41 AM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

Why does everyone here think that being a socialist person means relying on others?

How about others relying on them?



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 09:44 AM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

Hardly, just providing anecdotal evidence to support the OP in an amusing way.


I'm actually a big nerd, and far from a vain bodybuilder/jock. I just need functional strength for my work.

I do notice a trend towards more feminine men in my area. Which is one thing in and of itself, but I also notice a drastic loss of the skills of "typical men" in each generation.

Men should be able to change a tire, change oil, tend a wound, throw a punch, start a fire, grill food properly, repair plumbing, hunt and clean their own meat, etc...

I am starting to see a distinct trend towards "Someone else will do it for me, so why learn how take care of it myself." behavior from guys.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 10:03 AM
link   
Socialists.... Che Guevara, Fidel Castro, Vladimir Lennon, James Connolly, Leon Trotsky, Robert hale Merriman, Matin Luther King, Albert Einstein, Helen Keller, Hugo chavez to name but a few.
Hardly shrinking violets and or lesser human beings.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 10:06 AM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

Of course.

These people were indoctrinated from a young age that they get a trophy just for participating.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: rickymouse
I was 6'2" and two hundred fifty pounds and full of muscle from working construction, not much fat. I tended to be more of a socialist person.

Agreed, I used to throw a few grunters around myself once long long ago now when I was fitter and a lot healthier, started my day with 250 pushups and hit the home gym when I got back home every night, I was like a freeze dried chicken and also 6'2", also always been center left socialist (very left compared to today's politics with its resurgent ultra right wing economics.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Chadwickus

If you lived here you might be able to understand.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:11 AM
link   
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss

Here as in the US? I live in a very socialist society...

Some aspects of it are ok, like health care for example, but the dole bludgers, lazy single mums and disinterested indigenous population are what makes it bad.

Anyway, my point is that there is a decent list of socialist people who were strong, influential leaders....not followers.


edit on 15/6/17 by Chadwickus because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: LABTECH767

originally posted by: rickymouse
I was 6'2" and two hundred fifty pounds and full of muscle from working construction, not much fat. I tended to be more of a socialist person.

Agreed, I used to throw a few grunters around myself once long long ago now when I was fitter and a lot healthier, started my day with 250 pushups and hit the home gym when I got back home every night, I was like a freeze dried chicken and also 6'2", also always been center left socialist (very left compared to today's politics with its resurgent ultra right wing economics.


When I was seventeen I used to do three hundred sit-ups in a row every day. Strengthening those muscles is not a good thing, they would cramp and pull on my balls and hurt like hell. The doctor laughed when I went in and said maybe I shouldn't do any more situps because it was strengthening those muscles too much. He was right, I layed off for a couple of days and they disappeared. After a couple of weeks I started back up and of course I got that back again and I quit doing sit ups permanently. I was too embarrassed to tell my parents the second time I had problems, I should have listened to the doctor and not tried going overboard again. A good Finn has to try things twice to make sure that it can't be done.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: pheonix358
a reply to: Xtrozero

And if you did a study involving all of those 800 million men all you would have at the end of the day is a study on Chinese men.

Incidentally, I would not want you to do that study. You have stated that all 800 million men are communist.

Are they
... prove it.


P


I did the study with a large sample size of 1 billion communist men and my conclusions as that communist are small in stature and look Asian... Since Socialist are Communist lite I would give them 10 more pounds on an average....The study in the OP post is dead on correct...



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 11:39 AM
link   
a reply to: cynicalheathen

"That's because younger women come along to take the place of the ones that jocks made use of. The geeks get to marry and pay for what the jocks got for free when the women were younger, hotter, tighter and lighter." Comon man, You gleefully make a statement like this, and then go on to deny being a vain jock. Jocks don't get all the girls, they just get the girls that like jocks.

It's all just peacocking. The hipster guys in their capri-pants, man buns, and meticulously manicured beards are getting plenty of indie/hipster/tattoo'd tail because, lets face it, no matter what most guys say getting laid is pretty foremost in your brain in your twenties. The biological drive you have to lift weights and get ripped is almost identical to their impulse to wear suspenders, trilby's and scarves. The same with their lack of "manly knowhow," it's just not in much demand for the ladies they're after. It's all just a way to stand out from the rest of your competitors.







 
21
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join