It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Study: Physically Weak Men More Likely To Be Socialists

page: 2
21
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 01:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Xtrozero

And if you did a study involving all of those 800 million men all you would have at the end of the day is a study on Chinese men.

Incidentally, I would not want you to do that study. You have stated that all 800 million men are communist.

Are they
... prove it.


P




posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 01:46 AM
link   
a reply to: carewemust

Don't feel threatened. It's a virtual safe space here.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 01:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: murphy22
a reply to: Outlier13
Looks, action and ideology, are different things. I've seen and been around some handsome and buff US. marines, female and male. That couldn't work themselves out of a wet paper bag. Primal essence sounds like a soda product to me. I've seen fat and skinny men out work, Golds Gym commandos. It's a BS study. Click bait.


Looks is one thing, actual strength is another. Low bodyfat, toned muscles usually equates to show.

An actual strongman is another thing entirely. Strongmen aren't typically made in Gold's Gym.

Strength =/= Vanity



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 01:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: toysforadults
All I have to say to this is, hahahahah!

DailyWire



An academic study from researchers at Brunel University London assessed 171 men, looking at their height, weight, overall physical strength and bicep circumference, along with their views on redistribution of wealth and income inequality. The study, published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, ​found that weaker men were more likely to favor socialist policies than stronger men. Exhibit A:


Science duh! I would like to start by saying this is a very honest and accurate assessment, very scientifically done and peer reviewed by everyone in the world. Men who adhere to socialist ideology are weak sissy boys. It's not me saying it it's the scientist!



Right-wingers tend to be less intelligent than left-wingers, and people with low childhood intelligence tend to grow up to have racist and anti-gay views, says a controversial new study.

Conservative politics work almost as a 'gateway' into prejudice against others, say the Canadian academics.

The paper analysed large UK studies which compared childhood intelligence with political views in adulthood across more than 15,000 people. k
Daily Mail


People who lean right in ideology tend to be less intelligent, I mean it's not me saying it, it's the scientist.

...... Maybe there is something to the whole big dumb brute stereotype afterall...




posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 02:04 AM
link   

originally posted by: Outlier13
Stronger males foster the mentality of being self reliant because it is simply at the core of who we are. It's the primal essence.

Those that can...DO. Those that can't...must rely upon others.

I bet plenty of liberals opened this thread and felt threatened.


I opened this thread and felt like I was sitting in a basement somewhere in the US Bible Belt and it reeked of Old Spice
edit on 15-6-2017 by ErrorErrorError because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 02:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: ErrorErrorError

originally posted by: Outlier13
Stronger males foster the mentality of being self reliant because it is simply at the core of who we are. It's the primal essence.

Those that can...DO. Those that can't...must rely upon others.

I bet plenty of liberals opened this thread and felt threatened.


I opened this thread and felt like I was sitting in a basement somewhere in the US Bible Belt and it reeked of Old Spice


Good thing you specified "US Bible Belt" so we didn't get it confused with the many other world known Bible Belts.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 02:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: Outlier13

originally posted by: ErrorErrorError

originally posted by: Outlier13
Stronger males foster the mentality of being self reliant because it is simply at the core of who we are. It's the primal essence.

Those that can...DO. Those that can't...must rely upon others.

I bet plenty of liberals opened this thread and felt threatened.


I opened this thread and felt like I was sitting in a basement somewhere in the US Bible Belt and it reeked of Old Spice


Good thing you specified "US Bible Belt" so we didn't get it confused with the many other world known Bible Belts.


That all you got grandpa ?



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 02:30 AM
link   

originally posted by: ErrorErrorError

originally posted by: Outlier13
Stronger males foster the mentality of being self reliant because it is simply at the core of who we are. It's the primal essence.

Those that can...DO. Those that can't...must rely upon others.

I bet plenty of liberals opened this thread and felt threatened.


I opened this thread and felt like I was sitting in a basement somewhere in the US Bible Belt and it reeked of Old Spice


Interpretation: "Outlier13, your post triggered me so I shall revert to base and talk about my mums basement, where I post from - it's called projection"



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 02:35 AM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

Todd Starnes already covered this last year. Why regurgurate this?



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 03:47 AM
link   
Another innocent try at feeling superior?

So immature and insecure of yourself, deep within, that you need some study with a weak data-base to build upon?

..

Well, then.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 04:00 AM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

I favour (some) social policies.

And I ain't weak..or small...or short.

171 men from one area isn't a very deep pool to draw conclusions from..



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 04:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Outlier13

Threatened?

No, more like..



PS. Fidel Castro was well over 6 foot tall...


edit on 15/6/17 by Chadwickus because: Deep State!



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 04:43 AM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

Absolute rubbish, the majority of Social democrats are working class men whom work or have come from working background's, in other words the physically stronger and so because they have to be to survive and to work.

The idiot that made this claim should be fired, there IQ is obviously under par.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 04:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Kandinsky

I'd think the doodoo heads living in the real world, with hands on experience and working for peanuts to provide for their families, would lean right simply because of the fact they do live in the real world, with real world problems.

lefty university students with chips on their shoulders who think the world owes them for the mere fact they draw breath, who are force fed a false narrative on how the world works according to socialist faux leaders who assume the role of educators, don't have the wherewithal to understand the big scary world, and scream bloody murder at those who make a life for themselves.

And they're usually fed grains and noodles, and a workout is carrying a sign.




posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 05:12 AM
link   
a reply to: ErrorErrorError



I opened this thread and felt like I was sitting in a basement somewhere in the US Bible Belt and it reeked of Old Spice


so did you realize that your in some new york basement that reeks of hi karate instead.




posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 05:13 AM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

Well, there aren't that many jobs that require muscle any more.
I doubt you'd find a weak miner or steel worker back in the '70s.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 05:30 AM
link   
a reply to: SprocketUK




Well, there aren't that many jobs that require muscle any more. I doubt you'd find a weak miner or steel worker back in the '70s.


yes you are correct, there are many jobs that require physical strength ask Mike Rowe (Dirty Jobs). lets see how many we can name, i'll start.

construction workers, firefighters, police officers, some truck driving jobs, warehouse workers, cargo and freight workers,
landscapers.

that's eight there are plenty more if you think about that require physical strength.




edit on 15-6-2017 by hounddoghowlie because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 05:35 AM
link   
Oh for heaven's sake, what is happening to ATS.

If ever we need evidence this place is turning into an Alt-Right echo chamber, we get horsepoo articles like this posted.

What happened to 'deny ignorance'? Instead let's all have another thread where the alt-right get to slap each other on the butts and tell each other how much more manly they are than everybody else. Geezus. Pathetic.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 06:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Painterz
Oh for heaven's sake, what is happening to ATS.

If ever we need evidence this place is turning into an Alt-Right echo chamber, we get horsepoo articles like this posted.

What happened to 'deny ignorance'? Instead let's all have another thread where the alt-right get to slap each other on the butts and tell each other how much more manly they are than everybody else. Geezus. Pathetic.
That sounds more like a lefty thing to do really.



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 06:53 AM
link   
I have lost count of how many lonely nice guys I have met, but I don't think I have ever met a lonely charming jerkboy. Once you realise that to understand what women find attractive you have disregard what they say, and instead, observe what they actually do, the irrefutable truth is glaringly obvious. Jocks get women, geeks do not. Of course weak men are more likely to be socialist because they need the protection and safety that comes from state dependency.

Watch as Britney/Tori/Chelsy/etc while away their time waiting for Prince Charming in the bed's of the Black Knights. This dumb jock jerkboy has a notch count that geeks can only dream of, and I wouldn't trade it for the involuntary celibacy that comes with being a weak socialist.



new topics

top topics



 
21
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join