It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Breaking: Senate Judiciary Committee Opens Investigation Into Loretta Lynch DOJ, FBI, & Clinton!

page: 4
78
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 09:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: shooterbrody

T
its like comey never testified
its like comeys boss did not review his performance and recommend he be shown the door



Exactly.

Comey was even under review for months,
Nothing to do with Trump!

But they don't even want to talk about that one!



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 09:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: matafuchs
"My style of deal-making is quite simple and straightforward. I aim very high, and then I just keep pushing and pushing and pushing to get what I'm after. Sometimes I settle for less than I sought, but in most cases I still end up with what I want...." DT


I mean, what happens when they bring in a former POTUS to testify? Has this ever happened? Oh, and I mean O not Bill....


It certainly would appear Lynch was taking orders from someone!

"I'm with Her"



posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 09:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: RickinVa
If it is proven that Lynch impeded the Clinton investigation, then the previous investigation should be declared null and void and revoke all immunity clauses that were granted.

I say a fresh investigation of the Clinton email server would bring a different result with a new FBI Director and a new AG.



Especially since there was nothing gained by the immunity given.
Looking back it seems the entire entourage was given a
pass, set up from the beginning!

Is that a possibility, from a legal standpoint, to reopen
that investigation?



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 07:45 AM
link   
LOL, another 'investigation'! Or how they put it...

... a probe into allegations that procedures in some 'other' investigation were violated .

Yay DOJ leading the charge, investigating--

I mean 'probing', itself.

Use lots of tax payer lube.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 08:05 AM
link   
Take 'em all down. Comey, Clinton, Lynch, Trump, all of 'em. Only one of 'em really will have any impact and that's the guy that's president. So have at it.

I guess the Right will feel like they did something taking out unemployed Democrats.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 08:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: RickinVa
If it is proven that Lynch impeded the Clinton investigation, then the previous investigation should be declared null and void and revoke all immunity clauses that were granted.

I say a fresh investigation of the Clinton email server would bring a different result with a new FBI Director and a new AG.



Especially since there was nothing gained by the immunity given.
Looking back it seems the entire entourage was given a
pass, set up from the beginning!

Is that a possibility, from a legal standpoint, to reopen
that investigation?


I don't see why not. If the old AG and FBI director committed obstruction of justice by handing out crooked immunity deals, then justice demands that those immunity deals get ripped up and the guilty parties prosecuted.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 09:26 AM
link   
a reply to: toysforadults

Unfortunately it won't be Gowdy he is invthe House not the senate



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 11:12 AM
link   
Breaking: Senate Judiciary Committee Opens Investigation Into Loretta Lynch DOJ, FBI, & Clinton!

NOW people that is karmic justice.




edit on 16-6-2017 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 12:25 PM
link   


Of course, the subject line of this thread is nonsense. Not at all what the article says.

Trump and his minions are the ones to be worried. They're in the hot seat now.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 02:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr

Yay DOJ leading the charge, investigating--

I mean 'probing', itself.



Well at least it is money that can't be spent on endless wars, right?



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 02:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships
This could be the big one that finally gets a few big fish.
Notice this is not in the news?



Yes... I notice... this is not in the news. lol



But this is...

And it appears to be related to what you're talking about...

Trump tries to change the topic to Clinton after report of possible obstruction probe
www.yahoo.com...



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 04:33 PM
link   
a reply to: spiritualzombie

Yes, The media can't resist Trump's Tweets!



Have you figured it out yet?



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 08:16 PM
link   
And now Trump has lit the fires on Twitter.

The Persistence....



posted on Jun, 17 2017 @ 08:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: intrptr

Yay DOJ leading the charge, investigating--

I mean 'probing', itself.



Well at least it is money that can't be spent on endless wars, right?

Endless debt, endless war, endless probing.... more lube please.



posted on Jun, 17 2017 @ 08:55 AM
link   
About frigging time!
I cannot tell you how many times members of the Obama administration flaunted illegal behavior as if to say they were untouchable. Her and her ilk are out of touch, not out of reach. It's heartening to know that justice still means something in the US regardless of who you are and what position you may hold.

To think Nixon was brought down over something far less serious than what Lynch, Holder and O's goons at the IRS have done.



posted on Jun, 17 2017 @ 09:05 AM
link   
Thought it useful to post Grassleys FULL letter to Diane Feinstein. Selected elements of that letter have been used to try and spin his investigation to make Trump the focus, but it is clear that his main focus is the DoJ under Obama.

There is no suggestion he is investigating Trump for obstruction of justice.




edit on 17/6/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 17 2017 @ 01:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Asktheanimals

To think Nixon was brought down over something far less serious than what Lynch, Holder and O's goons at the IRS have done.


Far less. Comey, Lynch, Bill Clinton, they must
all be held accountable. Calls for a special,counsel!



posted on Jun, 18 2017 @ 09:55 AM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

More like praying she would win...

Now he should be praying they don't investigate the $65,000 in pizza and hotdogs that were illegally delivered to the White House on taxpayers dime...



posted on Jun, 26 2017 @ 07:56 PM
link   
I bet the Democrats HATE COMEY again, LOL.

""Judge Andrew Napolitano weighed in this morning, saying Lynch has a "lot of explaining to do" following former FBI Director James Comey's bombshell testimony to the Senate. 

Leading Senate Democrat Dianne Feinstein (CA) said last week that the Judiciary Committee should look into why Lynch instructed Comey to refer to the Hillary Clinton email probe as a "matter," not an investigation. 

Comey told the Senate that the directive "concerned" him because it was consistent with the Clinton campaign inaccurately calling the investigation a "security review."

"Comey laid out a case for misconduct in office for Loretta Lynch," said Napolitano, adding that attorneys general usually do not choose to investigate their predecessors.""

insider.foxnews.com...



posted on Jun, 26 2017 @ 09:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: burntheships

I wonder how the DOJ review of Comeys shenanigans is going? Lots of people staying under the radar, until today...

oig.justice.gov...



Curious Sublime, why is that dated 01/12/2017? Have they been holding it back until now???



new topics

top topics



 
78
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join