It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Wapo Claims Mueller Changed Investigation to Obstruction of Justice

page: 9
23
<< 6  7  8    10 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 10:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

But Comeys actually was under oath.
edit on 6162017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 10:46 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

But Comeys actuallywas under oath.


Yes he lied under oath. That was my point.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 10:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: theantediluvian

🎤🎶 in the style of Rod Stewart...
Have I told you lately that I love you.


Lol. Seriously though great response. Stern but not harsh.
You should consider journalism for a career.


The only thing I agree with you on....They both seem very adept at making stuff



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 11:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

You think the former director of the FBI lied... under oath...

So by that can I assume you think trump is telling the truth?


And you used what data to come to this conclusion?

Truly what did you weigh? History? Reputation?



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 11:43 AM
link   
a reply to: marg6043

Pssst Marg baby....trump and his family were some of the biggest donors to the Clinton's.
Just thought I'd put that out there.

It doesn't mean anything. Washington is a small town.
Everybody knows everybody else.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 11:45 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Grambler

You think the former director of the FBI lied... under oath...

So by that can I assume you think trump is telling the truth?


And you used what data to come to this conclusion?

Truly what did you weigh? History? Reputation?


Trumps comments have notihing to do with rather or not comey lied.

Did you read my post?

Comey said he leaked the content of his memos in response to Trump tweet under oath.

We know that the NYT published an article detail the contents of the memos the day BEFORE Trumps tweet.

Trumps comments are irrelevant to the fact that Comey lied under oath about this.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 11:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

I posted a link in one of these threads detailing that article. There are a couple of places where it is obvious that the Times authors were copying phrases out of Comey's notes. And this is an article dated the day before Trump's tweet, so realistically they must have gotten the notes at least a day or two earlier than that.

Sorry, but there is ample reason to believe that yes, Comey did commit perjury.
edit on 16-6-2017 by AndyFromMichigan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 12:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Grambler

Comey did not lie under oath. You have your series of events mixed up.
Sorry.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 12:24 PM
link   
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Only to some people.
Looks up....



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 12:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme
because he is comeys mentor and comey leaked to ny times to cause a special prosecutor to be assigned and he recommended mueller the two of them have been colluding since day one . so mueller if he switching it from russian colusion to obstruction of justice means sessions could jump in and swat them down.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 12:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolmebecause comey said so and he worked under mueller in the past.




posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 12:57 PM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolmeyes but if it is found that mueller is leaking to press just like comey he will have a good reason also if he switched from russian investigation to obstruction it opens the door for sessions to take back over since he would no longer have conflict of interests .



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: The GUT

Jealous?



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 01:33 PM
link   
a reply to: proteus33

Everybody knows everybody in DC. No one would qualify according to Trump supporters standards.
It's nonsense.
And you are only repeating what you saw from someone else by saying this. I've only read it about nine times just today.
It's dumb and doesn't hold water.
Go think up another excuse.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 01:33 PM
link   
a reply to: proteus33

He's not. It's a ridiculous idea.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 05:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Dfairlite

Why would Mueller have to recuse himself?


Best buddy with Comey.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 10:01 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvianwhat investigation it looks like they could not find evidence of colusion between trump and the ruskies or of them hacking the dnc for one because the dnc would not let them examine their servers but i digress so they decided to switch it up and accuse the president of obstruction of justice because he fired comey the clown who openly admitted he leaked to new york times to cause a special investigator to be appointed and i wonder if he personally recommended mueller. look i am just a country bumpkin but if you told me you purposely did something like this to cause an outcome you wanted to me that is very wrong. as a head of fbi he should have his guys investigating not leaking to press, going outside of chain of command to force an outcome. yes i know by puntuation is crappy sorry i am a country bumpkin like i said.




posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 10:18 PM
link   
a reply to: Eldest808

Another one.
What you guys like pass around a memo or something?



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 10:22 PM
link   
a reply to: proteus33

Oh you got the company line down pat.
Somebody's been studying.



posted on Jun, 17 2017 @ 12:46 PM
link   
Ok, it looks like rosenstein will recuse himself. Get ready for Rachel Brand! She's great and she'll get this crap back where it belongs.

Rosenstein will recuse because trump outed him as a potential witness. By recommending that trump fire comey, rosenstein will be questioned by investigators. "why did you recommend he fire comey then open an investigation into firing comey?"

I expect Rachel will severely limit the scope of the special counsel. The left will freak, but they have no argument. If rosenstein doesn't recuse, expect him to be fired.




top topics



 
23
<< 6  7  8    10 >>

log in

join