It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: introvert
I won't pretend it was a smart thing to tweet, because of course the media wouldn't bother to check what the context was they'll just report "this is what he meant" and get embarrassed later. They seem to enjoy it.
Asking the White House for comment, a lost art.
The media just reported what Trump said in his tweet. This is on Trump. If there was more context to what he said, it is his responsibility to be specific, or the media will report exactly what he said.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: face23785
If true that he was referring to WaPo story, Trump is a bigger idiot than I thought. Why would he tweet that without more context if that is what he truly meant?
Of course he was referring to the WaPo story. The other option is that the SC have told him about their investigation and what it is about. Extremely unlikely.
I suspect that Rosenstein's statement was to calm people down - take his advice (as should the President) and don't believe newspaper articles citing unnamed sources.
If he was referring to the WaPo story and it is not true, why did he call it a witch hunt?
He did not say, "WaPo fake news on me being under investigation. Media witch hunt".
He said: "I am being investigated for firing the FBI Director by the man who told me to fire the FBI Director! Witch Hunt"
Sounds to me like the unnamed source familiar with issue, who said Trump was referring to the WaPo story, came out to play damage control after Trump got pissed and exposed himself on twitter.
Also, why are you believing an unnamed source that this was in reference to the WaPo story?
So much hypocrisy lately.
The basic fact remains, there is no word that Trump is being investigated by the SC.
A WaPo story about interviews and a guess about the reason is nothing more than speculation, something you seem very eager to participate in. Perhaps you should reread Rosenstein's caution about news stories, as you've been burned so many times relying on the MSM to push propaganda.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: introvert
And, yes, he is under investigation.
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: introvert
Let's not pretend you can say exactly what you mean in 143 character. I will agree that if he can't be specific enough, he should probably not write a tweet about it. Saying he has zero credibility is a little much, especially if you still believe the media with how many times they've been wrong.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: introvert
Let's not pretend you can say exactly what you mean in 143 character. I will agree that if he can't be specific enough, he should probably not write a tweet about it. Saying he has zero credibility is a little much, especially if you still believe the media with how many times they've been wrong.
The media has nothing to do with Trump's own words and actions. He is responsible for that.
The unnamed source's comment about it referring to the WaPo story does not make sense, given the context of what Trump tweeted.
He specifically referred to who was in charge of the investigation and called it a witch hunt.
Proof please.
My position is simply that we don't know and the last verifiable information we have is that Trump is not and never has been under investigation.
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: introvert
Show me the official statement that the FBI under Mueller is investigating now Trump for obstruction of justice.
I can not find it.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: introvert
Let's not pretend you can say exactly what you mean in 143 character. I will agree that if he can't be specific enough, he should probably not write a tweet about it. Saying he has zero credibility is a little much, especially if you still believe the media with how many times they've been wrong.
The media has nothing to do with Trump's own words and actions. He is responsible for that.
The unnamed source's comment about it referring to the WaPo story does not make sense, given the context of what Trump tweeted.
He specifically referred to who was in charge of the investigation and called it a witch hunt.
What makes no sense is why you would believe that Trump has been told that he is under investigation... a point you have dodged.. conveniently.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth
Proof please.
You know very well that he is under investigation by the Judiciary committee.
My position is simply that we don't know and the last verifiable information we have is that Trump is not and never has been under investigation.
Yes, we do know. You admitted that he was under investigation yesterday by congress.
Are you now denying that?
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: introvert
Let's not pretend you can say exactly what you mean in 143 character. I will agree that if he can't be specific enough, he should probably not write a tweet about it. Saying he has zero credibility is a little much, especially if you still believe the media with how many times they've been wrong.
The media has nothing to do with Trump's own words and actions. He is responsible for that.
The unnamed source's comment about it referring to the WaPo story does not make sense, given the context of what Trump tweeted.
He specifically referred to who was in charge of the investigation and called it a witch hunt.
What makes no sense is why you would believe that Trump has been told that he is under investigation... a point you have dodged.. conveniently.
Why does that matter whatsoever? He can simply ask if he is under investigation.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth
Proof please.
You know very well that he is under investigation by the Judiciary committee.
My position is simply that we don't know and the last verifiable information we have is that Trump is not and never has been under investigation.
Yes, we do know. You admitted that he was under investigation yesterday by congress.
Are you now denying that?
This thread is about the SC.
The Judiciary is not investigating any crime and like I said many times - the only avenue open is impeachment. We'll see where Grassley goes with that.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: introvert
Show me the official statement that the FBI under Mueller is investigating now Trump for obstruction of justice.
I can not find it.
Look at Trump's tweet. He said he was under investigation.
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: face23785
a reply to: introvert
Let's not pretend you can say exactly what you mean in 143 character. I will agree that if he can't be specific enough, he should probably not write a tweet about it. Saying he has zero credibility is a little much, especially if you still believe the media with how many times they've been wrong.
The media has nothing to do with Trump's own words and actions. He is responsible for that.
The unnamed source's comment about it referring to the WaPo story does not make sense, given the context of what Trump tweeted.
He specifically referred to who was in charge of the investigation and called it a witch hunt.
What makes no sense is why you would believe that Trump has been told that he is under investigation... a point you have dodged.. conveniently.
Why does that matter whatsoever? He can simply ask if he is under investigation.
...and he will not be told. There is not a chance that the SC would tell him - ESPECIALLY if he was.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth
Proof please.
You know very well that he is under investigation by the Judiciary committee.
My position is simply that we don't know and the last verifiable information we have is that Trump is not and never has been under investigation.
Yes, we do know. You admitted that he was under investigation yesterday by congress.
Are you now denying that?
This thread is about the SC.
The Judiciary is not investigating any crime and like I said many times - the only avenue open is impeachment. We'll see where Grassley goes with that.
The poster I replied to did not specify SC or JC. Fact is, he's under investigation.