It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: justb0b
Not exactly
Is similar with metallic outer layer over a plastic inner insulation layer
Problem is in insulation layer . Dubai material used poly urethane aka solid napalm notorious for speed at which burns
Problem is that as material burn and fire travels up the side of building the fire can enter the interior by windows or
ventilation openings sparking fires on multiple floors
originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: violet
What pisses me off about this is how many were told to stay in their apartments. Those who left, survived.
Whomever told people to stay inside should be charged with murder.
originally posted by: audubon
a reply to: MysticPearl
I think the 'stay put' advice was written with the (fairly natural) assumption that any fire would start inside the building rather than outside it, in which case it's not as bizarre as it seems. Staying in your flat would normally prevent you getting trapped in a smoke-filled communal area. The flats' front doors were of the usual fire-retardant standard.
originally posted by: CranialSponge
Heartwrenching that 12 people died needlessly.
I can't even imagine the horror of waking up to something like this in the middle of the night. Half asleep in your pajamas, not knowing how bad the situation is all around you, how to get you and your family out as quickly as possible....
Ugh.
Heads are going to roll for this one, big time.
originally posted by: audubon
originally posted by: violet
True except the fire did start inside.
Yeah, poorly-worded on my part; you know what I'm getting at.
What pisses me off about this is how many were told to stay in their apartments. Those who left, survived.
Four people died in the superheated, smoke-filled stairwell of an Upper West Side high-rise yesterday as they tried to escape a fire that started in a 19th-floor apartment where the family of the actor Macaulay Culkin lived
originally posted by: firerescue
a reply to: 23432
I personally think that this was a delibrate arson to force May's [read:Queen] resignation.
Other than that you are correct .
500 dead is hard to forget, if true.
As I pointed out - ignorance does not a conspiracy make......
Death toll is not 500, final total , while horrific, will be several dozen
As for arson - looking like case of improperly installed insulation material, material not fire resistant and
installed leaving gaps which allowed fire to travel up side of building
Local council to save money used material not fire resistant - such material as banned in US and Germany for
high raise buildings, badly installed
As it most cases of mass fire deaths (Triangle Shirtwaist, Coconut Grove Night Club, Beverly Hills Supper Club, Etc)
cause is flammable materials allowed to accumulate with blocked/locked exits
originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: 23432
If that was the case i imagine it would have been done before the general election.
The only conspiracy here is that TPTB could not be arsed to shell out an additional £5000 for the appropriate cladding.
And it serves there purpose at the end of the day because now the monstrous death trap these poor and underprivileged people were forced to live in, and die in if truth be told, will inevitably be removed thus no longer be an eyesore or stain on the area.
End of the day this could have been prevented but it was not, and just down to the law of averages alone it was apt to happen sometime.