It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

D.C. and Maryland to sue President Trump, alleging breach of constitutional oath

page: 22
26
<< 19  20  21   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 06:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Devino

It's not always possible for a businessman to sell off his business. Would you sell off your house to become president? It is very unlikely for a foreign government to deposit cash to the president. Today's world is very different from the 1700s when the emoluments clause was drafted. Today with so much technology and information the media would know every cash deposited to the president from a foreign government. Back in the 1700s this would have been very difficult to determine.

Trump resigned from every business. He passed the torch to his sons. Even if a foreign government stays at a Trump hotel, it is not emolument to Trump but it would be to his sons.

money.cnn.com...
edit on 15-6-2017 by allsee4eye because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 15 2017 @ 10:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I saw that article as well. I don't care what you call it, doesn't mean you are right. Just like any link to AP, NYT, WSJ , CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, MSNBC are Fake news now.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 03:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Devino

Well, this is the thing. Not only is the awarding body not a body allied to any particular nation, meaning its is not a foreign power, but I think he believed that it would have been gauche to take the money, being as wealthy as he is.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 06:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Sure it is..... you are claiming something is real, it isn't, this was a thread about a fake future event, this is exactly what fake news is....

And you take the bait every time.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 07:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: fatkid
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Sure it is..... you are claiming something is real, it isn't, this was a thread about a fake future event, this is exactly what fake news is....

And you take the bait every time.


Speculation on what may happen in the future based on something definitively happening now is not fake news no matter how you want to pretend otherwise.



posted on Jun, 16 2017 @ 01:46 PM
link   

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: fatkid
a reply to: Krazysh0t

Sure it is..... you are claiming something is real, it isn't, this was a thread about a fake future event, this is exactly what fake news is....

And you take the bait every time.


Speculation on what may happen in the future based on something definitively happening now is not fake news no matter how you want to pretend otherwise.


A logical fallacy...

Post hoc ergo propter hoc.



new topics

top topics
 
26
<< 19  20  21   >>

log in

join