It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Preet Bharara: 'Absolutely evidence' to begin an obstruction case against Trump

page: 4
2
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 07:33 AM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

Don't you #ing tell me to be quiet.
Big mistake.




posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 07:34 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth




There is no law broken.

You don't know that , If it is found the President or his team colluded with a foreign power that is a crime which can carry the death penalty.
It is treason.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 07:35 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

Bull#


If you think your Constitution is bull# it only confirms what many already know about the left.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 07:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme

I just did, unless you have some relevant and factual material that engages in some good discussions, otherwise, off with you!



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 07:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: UKTruth




There is no law broken.

You don't know that , If it is found the President or his team colluded with a foreign power that is a crime which can carry the death penalty.
It is treason.


The president is not under investigation for collusion - and no, working with Russia on a campaign is not a crime, even if some of his campaign members did it.
Speculating on what law could have been broken is not the same as saying a law has been broken.
edit on 12/6/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 07:49 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth




The president is not under investigation for collusion - and no, working with Russia on a campaign is not a crime.

So , they're investigating the team but not the leader of the team ... makes no sense to me.

The FBI is currently investigating Trump’s campaign team and his associates and whether they played any role in colluding with Russia’s attempts to influence the 2016 election. Former adviser NSA Flynn was being investigated for his contacts with Russian officials.
www.newsweek.com...



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 07:54 AM
link   
a reply to: gortex

That has literally been on the news all week.
President Trump ISNT being investigated, his team is. Since the start of this BS, it has been that way.

Now that reality has hit you, how come comey keopted that too himself? This was Trumps "cloud", he knew the MSM would be actively seeking fire and ammo and this whole Trump being investigated was a huge MSM talking point. So why did comey keep that to himself? Hmmm?



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 08:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123




Now that reality has hit you,

First you investigate the minions then you move on to the President if evidence is found , no point creating a situation if there's no call for it , that's the reality as I see it.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 08:02 AM
link   
a reply to: gortex

Ok, but who decides that? LEO.

As far as we know, factually, there is currently NO collusion.

But innocent until proven guilty, right? So we'll ride this train together and cross that bridge when it comes to that.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 08:11 AM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123




As far as we know

As far as we know but as most of the information is held behind a wall of official secrecy so we don't know much , I would like to know what Comey told the senate intelligence committee behind closed doors that he couldn't say in public.

As for crossing the bridge , let's hope it hasn't collapsed into the ravine and we both make it across safely , the alternative doesn't bear thinking about.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 08:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: Arnie123




As far as we know

As far as we know but as most of the information is held behind a wall of official secrecy so we don't know much , I would like to know what Comey told the senate intelligence committee behind closed doors that he couldn't say in public.

As for crossing the bridge , let's hope it hasn't collapsed into the ravine and we both make it across safely , the alternative doesn't bear thinking about.



Well Senator Manchin said after that closed meeting that there was nothing to suggest collusion with Russia - so there is that.
edit on 12/6/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 08:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: UKTruth




The president is not under investigation for collusion - and no, working with Russia on a campaign is not a crime.

So , they're investigating the team but not the leader of the team ... makes no sense to me.

The FBI is currently investigating Trump’s campaign team and his associates and whether they played any role in colluding with Russia’s attempts to influence the 2016 election. Former adviser NSA Flynn was being investigated for his contacts with Russian officials.
www.newsweek.com...



Whether it makes sense to you or not is a non issue. We were told that Trump is not under investigation. That is after nearly a year. If they had found something to link any activity to a campaign member with Trump's knowledge or involvement, Trump would be under investigation. Will they find something on Trump whilst investigating an individual tied to his campaign? Who knows, but right now Trump is simply not under investigation for collusion.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 11:12 AM
link   
a reply to: jtma508

Perhaps not, but my Intuition has a pretty good track record so lets just go with that.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 04:21 PM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

Ok.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 04:24 PM
link   
a reply to: Arnie123

I'm pretty sure Comey hinted that there is an obstruction of justice and abuse of power investigation going on now.
Oh look you didn't get rid of me with your silly dismissal.
Looks like you don't get to tell me where I can and cannot post.
Power hungry men are snacks for me babe.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 05:19 PM
link   
a reply to: gortex

It should. Last I checked people are autonomous beings and often act on their own, for their own reasons even.

Should we be investigating Trump for Comey's memo leaks, too? After all, Comey worked for Trump. Trump must have had something to do with Comey's decision to leak.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 05:35 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Really because it was revealed that they talked about a third undisclosed meeting with Kislyak and possible perjury charges. When asked about why he assumed Sessions would recuse himself.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 05:43 PM
link   
a reply to: ketsuko

What did Comey leak? . His personal notes about a conversation he was a part of.
Recording a conversation in DC is legal as long as one party is aware. Written recordings apply.
But good trump try.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 08:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: ketsuko

What did Comey leak? . His personal notes about a conversation he was a part of.
Recording a conversation in DC is legal as long as one party is aware. Written recordings apply.
But good trump try.


Those memos are government property, not Comey's private property. My work emails, even the ones I make for personal reasons, are the property of my place of work which is why I don't discuss embarrassing things on them.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 08:32 PM
link   
Follow the money
Show the butthurt

" You'll never work in this town again....Ar,ar,ar,ar. "

www.buzzfeed.com...

Buck



new topics

top topics



 
2
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join