It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Amid growing controversy, Sessions abruptly cancels public testimony

page: 4
16
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 11 2017 @ 07:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: alphabetaone
Jim Comey? Why should he recuse himself for doing his job? His only error with regard to that is in not telling Lynch to do hers and carrying the burden.


Because of his past and present links to the Clintons and the Clinton foundation.



posted on Jun, 11 2017 @ 07:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: alphabetaone
Jim Comey? Why should he recuse himself for doing his job? His only error with regard to that is in not telling Lynch to do hers and carrying the burden.


Because of his past and present links to the Clintons and the Clinton foundation.


So why should Jim Comey have felt it necessary to recuse himself? As an independent body, no one from the FBI should find themselves in a position that they should not be able to investigate anything domestically. In fact, they are remiss if they do feel that way.


(post by anonfamily removed for a serious terms and conditions violation)

posted on Jun, 11 2017 @ 08:51 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Jun, 11 2017 @ 09:01 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Jun, 11 2017 @ 09:13 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Jun, 11 2017 @ 09:14 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Jun, 11 2017 @ 09:41 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Jun, 11 2017 @ 10:03 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Jun, 11 2017 @ 10:23 PM
link   

Could we please.....


get back on topic??

Go After the Ball, Not the Player!
You are responsible for your own posts.



and, as always:

Do NOT reply to this post!!
edit on Sun Jun 11 2017 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 11 2017 @ 10:28 PM
link   
 




 




edit on Sun Jun 11 2017 by DontTreadOnMe because: Mod Note: Do Not Evade the Automatic Censors



posted on Jun, 11 2017 @ 10:36 PM
link   

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: alphabetaone
Jim Comey? Why should he recuse himself for doing his job? His only error with regard to that is in not telling Lynch to do hers and carrying the burden.


Because of his past and present links to the Clintons and the Clinton foundation.


So why should Jim Comey have felt it necessary to recuse himself? As an independent body, no one from the FBI should find themselves in a position that they should not be able to investigate anything domestically. In fact, they are remiss if they do feel that way.



Because of his past and present links to the Clintons and the Clinton foundation.



posted on Jun, 11 2017 @ 11:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: alphabetaone
Jim Comey? Why should he recuse himself for doing his job? His only error with regard to that is in not telling Lynch to do hers and carrying the burden.


Because of his past and present links to the Clintons and the Clinton foundation.


So why should Jim Comey have felt it necessary to recuse himself? As an independent body, no one from the FBI should find themselves in a position that they should not be able to investigate anything domestically. In fact, they are remiss if they do feel that way.



Because of his past and present links to the Clintons and the Clinton foundation.


Repetition is not a valuable commodity in this discourse. You're not showing any links and there's a good reason for that. The only link's that are available don't really help you make the argument that youre trying to make, and those are of Jim Comey doing his job as the FBI director. The onus Lynch placed upon him has nothing to do with him or any alleged links that you can dream up as they are conspiracy theory at best which is also precisely why the select committees are not giving them any credence nor is Bob Mueller. It seems only a very few out in the world among which you seem to be a part of that dwindling minority. Believe what you want, logic is on the side of critical thinking, not conspiracy theory.



posted on Jun, 11 2017 @ 11:44 PM
link   
a reply to: alphabetaone

What has robert mueller said?



posted on Jun, 11 2017 @ 11:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: alphabetaone

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: alphabetaone
Jim Comey? Why should he recuse himself for doing his job? His only error with regard to that is in not telling Lynch to do hers and carrying the burden.


Because of his past and present links to the Clintons and the Clinton foundation.


So why should Jim Comey have felt it necessary to recuse himself? As an independent body, no one from the FBI should find themselves in a position that they should not be able to investigate anything domestically. In fact, they are remiss if they do feel that way.



Because of his past and present links to the Clintons and the Clinton foundation.


Repetition is not a valuable commodity in this discourse. You're not showing any links and there's a good reason for that.

The only link's that are available don't really help you make the argument that youre trying to make, and those are of Jim Comey doing his job as the FBI director.

The onus Lynch placed upon him has nothing to do with him or any alleged links that you can dream up as they are conspiracy theory at best which is also precisely why the select committees are not giving them any credence nor is Bob Mueller. It seems only a very few out in the world among which you seem to be a part of that dwindling minority. Believe what you want, logic is on the side of critical thinking, not conspiracy theory.





Seriously, has he done his job at all besides throwing martha stewart in jail?

You want to know about comey? Listen to this.












posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 12:39 AM
link   
a reply to: burgerbuddy

The inquisition has backfired on the Dems.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 10:39 AM
link   
Welp, Session will testify publicly, it appears, Tuesday at 2:30.


Attorney General Jeff Sessions will appear before the Senate Intelligence Committee for an open hearing Tuesday, the committee announced Monday.

Sessions requested that the hearing be public, a Justice Department spokesperson said in a statement Monday.

"The Attorney General has requested that this hearing be public. He believes it is important for the American people to hear the truth directly from him and looks forward to answering the committee's questions tomorrow," the statement read.


This should be interesting.

Link



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 11:24 AM
link   
a reply to: olaru12

You guys are funny. If I once wanted to hold Trump to the same level of critique as other leaders when he first got on, now I would rather him plough through opposition regardless of consequences.

Really, emotional knee jerk reactions are like butts.

The ones I take after are the ones whose reasons dont consist of emotional discord.

So nausiating.....I hate you american journalism.


edit on 6 12 2017 by tadaman because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 01:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Liquesence

He's still testifying. Fake News.



posted on Jun, 12 2017 @ 01:15 PM
link   
a reply to: tadaman




So nausiating.....I hate you american journalism.


Then create your own media outlet and tell it the way you see it.

Alex Jones went from a mickymouse cable access call in channel and created an multi million empire based on BS.

en.wikipedia.org...

I'm in a TV studio as we speak...Join us!!



edit on 12-6-2017 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
16
<< 1  2  3    5 >>

log in

join