It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
Jim Comey? Why should he recuse himself for doing his job? His only error with regard to that is in not telling Lynch to do hers and carrying the burden.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: alphabetaone
Jim Comey? Why should he recuse himself for doing his job? His only error with regard to that is in not telling Lynch to do hers and carrying the burden.
Because of his past and present links to the Clintons and the Clinton foundation.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: alphabetaone
Jim Comey? Why should he recuse himself for doing his job? His only error with regard to that is in not telling Lynch to do hers and carrying the burden.
Because of his past and present links to the Clintons and the Clinton foundation.
So why should Jim Comey have felt it necessary to recuse himself? As an independent body, no one from the FBI should find themselves in a position that they should not be able to investigate anything domestically. In fact, they are remiss if they do feel that way.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: alphabetaone
Jim Comey? Why should he recuse himself for doing his job? His only error with regard to that is in not telling Lynch to do hers and carrying the burden.
Because of his past and present links to the Clintons and the Clinton foundation.
So why should Jim Comey have felt it necessary to recuse himself? As an independent body, no one from the FBI should find themselves in a position that they should not be able to investigate anything domestically. In fact, they are remiss if they do feel that way.
Because of his past and present links to the Clintons and the Clinton foundation.
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: alphabetaone
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: alphabetaone
Jim Comey? Why should he recuse himself for doing his job? His only error with regard to that is in not telling Lynch to do hers and carrying the burden.
Because of his past and present links to the Clintons and the Clinton foundation.
So why should Jim Comey have felt it necessary to recuse himself? As an independent body, no one from the FBI should find themselves in a position that they should not be able to investigate anything domestically. In fact, they are remiss if they do feel that way.
Because of his past and present links to the Clintons and the Clinton foundation.
Repetition is not a valuable commodity in this discourse. You're not showing any links and there's a good reason for that.
The only link's that are available don't really help you make the argument that youre trying to make, and those are of Jim Comey doing his job as the FBI director.
The onus Lynch placed upon him has nothing to do with him or any alleged links that you can dream up as they are conspiracy theory at best which is also precisely why the select committees are not giving them any credence nor is Bob Mueller. It seems only a very few out in the world among which you seem to be a part of that dwindling minority. Believe what you want, logic is on the side of critical thinking, not conspiracy theory.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions will appear before the Senate Intelligence Committee for an open hearing Tuesday, the committee announced Monday.
Sessions requested that the hearing be public, a Justice Department spokesperson said in a statement Monday.
"The Attorney General has requested that this hearing be public. He believes it is important for the American people to hear the truth directly from him and looks forward to answering the committee's questions tomorrow," the statement read.
So nausiating.....I hate you american journalism.