It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Just when you thought Obama’s disastrous Iran deal couldn’t get any worse, we learn that in order to protect the bad deal, Obama systematically disbanded units investigating Iran’s terror-funding networks. Not only that, but he also disbanded units investigating the state funding of terrorists by Syria and Venezuela.
The Obama administration “systematically disbanded” law enforcement investigative units across the federal government focused on disrupting Iranian, Syrian, and Venezuelan terrorism financing networks out of concern the work could cause friction with Iranian officials and scuttle the nuclear deal with Iran, according to a former U.S. official who spent decades dismantling terrorist financial networks.
David Asher, who previously served as an adviser to Gen. John Allen at the Defense and State Departments, told the House Foreign Affairs Committee Thursday that top officials across several key law enforcement and intelligence agencies in the Obama administration “systematically disbanded” law enforcement activities targeting the terrorism financing operations of Iran, Hezbollah, and Venezuela in the lead-up to and during the nuclear negotiations with Tehran.
“Senior leadership, presiding, directing, and overseeing various sections [of these agencies] and portions of the U.S. intelligence community systematically disbanded any internal or external stakeholder action that threatened to derail the administration’s policy agenda focused on Iran,” he testified.
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: xuenchen
Ok, so Obama tried to protect the Iran deal.
Can you explain why the Iran deal is bad? Furthermore, can you explain what other options the US had given world opinion towards the previous sanctions plan?
originally posted by: xuenchen
Nice deflection.
What about this testimony under oath ?
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: xuenchen
Ok, so Obama tried to protect the Iran deal.
Can you explain why the Iran deal is bad? Furthermore, can you explain what other options the US had given world opinion towards the previous sanctions plan?
Nice deflection.
What about this testimony under oath ?
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: xuenchen
Ok, so Obama tried to protect the Iran deal.
Can you explain why the Iran deal is bad? Furthermore, can you explain what other options the US had given world opinion towards the previous sanctions plan?
Everyone is missing what Julian said. He was speaking metaphorically, that Al Jazeera itself is the nuclear weapon. Read the tweet again. You missed it the first time...
(who Julian Assange just said also have a nuclear bomb)
originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: WhateverYouSay
Everyone is missing what Julian said. He was speaking metaphorically, that Al Jazeera itself is the nuclear weapon. Read the tweet again. You missed it the first time...
(who Julian Assange just said also have a nuclear bomb)
originally posted by: WhateverYouSay
WTF is with you Trumpers who have such a hard-on for Iran but totally support Assad and Russia? You do realize they're part of a nexus, correct?
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Obama's legacy will include being a terrorist sympathizer and apologist.
He was the Neville Chamberlain of the 21st Century.
originally posted by: ErrorErrorError
originally posted by: DBCowboy
Obama's legacy will include being a terrorist sympathizer and apologist.
He was the Neville Chamberlain of the 21st Century.
:p Your current prez just sold weapons to the #1 terrorist country in the world,
but Obama is a terrorist sympathizer and apologist for making a deal with Iran, Iran the country that is fighting #1 terrorist threat to world peace ?
American logic