a reply to: heavymental
Why would a person who is not a Muslim but pro-Sharia be ''retarded?"
I am thinking you don't mean to say that from the tone of the rest of your message but it looks like you are saying that.
But being pro-Sharia doesn't mean anything other than you support Muslims right to practice their religion, as it's analogous to Halakhic law which IS
actually partially US law, specifically the 7 Noahide laws (because only Jews are good enough for all 10 commandments), as of 1992.
Are anti-Halakhic Jews treated equally in Israel? Nope.
They are forced to pledge loyalty to it in order to return under the return law even if they don't believe in the Talmud whatsoever.
Most Muslim majority nations aren't even governed by Sharia. Only the ones that are bedfellows with the US and agree to do everything possible to make
it seem barbaric are allowed to, S.A., Iran, Pakistan I imagine.
Turkey is governed by Donmeh-Sabbateans who pretended to convert to Islam in the 17th century and have done everything possible to destroy it since,
Secular and not Sharia governed at all.
But things were SO much better before Colonial oppression and under Sharia than they are today so I would say a lot of lies about it and propaganda
against it have been effective at getting people to forget that the Christian Europeans have a history of savagery unrivaled in all of history
including a bicoastal genocide of the Native Americans to almost extinction, the 1492 Colon(Cristo-baal Colon was Coloumbus real name)ization that
began with the religio-ethnic cleansing of Spain in Europe and continues to morph and pass from Empire to Empire under the guise of spreading
democracy. Forcefully converted more than half of a hemisphere to Catholicism, including S. Americans who some of which vanished "mysteriously"
(obviously genocide), Europeans have been guilty of the MOST barbaric acts for 2,000 years just like the ones mentioned now.
The massacre of Jerusalem that is famous for being boasted about by the criminals who did it who reported the blood was ankle deep to a camel or a
horse, where Muslims and Jews and Asian Christians were wholesale slaughtered in imitation of Joshua pbuh and Canaan, although they ACTUALLY DID kill
every inhabitant, down to children.
So yeah... Ask the Native Americans surviving today what's scarier, whitey or Sharia.
"There is no compulsion of any sort in matters of religion for the right way stands clearly distinguished from the way of error."
Sharia is based on the Qur'an, forced conversion illegal and can't be made an accusation against Islam as it was a diverse Ummah of different
religions and Europe had ONE that was LEGALLY THE ONLY RELIGION ALLOWED in Europe and at no point in its history did it not kill people for refusing
to convert or persecute out of existence for being even an Arian Christian that denied the Trinity of Nicea.
Killing men of science were standard operating procedure.
Until the science of the Muslims was learned and the philosophy of the Greeks preserver BY ISLAM and translated into Latin FROM ARABIC that also
influenced Islamic law, Aristotle especially, Europe lived in a permanent Dark Age.
Back to the Native American:
If he doesn't own a Casino and irrationally think it could possibly replace the Constitution, in which case I don't think he'd be a casino owner if
thst stupid but regardless my point is (I know not all N.A.'s are casino owners it was funny because gambling and interest charging are 2 things that
would be illegal under Sharia, not Sabbatean Arabia's rewrite of it but REAL Sharia, although I also know they are not bankers but it is a worthy law
to mention and would be the greatest single change to US law that could be made IN US CONGRESS, but will never happen)....
He is going to tell you that the white man is far more dangerous with his laws, courts and military might to ever be vulnerable to replacement of
their US Constitution with Sharia and that propaganda against it's a diseased blanket... accept it and you WILL be sick.
Hate being the particular illness.
One of the symptoms is insulting people who are clearly more in touch with reality than they are whenever logic doesn't support their misguided
biggotry they don't understand even is biggotry.
I don't mean you but I did briefly notice that a few people decided to send comments questioning my intelligence and I am capable of displaying how
mistaken they are so I am going to do just that.
Pretty much did. All that's left is more insults but nothing I have said have or would I say without knowing for certain is true, unless I was joking
like about Casinos or something similar or made a minor error I am not aware of, I can say with total confidence everything I said is true.
I recommend it to anyone and everyone that they only say what they know as fact and only if you are capable of determining fact from fantasy should
Clearly not everyone is but other than that mysterious comment I think might be you manually quoting someone I would not say that about you from your
comment, the only 1 I've read but still you seem level headed, a rarity today, I respect you for that at least, it's all I know about you so all I can
edit on 12-6-2017 by Disturbinatti because: (no reason given)