It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: Grambler
The problems arise when the particular investigation involves people close to the person that calls for an end to the investigation. That smells of corruption.
Even you can admit that. It's a basic premise.
Yes, like I said, a political request. Not a potential illegal request.
What is arbitrary about what I said? Lynch made a political request, Trump potentially made a request that was corrupt and unethical considering the circumstances.
No. He was correct in his assessment. There was no legal precedence to recommend charges at that time. As is the case with many investigations, info can become available long after the trail goes cold, look at missing person/mysterious death cases years after they have been set aside for an example.
Yes, more evidence was presented and he did the right thing by informing the committees. His conclusion remained the same and there is absolutely no reason to suggest he swept anything under the rug.
That's pure conspiracy on your part.
It's not problematic. You seem to be misunderstanding the difference between the two cases.
That is not my problem or burden to bear. I cannot hold you, or others, hand through all this.
He never said anything about "the investigation was over because he was concerned she would look bad". That is pure speculation on your part.
COMEY: Yes, sir. I ask — after President Clinton, former President Clinton met on the plane with the attorney general, I considered whether I should call for the appointment of a special counsel. And decided that would be an unfair thing to do because I knew there was no case there. We investigated it very, very thoroughly. I know this is a subject of passionate disagreement but I knew there was no case there. And calling for the appointment of special counsel would be brutally unfair because it would send the message, uh-huh, there's something here. That's my judgment. Lots of people have different views about it but that's what I thought about it.
Again, there may have been talk of Comey leaking the memos before he actually did it.
We need a lot more context to this before we go too far.
Not my concern about what you think when you fail to present anything that could be considered impartial, reasonable commentary.
That's no reason to make an assumption that Trump collided with anyone.
Then there is no crime. It is not 'illegal' for foreign governments to want to influence an election... it is not 'illegal' for them to do anything. Illegality indicates subservience to the law, and foreign governments are not subject to US law.
No, it would not. Comey has no power to investigate Trump. The fact he gave his memos to Mueller means only that he gave his memos to Mueller... nothing more. If Mueller says Trump is under investigation, then we can say Trump is under investigation. Mueller has not said that, and the NSA, DoJ, DHS, CIA, and FBI have all stated he is not and has not been under investigation.
Donald Trump is not under investigation and has not been under investigation before Comey was fired. There is no indication Donald Trump is under investigation now.
Donald Trump never demanded Comey stop any investigation.
Comey told Donald Trump he was not under investigation, but refused to admit that publicly.
Comey intentionally leaked his memos to the press via an anonymous source.
Comey's concern over Trump's statement was based on personal feelings towards Trump.
Loretta Lynch issued an order that also caused Comey discomfort, but he took no action and acquiesced.
No investigation was halted or delayed by Donald Trump.
True. He did not demand. He said he hoped it would go away. I'll leave it to the legal experts to decide what it all means.
What are legal experts going to do?
I didn't make any such assumption and I am not responsible for such a claim.
Again, I did not make any such claim. Please try to stick to what I've said.
True. He did not demand. He said he hoped it would go away. I'll leave it to the legal experts to decide what it all means.
Ok. So?
His personal, unclassified memos as a private citizen. He addressed that issue.
His personal interpretation of Trump's words and actions. He didn't just make things up. Trump said and did very specific things that Comey is not responsible for.
She did not issue and order. She made a request about the term he used. That request is not comparable to what Trump requested, but still worthy of discussion.
That doesn't matter, actually. For example, you don't have to be successful in obstructing justice for one to be guilty of trying.
Then why even debate it? If there was no investigation, no crime, then what is the point of debating them?
Fair enough. I hope legal precedence is followed, wherein stating one 'hopes' something is not the same as ordering something.
So, Comey demonstrated political bias in performing his duties. That's OK with you?
Comey does not have the power to classify or declassify documents. The memos were taken in performance of his duties, concerning an official meeting, using a classified FBI laptop. No, sir, they were not his personal anything.
Lynch certainly issued a direct order. Comey already admitted that, and that following it made him "uncomfortable." You're right the two instances are not comparable... Lynch was absolutely in the wrong.
Where is the evidence Trump even tried? Hoping that an acquaintance is not further punished? Again, Trump had every right as President to demand the investigation be stopped or to pardon Flynn and render the investigation moot. He did neither.
originally posted by: TheRedneck
a reply to: introvert
Comey opened a huge can of worms yesterday and this is not over by a long shot.
Agreed. The swamp is full of muck and mire; it could take a very long time to drain and even longer to flush clean.
TheRedneck
originally posted by: allsee4eye
a reply to: UKTruth
The Trump tweet was on May 12. When was the leak? Anyone know?