It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Huffington Post
In 1996, when serving as Alabama’s attorney general, he promoted H.B. 242, S.B. 291, a state bill to establish mandatory death sentences for a second drug trafficking conviction, including for dealing marijuana.
…
1987, the Supreme Court had completely banned mandatory death sentences.
originally posted by: Deny Arrogance
originally posted by: knowledgehunter0986
a reply to: underwerks
As a Trump defender, I don't agree with his stance on weed.
See it's not hard
It's about to be legal here in Toronto.
Which is great because I'm a regular.
This is Trump's stated stance.
TRUE: During campaign, Trump pledged to leave marijuana legalization up to states
www.politifact.com...
Which part do you disagree with?
originally posted by: underwerks
That's the thing that gets me though, all these politicians like Sessions are being paid very well by lobbyists from multiple industries to keep cannabis illegal.
Will they forego their own money for the federal government to rake in a little more?
I don't see that happening.
originally posted by: Devino
a reply to: underwerks
Huffington Post
In 1996, when serving as Alabama’s attorney general, he promoted H.B. 242, S.B. 291, a state bill to establish mandatory death sentences for a second drug trafficking conviction, including for dealing marijuana.
…
1987, the Supreme Court had completely banned mandatory death sentences.
That’s some F# up S# right there, mandatory death penalty for selling weed?!?! It appears constitutional law is not Mr. Session’s strong point. I could never understand why some people absolutely hate cannabis, but death penalties for pot dealers? Wow!
I think this, much like Session's "mandatory death penalty", would also be considered unconstitutional.
originally posted by: thesaneone
a reply to: underwerks
I think you know what I was talking about, worst case scenario is the don't give them federal funding, with the taxes the states collect from MJ sales, I don't think they would care.
Enforcement would be up to the DEA in this case.
In our federalist system, federal and state governments possess their own spheres of power. Consequently, in cases such as New York v. United States and Printz v. United States, the Supreme Court has made clear that states cannot be conscripted to carry out federal law. If the federal government wants to enforce federal immigration law, it must do so itself.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
I would keep an eye on it, but it looks like his stance has always been leave it to the states.
It was however used extensively to manipulate the millennials into voting against Trump by the liberal media.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: underwerks
Yea I thought of pretty much that exact same scenario right after I hit reply on my comment.
Which sets up an interesting scenario: Trump said more than once that weed was a state issue, and that enforcement would not be a priority of his administration. Sessions' doesn't appear to be willing to toe the line on that issue. So does Trump go back on what he said, or does he get rid of Sessions already?
And that's not even getting into Trump's support of medical weed and Sessions' likening it to heroin.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Mandroid7
I would keep an eye on it, but it looks like his stance has always been leave it to the states.
It was however used extensively to manipulate the millennials into voting against Trump by the liberal media.
With Jeff Session's as AG, it looks like they were correct about who to vote against.
originally posted by: Mandroid7
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Mandroid7
I would keep an eye on it, but it looks like his stance has always been leave it to the states.
It was however used extensively to manipulate the millennials into voting against Trump by the liberal media.
With Jeff Session's as AG, it looks like they were correct about who to vote against.
That is a ridiculous comment.
Hillary is about as liberal as a pitbull on meth.
Nothing the "liberals" do has anything to do with liberation, it is quite to opposite.
Try and remove yourself from your "team" for once and think objectively.
The Clintons have a know record of causing damage to superpredators and filling prisons with their legislation.
A person outside, or appearing to, will always be a better choice, especially if they know how to do the math and balance a budget.
Anyone who has Sessions opinion needs to be removed from power immediately.
originally posted by: underwerks
With Jeff Session's as AG, it looks like they were correct about who to vote against.
originally posted by: Blue Shift
originally posted by: underwerks
With Jeff Session's as AG, it looks like they were correct about who to vote against.
Let's see if he's still around by the end of next month.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Mandroid7
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Mandroid7
I would keep an eye on it, but it looks like his stance has always been leave it to the states.
It was however used extensively to manipulate the millennials into voting against Trump by the liberal media.
With Jeff Session's as AG, it looks like they were correct about who to vote against.
That is a ridiculous comment.
Hillary is about as liberal as a pitbull on meth.
Nothing the "liberals" do has anything to do with liberation, it is quite to opposite.
Try and remove yourself from your "team" for once and think objectively.
The Clintons have a know record of causing damage to superpredators and filling prisons with their legislation.
A person outside, or appearing to, will always be a better choice, especially if they know how to do the math and balance a budget.
Anyone who has Sessions opinion needs to be removed from power immediately.
Ridiculous, how so? Was Jeff Sessions not nominated by Donald Trump?
I don't remember any liberals nominating him for AG..
Trump did say he's only getting the "best" people, right? So obviously that includes Sessions, seeing as how Trump personally nominated him..