It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

relevant facts that Obama needs to realize.

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 7 2017 @ 10:17 AM
link   


This video is about Obama chastising Trump for suggesting our vote could be manipulated.

Now the underlying point is Trump was right according to the new documents released by Winning.
But in light of this:
www.dailymail.co.uk...

Former U.S. president Barack Obama delivered an extended, vicious coded critique of his successor Donald Trump on Tuesday in Canada, speaking to an audience of 6,000 fans at an event hosted by the Montreal Board of Trade. He bashed the rise of 'extreme nationalism and xenophobia and the politics of "us-versus-them",' a clear slap at Trump in the preferred language of American liberals. 'In times of disruption we may go backward instead of forward,' he warned. 'We're going to have to replace fear with hope.' Obama drew laughter with a thinly veiled kick at the Trump administration's famous embrace of 'alternative facts,' saying that America in the less than 20 weeks since he left office has suddenly devolved into a place 'where we don't just have disagreements based on our opinions, but now people are just disagreeing on facts.' 'And we're in an environment where we are only accepting information that fits our opinions, instead of basing our opinions on the facts that we receive. And evidence and reason and logic. Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



Which is in stark contrast to Obama's own words to the American people.

OBAMA: And if he got the most votes, then it would be my expectation of Hillary Clinton to offer a gracious concession speech and pledge to work with him in order to make sure that the American people benefit from an effective government. And it would be my job to welcome Mr. Trump, regardless of what he's said about me or my differences with him on my opinions, and escort him over to the Capitol, in which there would be a peaceful transfer of power. That's what Americans do. That's why America is already great. One way of weakening America, making it less great, is if you start betraying those basic American traditions that have been bipartisan, and have helped to hold together this democracy now for well over two centuries.


If you want to whine about Obama not being relevant since he's no longer president, I direct you to the news article mentioned in the OP. I didn't write it, and I sure as hell didn't ask Obama to do exactly what he told the world he wouldn't do. He would be the one with ZERO integrity, and rightfully the one who deserves shame and copious ridicule.




posted on Jun, 7 2017 @ 10:32 AM
link   
a reply to: network dude

Obama is still toeing the line for globalists. The guy is a total fraud and hypocrite. F*** you Barry.



posted on Jun, 7 2017 @ 10:38 AM
link   
a reply to: FamCore

I am throwing up a little as I write this, but Hillary has more integrity than this clown. At least she has been consistent in her hate.



posted on Jun, 7 2017 @ 10:43 AM
link   

He bashed the rise of 'extreme nationalism and xenophobia and the politics of "us-versus-them",' a clear slap at Trump in the preferred language of American liberals.


What, now talking about "us-versus-them" is a sign of being against "us-versus-them", which is bad (because it is talking-like-liberals)?

That does not make any sense. This is so inverted and in-itself turned-in-and-out kind of unlogic that it hurts. Doesn't it? If not, explain to me why speaking against "us-versus-them" is a bad thing.

Is "us-versus-them" really a good thing? Is this pickering and nutcasing of "divide et impera" really what you want? Because it directs all the needed energies to rebuilt a country against its people. Winning nothing, losing everything, because the energy is LOST.



posted on Jun, 7 2017 @ 10:50 AM
link   
Obama needs to be impeached. Sooner rather than later. Now!



posted on Jun, 7 2017 @ 10:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12
Obama needs to be impeached. Sooner rather than later. Now!


day late and a dollar short. What he needs to do is listen to what he said, reflect on that, and go hide in the woods until his days are up. Go home Barry, you're drunk.



posted on Jun, 7 2017 @ 10:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: ManFromEurope

He bashed the rise of 'extreme nationalism and xenophobia and the politics of "us-versus-them",' a clear slap at Trump in the preferred language of American liberals.


What, now talking about "us-versus-them" is a sign of being against "us-versus-them", which is bad (because it is talking-like-liberals)?

That does not make any sense. This is so inverted and in-itself turned-in-and-out kind of unlogic that it hurts. Doesn't it? If not, explain to me why speaking against "us-versus-them" is a bad thing.

Is "us-versus-them" really a good thing? Is this pickering and nutcasing of "divide et impera" really what you want? Because it directs all the needed energies to rebuilt a country against its people. Winning nothing, losing everything, because the energy is LOST.


I would never attempt to educate someone from the UK on what the U stands for, but here in the Usa, the U is supposed to be UNITED. Sadly, if Trump, who was duly elected by the system put in place by our forefathers, is president, that part is optional.



posted on Jun, 7 2017 @ 11:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: ManFromEurope

He bashed the rise of 'extreme nationalism and xenophobia and the politics of "us-versus-them",' a clear slap at Trump in the preferred language of American liberals.


What, now talking about "us-versus-them" is a sign of being against "us-versus-them", which is bad (because it is talking-like-liberals)?

That does not make any sense. This is so inverted and in-itself turned-in-and-out kind of unlogic that it hurts. Doesn't it? If not, explain to me why speaking against "us-versus-them" is a bad thing.

Is "us-versus-them" really a good thing? Is this pickering and nutcasing of "divide et impera" really what you want? Because it directs all the needed energies to rebuilt a country against its people. Winning nothing, losing everything, because the energy is LOST.


It's never really been "us vs. them". That's just something they would like you to believe. Its really about using the money that we give to our government representatives towards helping all of us who contribute to the pot. When people start complaining that our hard earned tax contributions (which again we give to support OUR infrastructure, security, social security, etc.) are being sent out of the country and also used to support a flood of people who sneak into the country illegally, all of a sudden its xenophobia. It is NOT. Most people on the right support immigration, just not uncontrolled open-border immigration which drains our tax revenue.



new topics

top topics



 
6

log in

join