It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Sumarian writing from the Pyramid at Choka, South America.

page: 2
13
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 6 2017 @ 11:20 AM
link   
a reply to: seasonal

... "hand bags" and "white bearded men" ...

Yes, very interesting indeed... I wonder if the same folks as the Tarim mummies. Red headed, very tall, with genetic traces in ireland, ukraine, siberia. Like the last inhabitants of the previous age, hanging on, maintaining power in subtle ways.




posted on Jun, 6 2017 @ 11:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: anonentity
What can you say when the same stonework is found all around the ancient world, when the same T clamps are used all around the world from Vietnam to Egypt, and to Bolivia. You would have to say the same ancient civilisation had a worldwide connection. Theirs a Pyramid at Choka in Bolivia, that the government is allowing the locals to mine, and one of the Artifacts in the La Paz museum, was from this site and was used as a pig trough for a few years until the ancient Sumerian script was found on its inside.
This Vid has great shots of all the artifacts, the cone heads and the advanced civilisation which ended. Even the original Chinese pictograms are found on Maya artifacts. With what we see here the time line of the present historical model need upgrading, and more importantly what caused its demise. vwww.youtube.com...


It's difficult to assess a video, since it's time-consuming to stop the thing, rewrite the point they're making, do a screen cap of the photo, etc, etc.

HOWEVER... a couple of points:

* The Fuente Magna bowl was made over 2,000 years after cuneiform died out and translating it as cuneiform (Sumerian) doesn't work.

* "Cone heads" are usually shown from multiple cultures and fairly recent times (not 6,000 years old or older.) Head binding was practiced in some areas (done to distinguish upper class from ordinary folks) but was not done in Europe/Asia. It was done in some parts of Africa, but not in Egypt.

* "T-clamps", as others have pointed out, is a simple and obvious solution. Just like "weaving plant fibers into cloth" which was done all around the world.

* Chinese pictograms found on Maya artifacts - sounds like someone didn't bother to look up history. The ancient Chinese had been dead (and the pictograms unusued) for thousands of years... the Maya developed their own script.



posted on Jun, 6 2017 @ 11:50 AM
link   

originally posted by: 3n19m470
Right. Multiple cultures developed Sumerian cuneiform text because it just happened to be a simple solution to a problem faced around the world. Pyramidal structures, megalithic constructions, nails, and sumerian cuneiform script... All obvious solutions.
Yep, makes perfect sense... Totally.


You'll have to show that they developed Cuneiform script (with more than one questionable example) and that it took place around the time the cuneiform script developed into writing.

Second, you have to show that all the pyramids are the same. Not the same outside shape (which by the way is not true... they have different shapes and different slopes) but the same interior structure.

Third, you have to show that the megalithic constructions are similar. Not just "people moved big rocks to make something" but what they made is exactly the same as they made elsewhere.



posted on Jun, 6 2017 @ 01:50 PM
link   


Whites could solve all their own mysteries if they stopped putting themselves in other people's position.
a reply to: BigBangWasAnEcho

what?



posted on Jun, 6 2017 @ 05:44 PM
link   
a reply to: luthier


I agree, the present Dairy heard has been manipulated to give five times more milk in a day than a normal Cow left to its own devices. Sheep are actually goats which have been bred for wool and meat, they don't look anything like their wild counterparts. The same could be done with humans. Why are females smaller than males on average? why is childbirth so dangerous, it would be reasonable to suggest the females were the survivors of people whos males were killed off in battle by a larger breed, which meant the baby might be too large. It would be interesting if this bears out with the genetics. Because their are some seals with this problem as well.



posted on Jun, 7 2017 @ 09:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: luthier
Why are females smaller than males on average?

We're not that much different as to count as sexual dimorphism. Some women are larger than some men. In a sexually dimorphed species, one sex never ever attains the size of the other sex (no matter how big or how puny.)


why is childbirth so dangerous, it would be reasonable to suggest the females were the survivors of people whos males were killed off in battle by a larger breed, which meant the baby might be too large.


Because we're not marsupials and because we have a history of assisting women with difficult childbirth and because we're better nourished. If you put us on hunter-gatherer rations and refused to help women with childbirth (most like me would die off) then you'd have the "smaller babies."



posted on Jun, 8 2017 @ 11:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Byrd

All true. But humans have the issue of the brain vs body and the hips....the reason is the cranium.







 
13
<< 1   >>

log in

join