It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Blackfinger
Yeh that how they did the small ones, the big ones would just crush the sledge.
My thought too. How could the ancients, with their primitive tools compared to today, have constructed a sledge that would hold 3,000 tons, when to transport a 340 ton boulder back in 2012 they had to use a custom-built 176-wheel transporter for the job.
-MM
No ancient structures contain a stone anywhere near 3,000 tons so the question is beside the point.
800 tons isn't too much for a sledge if the runners are a foot or two square in cross-section, depending of course on the type of wood used (balsa won't work nor will palm trees, for example.)
If it had been acceptable to drag your boulder down the highway, no custom-built transporter would have been required.
Harte
So, according to your logic, the engineers that moved the 340 ton boulder in 2012 obviously should have used a sled? And that a sled would have been cheaper and better than the 176-wheel transporter they had made for the hauling? If so, then you should give them a call, as they'll obviously hire you as a consultant for their next megalithic hauling job ...
-MM
Your straw man argument here is utterly transparent.
Do you believe a transport company can destroy an asphalt highway without repercussions?
In the future, perhaps you might respond to what I actually wrote, instead of whatever you would have preferred that I wrote.
Harte
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Harte
Your straw man argument here is utterly transparent.
Do you believe a transport company can destroy an asphalt highway without repercussions?
In the future, perhaps you might respond to what I actually wrote, instead of whatever you would have preferred that I wrote.
Harte
That is my point; they did not even have asphalt roads back then, and do you claim that a 1,000 ton sled would not dig into the soil or push any stones in a paved road away? It just dosn't add up.
prefer
-MM
originally posted by: Josephus
a reply to: bloodymarvelous
Anti Gravity reminds me of Coral Castle in Florida. Supposedly built single-handedly Two supposed witnesses of its construction said they saw the stones "floating like hydrogen balloons".
originally posted by: carewemust
Dumb question. Could GRAVITY have been LESS back then? We now know that the only constant in the universe is "change". Right?
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Harte
Your straw man argument here is utterly transparent.
Do you believe a transport company can destroy an asphalt highway without repercussions?
In the future, perhaps you might respond to what I actually wrote, instead of whatever you would have preferred that I wrote.
Harte
That is my point; they did not even have asphalt roads back then, and do you claim that a 1,000 ton sled would not dig into the soil or push any stones in a paved road away? It just dosn't add up.
prefer
-MM
It adds up perfectly well, unless you prefer that it didn't, which appears to be the case here.
There's quite a difference between a permanent road meant for anyone to use and a road specifically built to move megaliths over.
Just one small example - asphalt trucks don't line the shoulders of highways, repairing the road after each vehicle passes.
Harte
originally posted by: Tempter
Advanced technology, yet they still used giant stones.
Hrmmm....
originally posted by: rottensociety
There is the view that humanity moves in a cycle: where we develop language and communities, become civilised, start fighting over territory then ultimately use weapons that wipe out everything we've ever done which plunges us into an Ice Age that turns civilised humans back into animals just fighting for survival.
The Greeks called the cycle of humanity the "Great Year".
This would explain all the advanced objects we find today. They are left over from previous civilisations such as ours.
and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Harte
Your straw man argument here is utterly transparent.
Do you believe a transport company can destroy an asphalt highway without repercussions?
In the future, perhaps you might respond to what I actually wrote, instead of whatever you would have preferred that I wrote.
Harte
That is my point; they did not even have asphalt roads back then, and do you claim that a 1,000 ton sled would not dig into the soil or push any stones in a paved road away? It just dosn't add up.
prefer
-MM
It adds up perfectly well, unless you prefer that it didn't, which appears to be the case here.
There's quite a difference between a permanent road meant for anyone to use and a road specifically built to move megaliths over.
Just one small example - asphalt trucks don't line the shoulders of highways, repairing the road after each vehicle passes.
Harte
Then just how do you explain the ancients lifting these 1,000 ton++ blocks upwards and placing them in walls etc?
-MM
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Tempter
Advanced technology, yet they still used giant stones.
Hrmmm....
The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics dictates that even a solid block of gold (which is one of the least reactive elements) would disintegrate/become gold dust given enough time.
So, these places may be so old that everything has "rotted" away except the stones.
-MM
originally posted by: anonentity
a reply to: Tempter
They built to last.It makes logical sense to make a building out of the stuff that's around where you want to build.You need a water source, if their are no stones around you use what's available.If you weave a frame out of saplings and then push clay into it, you have a house that doesn't cost a fortune.Or push the clay into a weaved structure then light a fire inside and voila you have a ceramic house.