It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Refuge status offered to Trump haters

page: 6
43
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 04:08 PM
link   

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuckDepends whose math matches up matches up with your ideology?

I don't have an ideology, other than don't waste money for no reason.




posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 04:09 PM
link   
a reply to: kaylaluv

I care less about opinions based on the data and more on the actual data. They can think wasting 100 trillion for .0000001 degree difference is worth it, I don't, do you?



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 04:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: JohnnyCanuck

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck


Much the same way that Canadian scientists offered to store climate-change research as it was disappearing from American government websites.
Never happened, progressive lies. Smear campaign against Trump was all that was.

I guess first person accounts don't matter in the Trumpiverse: I am an Arctic researcher. Donald Trump is deleting my citations
But nice try...have a cheeto.
Nice try, more BS from the Guardian. The Guardian is the main offender perpetuating climate change myths.

There has been NO data deleted, it's just stupid progressives that never actually look at any real data and instead rely upon rags like The Guardian to propagandize their tiny brains. I look at the data, on a regular basis. Nothing has changed.

Link
How about you contact her, tell her she is lying, then get back to us, m'kay?
The Arctic Institute

It's already been proved she is lying .. in fact .. she admits she is lying, she says the data is there just takes more time to find iirc.



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 04:11 PM
link   

originally posted by: spacedoubt
a reply to: kaylaluv

He doesn't just know words. He invents them!

He makes Shakespeare look like amateur hour.



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 04:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: D8Tee

So you're promoting flat out censorship on the basis of a pretty weak Newspeak blogger and a bunch of baseless accusations? That's quite the rich tapestry by now, thanks but no.

Care to actually add something tangible?

I think you have a comprehension problem.

The people charged with getting data should be doing data, not politically biased opinion with no regard for data. In fact, it could be argued YOU are arguing for censorship.



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 04:20 PM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion


Just answer this one question honestly and I might stop mocking you for a second: how stupid do you think we are?
No smart enough to figure out the data deletion story is fake news.

Stupid enough to fall for the lies of AGW.

1. The sea level rise shows no acceleration.
2. There has been no statistically significant warming in 18 years unless you cherry pick the el nino year.
3. There has been no increase in Hurricanes or Cyclones.

4. Stupid enough to try to argue with the above.



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 04:31 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Scott and Shackleton logbooks prove Antarctic sea ice is not shrinking 100 years after expeditions

www.telegraph.co.uk...
edit on 4-6-2017 by OccamsRazor04 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 04:38 PM
link   
a reply to: JohnnyCanuck




How about you contact her, tell her she is lying, then get back to us, m'kay?
How about I just once again do a poor uninformed lefties homework for them ok? Hows that. That biatch is lying and you fell for it. You picked up on the story because you wanted it to be true. You don't care if it is true or not, just anything that can hurt this administration and suit your purposes. You are poor misguided souls who care not for truth or justice but just that your side is on top and gets it's own way ,good or bad, true or false, by ways of lies and deceit if need be.

And one more time JohnyCancuk, how much would have Kyoto cost your country????

I wish you guys would hurry up and build that spaceship so you can go colonize Mars, the real pollution is the lefties and their lies.

Here's the real story on that biatches lies, doubt a lib will read it, it's over their three second attention span, well here, let me give you the headline:

ANOTHER LYING LIBERAL


The one specific example given is this …

At first, the distress flare of lost data came as a surge of defunct links on 21 January. The US National Strategy for the Arctic, the Implementation Plan for the Strategy, and the report on our progress all gone within a matter of minutes.

That sounds important, so what exactly was that, what did it contain, and where was it hosted?

It was a document created by the previous administration and had been hosted on the official Whitehouse website.

Google that document and you can quickly find it, for example in the whitehousearchives here, or on the Virginia.edu website here, etc…. It is all over the place, so actually obliterating the very existence of this is quite frankly not an option.

It was also of course hosted on whitehouse.gov, and yes that has been purged.

But wait a second, everything Obama related, and that includes all references to climate change have been purged from this official Whitehouse website. That however is normal. In reality it would be quite frankly bizarre for a successive administration to continue to host the policy documents from the previous administration, so that observation that it is gone is not a purge of scientific data.

Incoming administrations tend to wipe that slate clean and start afresh on that website. Everything that was there is not actually obliterated, but instead has been archived and will never ever be obliterated. This is standard practise during administration transitions. Finding that archive is not exactly rocket science.

To be blunt, having links to any document hosted on whitehouse.gov and not anticipating that those links will break during an administration transition is quite frankly naive.

source

edit on 4-6-2017 by D8Tee because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 04:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
a reply to: kaylaluv

Brilliant... All the cucks and feminazis can live in the utter sh** hole that is now France.. led by the one cuck to rule them all.






posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 04:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: PublicOpinion


Just answer this one question honestly and I might stop mocking you for a second: how stupid do you think we are?
No smart enough to figure out the data deletion story is fake news.

Stupid enough to fall for the lies of AGW.

1. The sea level rise shows no acceleration.
2. There has been no statistically significant warming in 18 years unless you cherry pick the el nino year.
3. There has been no increase in Hurricanes or Cyclones.

4. Stupid enough to try to argue with the above.


You're welcome!

Look, it's pretty easy: scientists can figure this out on their own, that's what science is actually about as well. Nobody needs censorship, get it?
Just have your greasy fingers grabbing other stuff, please? I dunno... dickpics maybe?



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Politically biased opinion? Care to show me how exactly that came across? I'm having a hard time looking that up now, any backups?


edit on 4-6-2017 by PublicOpinion because: (no reason given)

edit on 4-6-2017 by PublicOpinion because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 04:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: PublicOpinion

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: PublicOpinion


Just answer this one question honestly and I might stop mocking you for a second: how stupid do you think we are?
No smart enough to figure out the data deletion story is fake news.

Stupid enough to fall for the lies of AGW.

1. The sea level rise shows no acceleration.
2. There has been no statistically significant warming in 18 years unless you cherry pick the el nino year.
3. There has been no increase in Hurricanes or Cyclones.

4. Stupid enough to try to argue with the above.


You're welcome!

Look, it's pretty easy: scientists can figure this out on their own, that's what science is actually about as well. Nobody needs censorship, get it?
Just have your greasy fingers grabbing other stuff, please? I dunno... dickpics maybe?

If you are about science why are you up in arms about someone saying they should stick to science and not politics? Seems odd.



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 04:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Politically biased opinion? Care to show me how exactly that came across? I'm having a hard time to look that up myself now, any backups?


Feel free to look at the "scientist" being "censored" that is already sourced in this very thread as being a proven liar and all the data still exists.

Science data .. still there. Politically biased opinions, gone. Why aren't you happy about that, I thought you were about science?



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 05:01 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

What's odd with mocking politicians for their meddlings with science? Let the scientists work it out themselves, data even tends to speak for itself at times.

No! Yes. Duh!



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion

When did I ever say I wanted censorship?

I want the scientists to stick to science and NOAA and NASA to report the data, not politicize. Do you disagree with this approach? As for the data being deleted, i've proven that false. Do you guys even care about whats true and whats not true? It took two minutes to fact check that claim, you guys could have done it, but you WANTED it to be true. You NEEDED it to be true to further you agenda, thus by accepting the lie, you are both liars by association. It's story was even on ATS and was debunked months ago.
edit on 4-6-2017 by D8Tee because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: OccamsRazor04




Why aren't you happy about that, I thought you were about science?


Maybe I would be happy if you could present us with some evidence?



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 05:05 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee




I want the scientists to stick to science and NOAA and NASA to report the data, not politicize.


Maybe you care to explain how and why they did that?



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 05:11 PM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion




Maybe you care to explain how and why they did that?


NOAA Article on Sea Level Rise

Pseudoscience and a distortion of reality. The purpose of that page is to indoctrinate people into thinking the seas are rising faster now than they have been in the last 160 years. That is utter bull#, it's a politicization of the data and a misrepresentation of real science. It's the same with many NASA and NOAA frontpages, nothing more than propaganda. If you want to debate sea level rise, feel free, I can prove to you it is rising no more now than in the past. Difference being I won't distort any data and have peer reviewed papers and NOAA data that supports my assertation.


edit on 4-6-2017 by D8Tee because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 05:27 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

And how exactly do you indoctrinate people with an article on a highly specialised site for nerds? You hold a gun to peoples heads and tell 'em where to find the propaganda, which they somehow wont find on FOX in the evening news?

How about having scientists debate their findings with others, if there are any? Actually, that's how the job was done until the Spanish Inquisition arrived to save catholicism from the bastard heretics...

Yeah. Up in flames we go again!
edit on 4-6-2017 by PublicOpinion because: (no reason given)

edit on 4-6-2017 by PublicOpinion because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 4 2017 @ 05:39 PM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion


And how exactly do you indoctrinate people with an article on a highly specialised site for nerds?
It's the number one hit for 'sea level rise'.

You think thats a highly specialized site? geeesh.

They are worthless dumbed down information that selectively set out data propagating their agenda leading to Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt about the future, thus ensuring public support for participaction in the UNFCCC and support for Big Eared Barries regulations declaring C02 a dangerous pollutant. People similar to yourself who see the site as highly specialized and have limited technical backgrounds will read only the headlines, and be satisfied via the Appeal To Authority Fallacy that the Sea Levels are rising at an accelerated rate.

The IPPCC and the UNFCCC ain't no dummies, John Cook, the guy who came up with the 97 percent consensus paper, he aint' a climatologist, he's a Cognitive Psychologist with a PhD in that field. At some point in time you lefties might grow up and realize you've been tricked, I'm certain a majority of you has the intelligence to wake and cut through the fog.




top topics



 
43
<< 3  4  5    7  8 >>

log in

join