It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: rexsblues
The same a-holes that blamed Trump for letting classified info slip to the Russians are outting spies that we have imbedded in Iran?
Real nice.
originally posted by: CulturalResilience
I'm going to consider the N.Y. Times days numbered from this point. I don't see a way back from this for It, if this is what it has done.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: CulturalResilience
I'm going to consider the N.Y. Times days numbered from this point. I don't see a way back from this for It, if this is what it has done.
As long as they beat the Trump hammer liberals will defend them.
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: CulturalResilience
I'm going to consider the N.Y. Times days numbered from this point. I don't see a way back from this for It, if this is what it has done.
As long as they beat the Trump hammer liberals will defend them.
As long as there is a 1st amendment right to freedom of the press, we should all defend them.
The NYT did not "out" an undercover spy embedded deep in Iran, conducting secret missions. He's well-known and has even been portrayed in movies.
originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: lordcomac
But when spy's are "outed" doesn't that potentially endanger not only the life of the spy and his/her associates, but missions as well?
Then, the liberal MSM (whom we all hate), would have more news to report, increasing their stature/revenue. The USA would be less safe, and the dreaded MSM would be sitting pretty.
Wrong. They have freedom of the press until they sell out a fellow american to a enemy nation.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: yuppa
Wrong. They have freedom of the press until they sell out a fellow american to a enemy nation.
How have they sold him out to an enemy nation?
You do know that he is not in Iran conducting missions and his name has been in the public for some time, right?
originally posted by: lordcomac
Well, isn't this tricky.
On the one hand outing a spook is probably treason, and I'd love to see them shut down for good over it.
On the same hand, I really hate the CIA, and the MSM.
On the other hand, media needs to not be controlled by government (as with the Obama propaganda law change a few years back) because they need to be exposing corruption, and there's plenty to go around.
So... Do we censor a media outlet over mucking with government? I'm going to have to go with no... As much as I'd like to see them all go down
originally posted by: introvert
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: CulturalResilience
I'm going to consider the N.Y. Times days numbered from this point. I don't see a way back from this for It, if this is what it has done.
As long as they beat the Trump hammer liberals will defend them.
As long as there is a 1st amendment right to freedom of the press, we should all defend them.
The NYT did not "out" an undercover spy embedded deep in Iran, conducting secret missions. He's well-known and has even been portrayed in movies.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: UKTruth
He lives in DC and his name has been public record for 2 years as has his job with the CIA
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: UKTruth
He lives in DC and his name has been public record for 2 years as has his job with the CIA
There are lots of public figures in DC that Iran would not be focusing on - now they have a name I am sure they can target their counter intelligence quite nicely.
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
originally posted by: UKTruth
originally posted by: OtherSideOfTheCoin
a reply to: UKTruth
He lives in DC and his name has been public record for 2 years as has his job with the CIA
There are lots of public figures in DC that Iran would not be focusing on - now they have a name I am sure they can target their counter intelligence quite nicely.
They probably already knew what he does
originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: rexsblues
If true, the editors of that liberal rag should be going to jail soon.