It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: underwerks
The Trump administration was gearing up to lift sanctions on Russia when the president took office, but career diplomats ginned up pressure in Congress to block the move, two senior former State Department officials told NBC News Thursday.
It's the latest evidence that President Trump moved to turn his favorable campaign rhetoric about Russia into concrete action when he took power.
Daniel Fried, who served as a senior diplomat until he retired in late February, said he became aware of the sanctions effort in the early weeks of Trump's presidency.
Look at that, an actual named source.
The Trump team backed off, Malinowski said he believes, because officials came to see that lifting the sanctions would look terrible in light of the drumbeat of revelations over potential Trump campaign coordination with the Russian election interference effort.
"It would be politically stinky," he said.
Malinowski said he is now concerned that even if the Trump administration doesn't lift sanctions on Russia, it will stop vigilantly enforcing them. The U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control, which polices sanctions, does not have a permanent chief, and the State Department does not have a permanent sanctions coordinator.
That last part is what is interesting to me. Trump doesn't have to worry about lifting sanctions on Russia in any way as long as there isn't anyone appointed to enforce the sanctions.
What do you know...
"What was troubling about these stories is that suddenly I was hearing that we were preparing to rescind sanctions in exchange for, well, nothing," Fried said on MSNBC.
Hmmmmm....
Link
Neato.....
Sanctions were already heavily influenced with Obama and Hillary cherry picking those that the US would work with.
And of course there's that famous gaffe by Obama when the microphone caught him saying how much easier things would be once he won his second term...
So....I guess sanctions are really just a big bully negotiating piece....remember the big red button Hillary gave the Russians....it was EASY right?
Sanctions aren't just a "bully" negotiating piece. I think you're confusing political theater with actual geopolitics.
So why were some of Putin's largest companies and players that were appointed by him allowed to buy our uranium, control Joule and build a massive facility for RUSNANO in the US during this time? And why were they allowed to continue to operate to this day if these relations were so horrible and Putin was so bad?
That's under the Obama administration. Maybe he was working with Russia as well? I don't know. What I do know is how shady what Trump is doing now is. And I believe this is one of the first named sources of many to come..
explain what shady things Trump is doing now. This particular thing is not something hidden or shady based on what your article says.
To the surprise of absolutely no one, yesterday’s Crimean referendum on secession from Crimea and joining Russia resulted in a “yes” vote. What is, perhaps, somewhat striking is that the official results state that an incredible 96.7% of the voters voted yes. A 96.7% is almost never seen on anything at all controversial outside of places like North Korea – or, of course, the old Soviet Union, which Russian President Vladimir Putin served as a high-ranking KGB officer.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
originally posted by: underwerks
The Trump administration was gearing up to lift sanctions on Russia when the president took office, but career diplomats ginned up pressure in Congress to block the move, two senior former State Department officials told NBC News Thursday.
It's the latest evidence that President Trump moved to turn his favorable campaign rhetoric about Russia into concrete action when he took power.
Daniel Fried, who served as a senior diplomat until he retired in late February, said he became aware of the sanctions effort in the early weeks of Trump's presidency.
Look at that, an actual named source.
The Trump team backed off, Malinowski said he believes, because officials came to see that lifting the sanctions would look terrible in light of the drumbeat of revelations over potential Trump campaign coordination with the Russian election interference effort.
"It would be politically stinky," he said.
Malinowski said he is now concerned that even if the Trump administration doesn't lift sanctions on Russia, it will stop vigilantly enforcing them. The U.S. Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control, which polices sanctions, does not have a permanent chief, and the State Department does not have a permanent sanctions coordinator.
That last part is what is interesting to me. Trump doesn't have to worry about lifting sanctions on Russia in any way as long as there isn't anyone appointed to enforce the sanctions.
What do you know...
"What was troubling about these stories is that suddenly I was hearing that we were preparing to rescind sanctions in exchange for, well, nothing," Fried said on MSNBC.
Hmmmmm....
Link
Neato.....
Sanctions were already heavily influenced with Obama and Hillary cherry picking those that the US would work with.
And of course there's that famous gaffe by Obama when the microphone caught him saying how much easier things would be once he won his second term...
So....I guess sanctions are really just a big bully negotiating piece....remember the big red button Hillary gave the Russians....it was EASY right?
Sanctions aren't just a "bully" negotiating piece. I think you're confusing political theater with actual geopolitics.
So why were some of Putin's largest companies and players that were appointed by him allowed to buy our uranium, control Joule and build a massive facility for RUSNANO in the US during this time? And why were they allowed to continue to operate to this day if these relations were so horrible and Putin was so bad?
That's under the Obama administration. Maybe he was working with Russia as well? I don't know. What I do know is how shady what Trump is doing now is. And I believe this is one of the first named sources of many to come..
explain what shady things Trump is doing now. This particular thing is not something hidden or shady based on what your article says.
The way he carries himself, the fact that every time he opens his mouth he's either speaking pure hyperbole or straight up misrepresenting the truth to his advantage. The times this has happened are literally too many to type out here in any readable way.
I guess you could say it's the general scumminess of how he relates to the American people, who he works for. All of this combines to form my distrust of Trump.
originally posted by: underwerks
When you post a thread about the president's misdeeds with actual sources..
ATS 2017
originally posted by: underwerks
When you post a thread about the president's misdeeds with actual sources..
ATS 2017
originally posted by: underwerks
Look at that, an actual named source.
Fried declined to say who approached him, but "I found the story sufficiently credible, that I was concerned that there might actually be something done quickly."
originally posted by: JAY1980
originally posted by: underwerks
Look at that, an actual named source.
Look at that buried deep in the article...
Fried declined to say who approached him, but "I found the story sufficiently credible, that I was concerned that there might actually be something done quickly."
Not an actual named source...
*sigh*
Come on OP!
originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
a reply to: xuenchen
You are sooooo petty.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Bump and Thump Thud
Fail
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
If this info was real, he would be talking in a private and sealed atmosphere with the Special Counsel, not MSinBC.
originally posted by: underwerks
originally posted by: stosh64
a reply to: underwerks
Dropping the sanctions on Russia is a bad thing why exactly?
In one word, Crimea.