It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What if these unnamed sources are Russian secret agents?

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 1 2017 @ 06:39 AM
link   
What if these unnamed sources are Russian secret agents operating in the US? Without names, no one can know who they are and no one can investigate them. If these unnamed sources are going to NYT and WaPo instead of to Congress where whistleblowers are supposed to go, it tells you a lot how secretive these unnamed sources are. And, the more secretive they are, the more sinister they are. And, considering NYT and WaPo are so left leaning they would go out of their way to spread anti GOP stories, I wouldn't be surprised if Russian secret agents would go to them instead of to Congress if Putin wants Trump out of the WH for blocking the Syria Iraq border and obstructing his proxy army SAA in Syria. I'm not saying NYT and WaPo knowingly and deliberately take their stories from Russian secret agents, but it is possible these agents have fake American names and have infiltrated various federal positions at the low level.
edit on 1-6-2017 by allsee4eye because: (no reason given)




posted on Jun, 1 2017 @ 06:44 AM
link   
"Men in dark suits" rule the US - Putin on Deep State



Listen to the Boss himself.



posted on Jun, 1 2017 @ 06:51 AM
link   
a reply to: EartOccupant

Were you really expecting Putin to say that it was his agents down there?

He's just saying what he needs to say to create a fifth column in the US and gain people's support for his middle east policies.

It's the CPUSA all over again.



posted on Jun, 1 2017 @ 06:57 AM
link   

originally posted by: allsee4eye Without names, no one can know who they are and no one can investigate them. If these unnamed sources are going to NYT and WaPo instead of to Congress where whistleblowers are supposed to go, it tells you a lot how secretive these unnamed sources are. And, the more secretive they are, the more sinister they arel.


The "sources" could be the local DC $80 an hour psychic as well for all we know.



posted on Jun, 1 2017 @ 07:03 AM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

Here is a complete list of the foreign agents here in the US:

List of Foreign Agents in the US



posted on Jun, 1 2017 @ 07:32 AM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

The leaker(s) work for a shadow government whose objective at each election is to install an appropriate NWO muppet, sometimes Dem, sometimes Rep.

2016 marks the beginning of their end.

The evidence is all around you, you just have to open your eyes and watch and study what your elected leaders policies and motivations are.

Knowledge is power.



posted on Jun, 1 2017 @ 07:47 AM
link   
What if they're all Democrats ?




posted on Jun, 1 2017 @ 10:10 AM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

All I can say is US diplomats had better start refusing beverage offered to them-Poison is the KGBs' M.O.

Putin is the former KGB head honcho so he would know what he is doing. Turning America against itself would be his forte.


edit on 1-6-2017 by Thecakeisalie because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 1 2017 @ 10:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
What if they're all Democrats ?



Conversely they could be republicans turning against their leader-who knows? not every republican is with the prez...



posted on Jun, 1 2017 @ 10:42 AM
link   
None of these stories have any basis. No text. No photo. No video. No audio. No nothing. Gee, I wonder why these unnamed sources don't go to Congress the way whistleblowers are supposed to do by procedure. Maybe they are afraid of being caught as Russian secret agents. So that's why they go to NYT and WaPo because the media loves sensational stories even if they are fabricated and they don't investigate who their sources are.



posted on Jun, 1 2017 @ 11:49 AM
link   
a reply to: allsee4eye

And the ones who knows the truth... Plead the fifth.

How much evidence do one need?



new topics

top topics



 
5

log in

join