It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The most confusing part of the Seth Rich Conspiracy???

page: 9
10
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 31 2017 @ 05:14 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox




I thought you were joking, since the first tweet you posted said..

"Wikileaks dies not reveal its sources#SethRich.."

lol which really says it all..

You guys are dense, wikileaks has made it clear they are not about to give up their sources. Carry on with your meaningless conversation.




posted on May, 31 2017 @ 05:15 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

That is the pot calling the kettle black. A change/loophole in that policy is the conversation. You even allude to it as well. If you didn't want to discuss that then why are you here?

We already know what you keep repeating.
edit on 31-5-2017 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 05:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: D8Tee

That is the pot calling the kettle black. A change/loophole in that policy is the conversation. You even allude to it as well. If you didn't want to discuss that then why are you here?

We already know what you keep repeating.


No, you guys seem to be confused as to why wikileaks does not tell the world Seth Rich is the leaker.

It's right there before your eyes. Policy.

Simple as that.

Simple minds even should be able to figure this out, put on your critical thinking cap.

What Assange has said could not be used as proof in a court of law that Seth was the leaker.

All of your arguments are circular and invalid.

Carry on.



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 05:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee
No, you guys seem to be confused as to why wikileaks does not tell the world Seth Rich is the leaker.

We know why. We are questioning the policy.

Simple as that.



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 05:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: visitedbythem
And if Hillary is found to have a connection with Seths death, sh needs to stand trial, be convicted in a court of law, then be executed via firing squad with worldwide coverage and viewing of what we do with sick twisted murderous satanic leaders


Please read what you wrote and ask yourself: who is the sick satanic person here?


Please read what you wrote and explain why anyone would of should ask themselves anything. Seems foolish doesn't it?
Content is my sparrow
He seldom wonders why he wondered why



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 06:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: D8Tee

That is the pot calling the kettle black. A change/loophole in that policy is the conversation. You even allude to it as well. If you didn't want to discuss that then why are you here?

We already know what you keep repeating.


No, you guys seem to be confused as to why wikileaks does not tell the world Seth Rich is the leaker.

It's right there before your eyes. Policy.

Simple as that.

Simple minds even should be able to figure this out, put on your critical thinking cap.

What Assange has said could not be used as proof in a court of law that Seth was the leaker.

All of your arguments are circular and invalid.

Carry on.



Then how do we know Seth Rich's name???

Oh cause assange said that Rich was the leaker.. then he crawfished and retracted his statement... then again he said he was the leaker .. then again retracted his statement..

And now look there are oodles of conspiracies that have surfaced , specificly guessing that Rich was the leak, and that the dnc had him killed...

Exactly what assange said?!?!

How curious?!?!

What a crazy coincidence...

It almost seems exactly like assange told the whole world Seth was the leaker and was murdered for it...

Because he did...



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 06:05 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

What does it matter if they could be used in a court of law?? Isn't it way easier to find the truth then, assuming he was the leak???

Assange obviously didn't care about rich's families safety.. because if they were in danger if people found out Rich was the leaker, they would be dead by now...

He isn't doing it to show other leakers he won't reveal them...because he just revealed Rich.



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 06:15 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox




What does it matter if they could be used in a court of law??
Assange starts naming sources, alive or dead, and he will find himself in a court of law. Doubt that he wasnts anymore of that kinda trouble.



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 06:24 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Naming sources is legally worse than hosting the actual info?



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 06:30 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox


He isn't doing it to show other leakers he won't reveal them...because he just revealed Rich.


No, he dropped some crumbs to conspiracy theorists to throw them off the track. He can never reveal an actual source because then no-one would trust him with their leaks... exactly like mainstream journalists.



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: visitedbythem


Please read what you wrote and explain why anyone would of should ask themselves anything.


Question everything, especially yourself. That's what the motto over the Academy meant.



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 07:22 PM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee

Already holed up in an embassy evading court.. so that doesn't work.



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 08:01 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

So Seth was not the leak in your opinion??



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 09:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: DJW001

So Seth was not the leak in your opinion??

Nope. If he was, there were much better ways of dealing with it than random violence. Learn from the Kremlin.



posted on Jun, 1 2017 @ 12:33 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Agreed , I don't think any of the conspiracy part about Seth Rich lines up.



posted on Jun, 1 2017 @ 12:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
a reply to: DJW001

Agreed , I don't think any of the conspiracy part about Seth Rich lines up.



The shots fired lined up pretty much "on target".

So did the "coincidental" timing.





top topics



 
10
<< 6  7  8   >>

log in

join