It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The most confusing part of the Seth Rich Conspiracy???

page: 7
10
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 30 2017 @ 11:50 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

This says it best.





posted on May, 30 2017 @ 11:51 PM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

We agree that he could have.

The thing is that he could have confirmed that he was a leak and also confirmed that he was not the dnc leak.

In the end he didn't confirm anything. Not one, the other, both or neither.


edit on 30-5-2017 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 30 2017 @ 11:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: JoshuaCox

This says it best.



Except he disclosed Seth Rich , or we wouldn't be having this conversation...

Lol



posted on May, 30 2017 @ 11:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: JoshuaCox

We agree that he could have.

The thing is that he could have confirmed that he was a leak and also confirmed that he was not the dnc leak.

In the end he didn't confirm anything. Not one, the other, both or neither.



Except he did confirm it by saying it in the first place...

Super weird..

I see absolutely no functional difference between the two..

In fact it just ends up looking super wishy washy..



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 12:01 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

He didn't confirm it, he alluded to it.

When asked again he denied it.

There is a difference. Still ends up being wishy washy.



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 12:04 AM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

I like my earlier analogy...

That is like me telling your wife..

" daskakik is really risking your health because there is no telling what kinda stuff those all prostitutes have "

Then your wife replying:
" Oh my god , your telling me daskakik is banging prostitutes?!?! "


Me:
" I would never tell on my good friend daskakik !! I'm just saying you should prob get checked..."


I just told your wife you were banging prostitutes.. my little bs disclaimer doesn't change the fact your wife know knows..
edit on 31-5-2017 by JoshuaCox because: (no reason given)

edit on 31-5-2017 by JoshuaCox because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 12:08 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Democrats are wetting in their pants that is why you know it is real. I never seen them go at this length to crush anyone and harass anyone who is looking into this case. They are going bat s117 nuts. That is enough evidence for me.
edit on 31-5-2017 by amfirst1 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 12:11 AM
link   
a reply to: amfirst1

Boy it doesn't take much for you does it lol..

So like if aliens are attacking and the democrats are wetting their pants.. then come on aliens!!

If nuclear Armageddon is the making the dems wet their pants.. bring on the nukes?!?!


Lol... me thinks your scientific method might be broken...



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 12:21 AM
link   
a reply to: JoshuaCox

I liked it as well.

I get that the little bs disclaimer is what the thread is about.

Instead of a bs disclaimer he could have confirmed that he was the dnc leak, that he only leaked other stuff, that he leaked it and other stuff or that he didn't leak anything to WL.

The little bs disclaimer tries to go for the last one but then, how would Assange know?



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 12:27 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: JoshuaCox

This says it best.



Except he disclosed Seth Rich , or we wouldn't be having this conversation...

Lol
No, he did not give up anyone. That tweet appeared on the SethRich timeline, it is not the same as saying he is was the DNC leaker.



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 08:18 AM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

I don't see any functional difference between the two..

Any hitman willing to kill the family if they knew who the leaker was.. knows it was Rich..

Any source wondering about assange outing them if they are killed , now thinks he will out them if they are killed..



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 08:20 AM
link   

originally posted by: D8Tee

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: D8Tee
a reply to: JoshuaCox

This says it best.



Except he disclosed Seth Rich , or we wouldn't be having this conversation...

Lol
No, he did not give up anyone. That tweet appeared on the SethRich timeline, it is not the same as saying he is was the DNC leaker.



Everyone on the planet knew exactly what he meant..

There is no functional difference between strongly eluding to the point a toddler knows what you mean, and them confirming it ..



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 08:25 AM
link   
a reply to: D8Tee



I like my earlier analogy...

That is like me telling your wife..

" d8tee is really risking your health because there is no telling what kinda stuff all those prostitutes have "

Then your wife replying:
" Oh my god , your telling me d8tee is banging prostitutes?!?! "


Me:
" I would never tell on my good friend d8tee !! I'm just saying you should prob get checked..."


I just told your wife you were banging prostitutes.. my little bs disclaimer doesn't change the fact your wife now knows.. you are banging prostetutes..


My little bs disclaimer is not going to save our friendship or stop your brother in law from showing up to beat your @$$...
edit on 31-5-2017 by JoshuaCox because: (no reason given)

edit on 31-5-2017 by JoshuaCox because: (no reason given)

edit on 31-5-2017 by JoshuaCox because: (no reason given)

edit on 31-5-2017 by JoshuaCox because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 08:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: visitedbythem
And if Hillary is found to have a connection with Seths death, sh needs to stand trial, be convicted in a court of law, then be executed via firing squad with worldwide coverage and viewing of what we do with sick twisted murderous satanic leaders


Please read what you wrote and ask yourself: who is the sick satanic person here?



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 08:30 AM
link   
a reply to: daskakik

For sure..

I just don't see anything else that fits the variables...

If the Russians were paying him , why not confirm it was Rich??

If Rich really was the leak, why not confirm it??

It is absolutely what started it all, and the most confusing part of the tale..



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 08:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: amfirst1
a reply to: JoshuaCox

Democrats are wetting in their pants that is why you know it is real. I never seen them go at this length to crush anyone and harass anyone who is looking into this case. They are going bat s117 nuts. That is enough evidence for me.


Actually, it's the Trumpsters who are desperately trying to turn this into a distraction from the obvious. Trump is not only a Russian pawn, he is mentally and physically unfit for office.










posted on May, 31 2017 @ 08:36 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Ditto...

That is super dark for some one they have never even met...

Why would she break the law when she is legally allowed to insider trade, as is all our elected officials..

Why would she break the law when she is legally allowed to pay for play, exactly like all our politicians..

I wouldn't...

You wouldn't..

No intelligent human being is gonna break the law when they can (figuratively) rape and pillage America legally?!?!

Why would trump make a financial deal without having his army of lawyers make sure it is legal??

I wouldn't....

You wouldn't..


There are no mustache twirling villains.. there are no satanic cults..



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 08:45 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

I'm not doubting he is not mentally prepared for the office lol... I'm not sure very many humans are..

However , unless Putin taped the conversation of the deal (I would have..but no one knows) then trump is not putins puppet..

But assuming he did make a deal, that's probably treason.. lol

Imho if a deal was made, and I honestly think thst is the most logical conclusion..

It was a very specific deal, not trump swapping sides for good.

I don't think trump would have taken the deal if it required the death of one American..

But for dropping sanctions and staying out of Ukraine?!?!

That's the deal of the century!!!


Trading all your political opponents staff emails being dropped a month before the election, in exchange for stuff no 2 Americans give one flying flip over!!! (Sanctions and Ukraine)

If I think I won't get caught I prob take the deal...



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 10:43 AM
link   
People denying this and still blaming Russia?

Lol...



posted on May, 31 2017 @ 11:11 AM
link   

originally posted by: JoshuaCox
I don't see any functional difference between the two..

I meant technical difference.


Any hitman willing to kill the family if they knew who the leaker was.. knows it was Rich..

Spot on.


Any source wondering about assange outing them if they are killed , now thinks he will out them if they are killed..

I would expect him to do so. I would want that motive to be harder to brush off.
edit on 31-5-2017 by daskakik because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 4  5  6    8  9 >>

log in

join