Imho there is one part of the Seth rich murder and conspiracy that doesn't make any sense.. at least not how it was sold....
Ok so the whole Seth Rich conspiracy started with Jillian assange STRONGLY, and I do mean STRONGLY eluded to Seth Rich being the actual leak ,
instead of Russian hackers.
And by strongly I mean he basically said exactly that...
But when pressed about his comments by reporters he refused to actually confirm it was Seth because:
"wiki leaks does not reveal its sources.."
But Wikileaks did just reveal their sources.. assuming Rich was the leak....
Everyone on planet earth knew exactly what assange was saying....
No source that would not have come forward if assange confirmed it was Rich, is gonna come forward now that he basically said exactly that..
Assange refused the confirm it was Seth Rich, directly after confirming it was Seth Rich???
It is like me telling some ones wife:
"Man, Jimmy sure does risk your health by banging all those Prostitutes on the side.."
Then the wife asking:
"so your saying that jimmy is banging prostitutes!!??"
Then me replying :
I would never tell a friends wife if he were frequenting prostites...I'm just saying you should prob get checked... "
Jimmy will still be mad at you....
That literally doesn't make sense for either side of the Russian conspiracy debate..
It is just weird..
If your source is dead, and you are going to tell the world he was murdered.. what is the difference between what assange did and confirming it???
If your getting paid by the Russians to say it was Rich, why not confirm it??
No need to go there for media attention, he already had that with the leaks??
I guess there could be legal ramifications for actually confirming it,
edit on 30-5-2017 by JoshuaCox because: (no reason given)