It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Leaked FBI Memo Reveals Seth Rich Had DNC Documents On Laptop

page: 3
51
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:23 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme




Simple question. 
Why would the FBI have this mans laptop? 
Why would the FBI be involved in a DC street murder? 

Same answer for both questions. 

They wouldn't. 

Yet it seems that they do have it.




posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:23 AM
link   
a reply to: C84K2

Or....
They don't have his computer.

That's an option too you know.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:26 AM
link   
It is possible the FBI is reviewing the laptop in conjunction with their Russia hacking investigation. If Seth Rich was the source of the leaks and not Russia then the DNC lied to FBI investigators when they pushed the Russia lie. It also means the private company who performed the "analysis" of the DNC server, where they concluded Russia hacked it, also lied to the FBI.

It also might contain information that would undermine the immunity agreements hat were handed out like Candy under Lynch.

Just speculation...



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:27 AM
link   
a reply to: dragonridr

Not a random street shooting.
They don't investigate the family in a known street shooting.
Why would his computer have info about a random criminal in an event that didn't happen yet?
Nope more logic fail.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:27 AM
link   
TPTB must be soiling themselves, since the internet has exploded their dirty little secrets are getting through to more and more people, this snowball will always become greater, and they will be crushed, lets hope its soon



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:29 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: dragonridr

Not a random street shooting.
They don't investigate the family in a known street shooting.
Why would his computer have info about a random criminal in an event that didn't happen yet?
Nope more logic fail.


Actually yes they do. Family members will be investigated, especially in this instance where the guy is murdered with no clear suspect or motive. Contrary to what people see on tv the job of law enforcement is to eliminate people as suspects as much as it is to locate suspects. Family ties will be examined to see if issues / situations existed where a family member might want another family member dead.

This was not a random street shooting. The evidence in the public realm refutes that position.

I am curious if cameras were checked days / weeks / months prior to his death to see if someone was learning Seth Rich's routine. Where he ate at, where he and friends hang out, what route he takes homes, is it by car or on foot. Then you check for high crime areas to see if any of his actions takes him close to one. That way when you kill him it can be blamed on the actual person who was committing the crimes in the area.
edit on 28-5-2017 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:33 AM
link   
a reply to: C84K2

Why is "nothing taken" a consideration?
Couldn't a car coming down the street scare a thief off?
Couldn't an inexperienced thief get scared especially after shooting someone and simply run off?

The more assumptions you have to make, the less likely a story is true.
Occams razor.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:34 AM
link   
Kim dot com is talking about it on Twitter. Sorry I don't know how to post the actual tweets. There's a few.

Hmm I can't get the link to work.
edit on 28-5-2017 by C84K2 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Nikola014

From Miss Cleo?

A psychic.

Otherwise how would it mention an event that didn't happen until a week later?



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:38 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: C84K2

Why is "nothing taken" a consideration?
Couldn't a car coming down the street scare a thief off?
Couldn't an inexperienced thief get scared especially after shooting someone and simply run off?

The more assumptions you have to make, the less likely a story is true.
Occams razor.


Because when it comes to a "robbery" its rare for a person to kill their target and then rifle through their pockets in hopes of a payout. You have the person hand over all their valuables then you shoot. Less chance of trace evidence being left behind by the suspect if he doesnt have to touch the body himself. Secondly you never know who else is in the area so starting out with shooting is a problem in that it can draw attention when you dont want any.

There are other forensic issues I can delve into, like where he was shot at / how he was shot can give a possible motive as well as narrow down suspects.

I still believe the time and place was chosen in order to pass the murder of as belonging to the real criminal working the area.

Also if nothing was taken because someone was close by runs into the issue of no one reporting gun shots. No witnesses were identified.
edit on 28-5-2017 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

No it's not.
You watch too much tv.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:39 AM
link   
One more potential red flag here...maybe someone here who knows about official markings could jump in?

The document is marked 'classified'. I was under the impression that document classifications were Confidential, Secret, Top Secret.... not 'classified'


edit on 28/5/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:40 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Your double standards are outstanding too.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:41 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

No it's not.
You watch too much tv.


respectfully absent witnesses / forensic evidence a victims computer will be looked at. Was he being harassed on line? Who was he communicating with? Did he receive online threats? Was his computer hacked by someone giving them access to the pc / webcam / microphone and if so was seth being monitored by anyone?

People also have their own secrets they dont want getting out and sometime those secrets can break a case wide open.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth
One more potential red flag here...maybe someone here who knows about official markings could jump in?

The document is marked 'classified'. I was under the impression that document classifications were Confidential, Secret, Top Secret.... not 'classified'



Correct... You also have "unclassified" markings like UC-OUO (unclassified official use only) etc. As others have pointed out its looking like this "document" has a lot of red flags on it. Could it be real? Sure but I doubt5 it. The only thing I can think of is if someone obtained the document and then did their own redactions in order to cover their tracks.
edit on 28-5-2017 by Xcathdra because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:48 AM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

Because it mentioning an event that hadn't occurred yet isn't enough to prove its fake?



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:50 AM
link   
a reply to: butcherguy

Why would they take the victims laptop from his home to solve a random crime?
They wouldn't.
This isn't Criminal Minds or Law And Order...



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Wide-Eyes

Of suspects.
Not of victims of a street crime.



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:53 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

And consider it a more credible source too.
Amazing huh?



posted on May, 28 2017 @ 07:53 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: UKTruth

Because it mentioning an event that hadn't occurred yet isn't enough to prove its fake?



Seth Rich was murdered on July 10th. The memo is dated July 15th.

edit on 28/5/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
51
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join