posted on Feb, 4 2005 @ 11:59 PM
Originally posted by Kyle325is
You state that Iran sits on top of a giant oil supply...why then do they "need" to pursue nuclear power?
You state that the U.S. administration is salivating at the idea of attacking Iran for it's oil. I'm sure you said the same about Iraq. Provide us
with info on how much oil the U.S. uses that comes out of Iraq. It's not much.
When Iran openly supports terrorism against the west, how do you think the west should respond? I suppose just roll over, as obviously we should when
any nation decides to support the killing of any and all possible western civilians, then decides it wants to pose nuclear threats for it's
To your first question: Yes this is odd as it would be more cost effective and beneficial to utilize their abundance of natural gas. And it is
troublesome that the Iranian officials are steadfast in their lack of willingness to negotiate.
Your second statement makes no sense with regard to my previous idea and conclusion...please rephrase.
To your third question: Take a good hard look at how we have treated and manipulated Iran in the past. I'm not saying we should not investigate a
potential threat but I fear we are allowing our administration to police the world to their own beneficial ends because of the tragedy of 9/11.
"The high office of President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the Americans freedom, and before I leave office I must inform the citizen of
--John Fitzgerald Kennedy Columbia University, 10 days before his assassination
In my opinion this is still the case.
But dude....if I may call you dude...this is about money/power/control. I've made my statement and provided a link (which you obviously have ignored)
to help any that wish to look 20/20. Ignore it if you like....it matters not.
[edit on 5-2-2005 by antipigopolist]