It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Nibiru was suppose to pass in 2003, so what happened?

page: 1

log in


posted on Feb, 4 2005 @ 11:28 AM
I've been reading on Nibiru, and all the sources I've read say Nibiru was suppose to pass in spring/summer of 2003, so what happened?

posted on Feb, 4 2005 @ 11:52 AM
Multiple choice answer:
  1. They were wrong.

  2. Nancy is nuts.

  3. Nibru doesn't exist.

  4. All of the above.

    extra credit:

    Where is Puppy Lake?

    [edit on 4-2-2005 by HowardRoark]

posted on Feb, 4 2005 @ 01:18 PM
No #e, sherlock. Of course, they were wrong about the time, but what happened? I don't even see why you post you post on here. I have yet to see one contributory post. Also, there is no "nibru", so stfu. It's "Nibiru". Second, Nancy isn't the only one that says there's a 10th planet. 3rd:

And finally, do yourself a favor and off yourself.

posted on Feb, 4 2005 @ 01:29 PM
The following picture, straight from Zetatalk, represents what?

  1. The transit of Planet X and Y?

  2. A pair of UFOs about to crash into the sun.

  3. The debunkers are WRONG, there is no such thing as Lens Flare.

  4. Nancy is still nuts.

    Extra Credt: name one credible astronomer that believes in Nibiru* ?

    I'm not talking about Sedna. That has not been officially classified as a planet and it is nowhere near ever coming near Earth.

    [edit on 4-2-2005 by HowardRoark]

    [edit on 4-2-2005 by HowardRoark]

posted on Feb, 4 2005 @ 01:31 PM
"And finally, do yourself a favor and off yourself."

What a way to start a debate. I believe this has been talked about before.

posted on Feb, 4 2005 @ 01:35 PM
I don't think he or she wants to debate.

The fact that Nibiru never came as predicted speaks for itself, doesn't it?

posted on Feb, 4 2005 @ 01:38 PM
Sure does, I still check up on Nancy's site every now and then for a good laugh.


posted on Feb, 4 2005 @ 03:08 PM
Nice lens flares, neither forgeting that cleaning lens sometimes might be good idea.
Or more likely she has already used too much and too strong solvents... but clearly not enough to solve bigger problem.

I can't really see how Sedna could be called as planet, it's orbit is so much different.

And KBO's might be considerably smaller than originally thought.

posted on Feb, 4 2005 @ 03:47 PM

They were wrong. Nancy is nuts. Nibru doesn't exist.

Originally posted by a3s73rg30ne
No #e, sherlock.

.... Well, i guess thats all there is too it, the planet didn't exist, they were wrong about it anyway, and that woman was nuts.

posted on Feb, 4 2005 @ 06:02 PM
I'm getting a mod in this thread. Some of your coments are very crude and against ATS policy.

posted on Jul, 23 2008 @ 05:22 PM
Hey, just wondering where did you get the prediction that it was going to be 2003? Last i checked the ancient calanders it never changed from 2012. So where are all the dates coming from? Maybe from people who want attention.

BUT the date hasn't changed from what i notice. Its been 2012, from nostradamus, merlin, mayans, summerians, and many more i don't feel like listing.

top topics


log in