It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

NSA Chief Admits Trump Colluded with Russia!

page: 3
22
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 27 2017 @ 01:00 AM
link   
John Schindler hates President Trump more than Putin.

He loved him some Obama.

His twitter feed has been nothing but Trump bashing 27/4 and conspiracy theories.

This guy is not credible, his hatred clouds his judgement.




posted on May, 27 2017 @ 01:27 AM
link   
This thread is awesome.

This needs more flags.

The truth is finally coming out.

All of the right wingers have kept screaming "wheres the proof?! wheres the proof?!"

Well.. here it comes.. you asked for it



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 01:45 AM
link   
Looks like it is war against american people by Trump, MSM and MIC. "We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." - Thats the biggest conspiracy of it all, they can execute their hidden agenda while people are fighting over crowd sizes, small hands, two scoops of ice cream.

It is so sad to see our US presidency have become a 'Made for TV Episode' - Head of the Executive Branch in one episode and Executive Producer in the other. And both appears in same MSM




Now back to scheduled programming, carry on...



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 03:18 AM
link   
a reply to: kurthall

NSA Chief Admits Trump Colluded with Russia.

NSA Chief Claims Trump Colluded with Russia.



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 03:34 AM
link   
So an opinion piece is now considered iron clad fact?

Wow the bar has fallen here... I have used some sketchy sources in the past but never an opinion piece...



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 04:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: Irishhaf
So an opinion piece is now considered iron clad fact?

Wow the bar has fallen here... I have used some sketchy sources in the past but never an opinion piece...


Did you read it?

It wasnt the guys opinion that the Chief of the NSA outed Trump.. it actually happened and he reported it



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 08:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lucidparadox

originally posted by: Irishhaf
So an opinion piece is now considered iron clad fact?

Wow the bar has fallen here... I have used some sketchy sources in the past but never an opinion piece...


Did you read it?

It wasnt the guys opinion that the Chief of the NSA outed Trump.. it actually happened and he reported it


Incorrect. The source is John Schindler and he claims to have spoken to someone who was in a Town Hall where Rogers was speaking.

Use your brain. You have to believe that Rogers said this, more than he said to the investigative committees, in an broadcast town hall.


This week’s town hall event, which was broadcast to agency facilities worldwide, was therefore met with surprise and anticipation by the NSA workforce, and Rogers did not disappoint. I have spoken with several NSA officials who witnessed the director’s talk and I’m reporting their firsthand accounts, which corroborate each other, on condition of anonymity.


If that were true this story would be breaking from multiple sources.

Add to this that Schindler was kicked out of the NSA for sending pictures of his dick to a young woman online... he got the knickname "Mr Dick Pic". Since then he has gone on to become somewhat of a twiiter conspiracy theorist and Trump hater. This is like Anthony Weiner saying he spoke to someone who heard Rogers say Trump colluded with Russia.

Perhaps you would like to be a bit less eager to jump all in to a story just because it says what you want it to say.

edit on 27/5/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 10:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: Mike.Ockizard
a reply to: Liquesence

So naturally we should just trust any anonymous source?


Any? no. But, anonymity is also safety.

Anonymous sources have been a (beneficial) cornerstone of the press for a very long time. No reason to suddenly not trust them simply because the information they provide doesn't fit with one's preferred narrative or because a few might have been wrong.



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 10:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Mike.Ockizard
a reply to: Liquesence

So naturally we should just trust any anonymous source?


Any? no. But, anonymity is also safety.

Anonymous sources have been a (beneficial) cornerstone of the press for a very long time. No reason to suddenly not trust them simply because the information they provide doesn't fit with one's preferred narrative or because a few might have been wrong.


Nope, there is no reason to trust any anonymous source until their information has been verified.
You can still partake in gossip until that point, but that is all it is.

Right now you are trusting a disgraced former NSA analyst who left the NSA 13 years ago and has claimed of a NSA townhall broadcast worldwide where the NSA head publicly confirmed collusion, yet there seems to be no other source. Do you reckon no one else knew about it? We have no idea whether this story is true, yet under these circumstances you want to err on the side of 'prove it's false'?????
edit on 27/5/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 10:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Mike.Ockizard
a reply to: Liquesence

So naturally we should just trust any anonymous source?


Any? no. But, anonymity is also safety.

Anonymous sources have been a (beneficial) cornerstone of the press for a very long time. No reason to suddenly not trust them simply because the information they provide doesn't fit with one's preferred narrative or because a few might have been wrong.


Nope, there is no reason to trust any anonymous source until their information has been verified.
You can still partake in gossip until that point, but that is all it is.


It usually is verified, and it usually comes from a credible source who actually knows what's going on. That's why it's not gossip.

Sorry that it doesn't fit with your preferred narrative, though.
edit on 27-5-2017 by Liquesence because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 10:24 AM
link   

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: Mike.Ockizard
a reply to: Liquesence

So naturally we should just trust any anonymous source?


Any? no. But, anonymity is also safety.

Anonymous sources have been a (beneficial) cornerstone of the press for a very long time. No reason to suddenly not trust them simply because the information they provide doesn't fit with one's preferred narrative or because a few might have been wrong.


Nope, there is no reason to trust any anonymous source until their information has been verified.
You can still partake in gossip until that point, but that is all it is.


It usually is verified, and it usually comes from a source who actually knows what's going on. That's why it's not gossip.

Sorry that it doesn't fit with your preferred narrative, though.


When any of it is verified, then let us all know.
In the meantime there is a special counsel who will review all he wants to and determine the veracity of such claims.

Until then gossip away, but please don't whine about sensible people not buying into your gossip without proof.

edit on 27/5/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 10:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lucidparadox

originally posted by: Irishhaf
So an opinion piece is now considered iron clad fact?

Wow the bar has fallen here... I have used some sketchy sources in the past but never an opinion piece...


Did you read it?

It wasnt the guys opinion that the Chief of the NSA outed Trump.. it actually happened and he reported it


I wouldn't be so sure, the story seems fake to me and I hate Trump with a passion.

It's a pretty major story that would make front page news if true and run for weeks, yet it's burried in the opinion section of the site which hints at editorial distrust/distancing from the claims. That doesn't automatically mean he's lying but the fact respectable news orgs aren't running with the story strongly suggests they don't buy it either.



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 01:02 PM
link   

originally posted by: Lucidparadox

originally posted by: Irishhaf
So an opinion piece is now considered iron clad fact?

Wow the bar has fallen here... I have used some sketchy sources in the past but never an opinion piece...


Did you read it?

It wasnt the guys opinion that the Chief of the NSA outed Trump.. it actually happened and he reported it


Actually I did read it... they filed it under an opinion piece to give them legal wiggle room if someone comes at them over the story.

If they truly believed it was a 100% legit story it would have been front page the crown jewel of the news organization, this way they can just go what... we trusted him woops thats why it was his opinion not the official stance of this organization.



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 02:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Liquesence




Anonymous sources have been a (beneficial) cornerstone of the press for a very long time. No reason to suddenly not trust them simply because the information they provide doesn't fit with one's preferred narrative or because a few might have been wrong.

Except that didn't apply during the last guys administration. So now suddenly every and all anonymous sources are believable and true? I see it gets to be true because it in sync with your beliefs. Too many things were let go by that kind of thinking during Obamas terms, it didn't fit the media and Democrat narrative! We had alleged spying on members of the press and a Attorney General held in contempt of Congress, but sure lets indulge your Russian/Trump fantasies! Funny that five years after Romney declared Russia to be one of the biggest geo-political problems we are now seeing that narrative play out. So was Obama and company in denial or was they just that clueless that only now are we seeing how correct Romney was????



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 02:04 PM
link   
a reply to: hangedman13

It absolutely applied. Why do you think the Obama administration used the Espionage Act against more people than any other administration before him?

Not to mention the administration itself had a penchant for leaking classified information to the press.

Obama administration leaks



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 02:16 PM
link   
a reply to: AnonyMason

And now add Jerad in to the mix....

www.washingtonpost.com... m_term=.467783ebfa6a



The WH clown car is in the ditch! Believe me, it's sad!

Call fake news all you want....the investigations will continue and it's gonna get real.
edit on 27-5-2017 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 02:42 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: AnonyMason

And now add Jerad in to the mix....

www.washingtonpost.com... m_term=.467783ebfa6a

and

www.washingtonpost.com... m_term=.467783ebfa6a

The WH clown car is in the ditch! Believe me, it's sad!

Call fake news all you want....the investigations will continue and it's gonna get real.


Lol, let us know when it does get real.
edit on 27/5/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 02:48 PM
link   
OMG! Guys! Guys! This thread and the OP are right ... It's breaking now, the memo. Trump is going down.




posted on May, 27 2017 @ 03:05 PM
link   

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: AnonyMason

And now add Jerad in to the mix....

www.washingtonpost.com... m_term=.467783ebfa6a

and

www.washingtonpost.com... m_term=.467783ebfa6a

The WH clown car is in the ditch! Believe me, it's sad!

Call fake news all you want....the investigations will continue and it's gonna get real.


Lol, let us know when it does get real.


I think it's real now. When Cal Thomas; one of the most respected conservatives on the planet, see's thru Trumps Bull Sh!t, it's real.

calthomas.com...

George Will....also respected conservaive and nailed Trump to a T..

www.washingtonpost.com... 641a

There's more....

www.mediamatters.org...
edit on 27-5-2017 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)


Real enough for ya??

I have no respect whatsoever for lipstick conservatives more attuned to personality worship than policy. Sorry, imo that's you!
edit on 27-5-2017 by olaru12 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 04:22 PM
link   

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: olaru12
a reply to: AnonyMason

And now add Jerad in to the mix....

www.washingtonpost.com... m_term=.467783ebfa6a

and

www.washingtonpost.com... m_term=.467783ebfa6a

The WH clown car is in the ditch! Believe me, it's sad!

Call fake news all you want....the investigations will continue and it's gonna get real.


Lol, let us know when it does get real.


I think it's real now. When Cal Thomas; one of the most respected conservatives on the planet, see's thru Trumps Bull Sh!t, it's real.

calthomas.com...

George Will....also respected conservaive and nailed Trump to a T..

www.washingtonpost.com... 641a

There's more....

www.mediamatters.org...

Real enough for ya??

I have no respect whatsoever for lipstick conservatives more attuned to personality worship than policy. Sorry, imo that's you!


No, it becomes real when there is actual evidence.
One of your links is over a year old.
Let's take the first Conservative from that list.


Mark Levin: “I Am Not Voting For Donald Trump. Period.” The conservative radio host reacted to an attack on him by Trump ally Roger Stone by declaring, “I am not voting for Donald Trump. Period.” He added, “Count me as never Trump.”


Levin voted for Trump.

Let us know when it gets real.
edit on 27/5/2017 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
22
<< 1  2    4 >>

log in

join