The Jared Kushner story is a perfect example of fake news

a reply to: neoholographic

Is anyone surprised that a pack of greedy, self interested thieves are ratting each other out to the press? The White House are "wrangling like pirates," as Shakespeare put it in Richard III. Trump supporters should probably read that and the "Scottish Play" to understand what is going on in Washington these days.

a reply to: DJW001

and the lunatics on the left should apply the same level of proof in the news that the UFO forum uses to prove the existence of ET. Instead, you all act like the flat earth crowd. (BTW, it's really round)

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: DJW001

and the lunatics on the left should apply the same level of proof in the news that the UFO forum uses to prove the existence of ET. Instead, you all act like the flat earth crowd. (BTW, it's really round)

Meanwhile, Trump supporters jam their fingers in their ears, shut their eyes and scream "Nothing to see here! Nothing to see here!" But then, this is not the Mud Pit, is it?

a reply to: neoholographic

Luckily most people do not think the stories are fake.
Only on ATS and other alternative facts sites
In the real world we know the stories are not fake.
How much this means remains to be seen.

Kushner is now suspected of espionage.

a reply to: Wide-Eyes

I don't think he will want to.
He doesn't strike me as loving the job so far.
Maybe, now he got a giant gold necklace.
But he seems pretty dissatisfied with the job so far.

a reply to: neoholographic

Another fantasy.

Yeah you could just see how well he was received....
By the Muslims.

The Europeans not so much.

originally posted by: 3NL1GHT3N3D1
So how do they plan on "taking him down" if they know their stories are fake news? If it's fake then they have no chance of taking him down because it's false information and will never hold up in a court of law.

What they're doing is playing with the emotions and biases of the American people and others abroad, nothing more or less. It's propaganda aimed at both sides so that tensions will rise between the people.

The media doesn't really have a beef with Trump, at least not the ones who tell the anchors what to talk about, the owners of the media. All this is is a psyop with Trump being a willing participant to divide the American people down party lines. It's working and people are absolutely eating it up.

Sad!

It is designed to influence elections, ironically.

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: DJW001

and the lunatics on the left should apply the same level of proof in the news that the UFO forum uses to prove the existence of ET. Instead, you all act like the flat earth crowd. (BTW, it's really round)

Meanwhile, Trump supporters jam their fingers in their ears, shut their eyes and scream "Nothing to see here! Nothing to see here!" But then, this is not the Mud Pit, is it?

When there is actually something to see, please let us know. Better still post it.

a reply to: Liquesence

And they want those logs, e mails and anything else they have going back two years to the beginning of the campaign.

a reply to: neoholographic

Again Kennedy was president.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: DJW001

and the lunatics on the left should apply the same level of proof in the news that the UFO forum uses to prove the existence of ET. Instead, you all act like the flat earth crowd. (BTW, it's really round)

Meanwhile, Trump supporters jam their fingers in their ears, shut their eyes and scream "Nothing to see here! Nothing to see here!" But then, this is not the Mud Pit, is it?

When there is actually something to see, please let us know. Better still post it.

There's plenty to see and read, you guys just intentionally ignore it or simply brush it aside as fake without consideration just because it's unfavorable to your narrative.

originally posted by: buster2010

originally posted by: neoholographic
Here's more from the Cuban Missle Crisis that talks about how Kennedy and Khrushchev communicated through back channels but EVERYBODY ALREADY KNOWS THIS!!

During the crisis, the two sides exchanged many letters and other communications, both formal and “back channel.”

www.loc.gov...

This is fake news and Russia hysteria!

Obama established back channels with Iran. The media didn't go nuts!

This is Trump Derangement Syndrome!!

Trump wasn't President unlike those other people you mentioned who were President at the time. Makes a big difference.

Actually it does not. He was already elected and the transition was underway. Setting up back channels of communication with new contacts was part of that. Please provide some evidence that the President Elect is legally bound not to talk foreign govts in the way he deems appropriate.

Trump, Kushner, Flynn news

Porn for liberals.

originally posted by: Liquesence

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: DJW001

and the lunatics on the left should apply the same level of proof in the news that the UFO forum uses to prove the existence of ET. Instead, you all act like the flat earth crowd. (BTW, it's really round)

Meanwhile, Trump supporters jam their fingers in their ears, shut their eyes and scream "Nothing to see here! Nothing to see here!" But then, this is not the Mud Pit, is it?

When there is actually something to see, please let us know. Better still post it.

There's plenty to see and read, you guys just intentionally ignore it or simply brush it aside as fake without consideration just because it's unfavorable to your narrative.

So post it. Post the actual evidence of a crime that we should be taking more seriously.
The onus always remains on those accusing someone of a crime to prove it. It is perfectly reasonable to reject accusations until actual evidence is provided. Even for non crimes, you still have to post some evidence. Saying "someone said" constitutes nothing more than gossip.

You are complaining that Trump supporters refuse to give any credence to your gossip, nothing more.

Case in point... you have declared as true the gossip from a disgraced ex-NSA analyst that there was worldwide broadcast NSA town hall where Rodgers stated that Trump colluded with Russia. Such an event broadcast to thousands must have more sources than this ex-NSA sexual deviant who was not even there and left the NSA 13 years ago. Yet you didn't even bother to dig deeper into the story. Have you even checked whether there was even such a town hall that took place?

I'll wait for your evidence that you say we are ignoring.

a reply to: neoholographic

So why didn't trump set up this type of communications with any other countries? Just the country that hacked the DNC and were being sanctioned by the sitting president for messing in the election.
The messing of which allowed him to win. Funny enough.
And why only with a known adversary not with any allys?
Why was Russia the only one?

a reply to: UKTruth

So post it. Post the actual evidence of a crime that we should be taking more seriously.

Um, it's already been posted on ATS in various others threads. Go read those threads (as I'm sure you've already done) and stop ignoring things (as I'm sure you've also done).

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: UKTruth

So post it. Post the actual evidence of a crime that we should be taking more seriously.

Um, it's already been posted on ATS in various others threads. Go read those threads (as I'm sure you've already done) and stop ignoring things (as I'm sure you've also done).

So far only gossip has been posted.

If you have more than gossip, post it.

Kushner is the MSM-generated FAKE news, designed to take our minds off of Comey's non-existent MEMOS.

I wonder what block-buster distraction the liberal media is coming up with, in preparation for the 4 Trump-Russia-Collusion investigations not finding anything.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: Liquesence
a reply to: UKTruth

So post it. Post the actual evidence of a crime that we should be taking more seriously.

Um, it's already been posted on ATS in various others threads. Go read those threads (as I'm sure you've already done) and stop ignoring things (as I'm sure you've also done).

So far only gossip has been posted.

Thank you for proving my point.

a reply to: UKTruth

There's only one president at a time and it wasn't trump then.
That's the bottom line.
Again why only Russia if it's such a common thing?