It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FBI illegally shared spy data on Americans with private parties

page: 2
17
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 26 2017 @ 08:45 AM
link   
a reply to: dawnstar

Looks like it was "amplified" a few years ago.





posted on May, 26 2017 @ 08:46 AM
link   
a reply to: TrueBrit

I always see you around and the majority of the time I agree with what you post. At least when I don't agree, you give me a decent position to oppose from. You do good work.



posted on May, 26 2017 @ 08:47 AM
link   

originally posted by: Antipathy17
a reply to: TrueBrit

I always see you around and the majority of the time I agree with what you post. At least when I don't agree, you give me a decent position to oppose from. You do good work.


the man is a man
that is why you respect him



posted on May, 26 2017 @ 08:55 AM
link   
Who's watching the watchmen?

Everyone is watching, there is just no accountability.

It will likely get worse before it gets any better.

SMH



posted on May, 26 2017 @ 09:26 AM
link   
a reply to: Antipathy17

I appreciate your sentiments Antipathy17.

The way I see it, we owe the subject matter the respect it requires, in order that we learn something worth knowing from the discussion.



posted on May, 26 2017 @ 01:57 PM
link   
Gee I wonder who these private parties could be?

The DNC is a private party.

Correct the Record is a private party.

ShartBlue is a private party.



posted on May, 26 2017 @ 08:13 PM
link   
a reply to: AnonyMason



You have this backwards. It's the corporations that share their collected data with the alphabet boys at NSA, CIA, FBIA, DIA, etc. Take your pick on the acronym. They all do it. This is the reason companies like Google, Verizon, AOL, ATT, Yahoo, Microsuck, and any other Internet/communications company has "lack of privacy" policies.


I think I got it right. I know a fact, a corporation *cough* Xerox *cough* had access to government information, a totally closed and independent system from theirs.

It was for tax purposes however.



posted on May, 26 2017 @ 08:30 PM
link   
NSA cannot be shut down they are above the laws of the land.

Fact be told, no one can hold the NSA accountable because, they have the dirt on everyone.



posted on May, 26 2017 @ 11:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Dem0nc1eaner

Liberty has a cost.

Pay up.


Nope. Liberty is free. It is security that comes with costs.



posted on May, 27 2017 @ 05:39 AM
link   
a reply to: Woodcarver

Nonsense.

If you have such security that you are at minimal risk, the cost is your liberty. The cost of liberty therefore, is that one must limit the security provided by governments, states and nations, relegating a significant portion of that responsibility to the citizenry, absent any organisation or element of governmental control. That is all security as you know it today amounts to. It does not protect your liberty and your rights nearly as much as it damages them, despite its stated aims being the opposite. This you cannot fail to be aware of, so why would you argue against it?



new topics

top topics



 
17
<< 1   >>

log in

join