Strieber's now going ape-#, blaming anti-Semites, racists, and MUFON for the paper about him:
The writer who called BS on Strieber left a pretty good comment below Strieber's blog:
A message from 'Heinrich Moltke':
An Answer to Whitley Strieber
by the author of "Problems with Strieber and The Key"
Recently, I completed an in-depth study of "The Key". At over three hundred pages, it is a scholarly, comprehensive, and detailed analysis of the book
together with the issues surrounding it.
The paper is not a piece of debunking. I am not a debunker. I am someone who followed Strieber's work for more than two decades, bought his books, and
even wrote pieces defending him. I am of the opinion that many people who claim to have had 'contact' are neither lying nor hallucinating, and that
therefore we have a duty to assist them though we may have no idea what is happening.
I feel I should point out that I'm also not a UFO partisan. I don't buy the Steven Greer space brothers interpretation. But nor do I think that UFO
phenomena are best understood as faerie lore come to life. I suspect that like everything else, UFO phenomena represent something more and different
than we realize.
I am not a member of MUFON. I am also not an anti-Semite.
Yesterday, in response to my paper, Whitley Strieber left the following comment on his website:
Moltke is not meant as an anagram. It is a reference to a Nazi diplomat who worked in Poland in WWII, and is used by this man, in my opinion, because
of sympathies for the Nazi movement. Understand that I know the actual identity of "Heinrich Moltke." We looked him up because of some of the
disturbing comments he left on Unknowncountry in the 6 years he was there. After Jeremy had him blocked, he reappeared under another name for a while,
but left on his own.
I believe that this person may suffer from paranoia, among other things. He has been under treatment for mental illness in the past as he admits on
the internet under other of his aliases. I also believe him to be a virulent anti-Semite. If I am right, then these two things together--the
anti-Semitism and the paranoia--explain the poor creature's obsession with the Key. I say "poor creature" because of other things I know about him.
Posted by Whitley on 08 Jun 2017 at 09:16
Despite the conviction we often hear expressed by Whitley Strieber that he "knows", nothing in the above comment is true other than that my
subscription to unknowncountry.com was canceled after I left sarcastic comments on Jeremy Vaeni's show page. One of the comments, though it was
directed at Vaeni, was re-interpreted as an attack on Anne Strieber. The leaving 'disturbing' comments, re-appearing under another name, and so on -
It should also go without saying that I have not been "under treatment for mental illness". If I were (or ever had been) I wouldn't go bragging about
it on the internet. I am also not an anti-Semite. I think the world would be far for the worse if we didn't have Heifetz or Menuhin, Einstein and
Bohr. 'Curb Your Enthusiasm' is my favorite comedy show. (Little known fact: William Shatner is Jewish. How could anyone hate Captain Kirk?)
I would like to stress that the above accusations against me and from Strieber come simply in the context of my writing a paper that patiently,
painstakingly, and fairly examines his work. It's notable that Strieber's first reaction to this study of his work is to call the author a
One might conclude that Strieber does not want his fans or paying subscribers reading the paper. This is why in his latest Journal, he both fails to
mention the paper directly, instead writing of "attacks", and confuses the issue completely by mixing in Jeff Rense's anti-semitic attacks on 'The
Key' from almost twenty years ago, as well as the completely unrelated issue of a MUFON member who recently posted bigoted remarks on Facebook.
More important, though, in the same Journal is the bigger confusion that Strieber creates as he walks back his claims about the reality of the 'true
encounter'. No, the issue is not that there is a book whose authorship "nobody can ever prove one way or the other, not even me". The issue is that
Strieber has for years been talking about a Master of the Key who looked a certain way, talked a certain way. An event. He also said the text was a
"transcription" that was "ninety percent accurate".
On that score, one can in fact prove that the conversation in "The Key" comes from Strieber. I did it. It took over 300 pages to do. No
academically-trained person, especially in literature, can read the analysis done and not conclude that the content of "The Key" comes from Strieber.
There is no reason to think any of it came from anybody else. Not only is it demonstrable, it is almost incredible how clearly this can be
Strieber in his Journal falls back on the pithy 'sin is the denial of the right to thrive' as proof the Master of the Key wasn't him. But this fits
perfectly into Strieber's own unique brand of naturalism. Defining sin - one of Strieber's enduring preoccupations - in terms of life, its impact or
cost on life is perfectly consistent with his work. Strieber also cites another point in his Journal - the speculation about the Holocaust and the
loss of intelligent genes. Ironically, this is a point I'd accept as quite possibly true. I think probably a good portion of our intelligent numbers
were killed off during the Holocaust. Is this something Strieber would never have thought of? For a man who is constantly talking about evolution,
physics, populations, Nazis and the Holocaust, it seems like it would come easily.
I won't re-litigate the issues of the paper here. I will note that there is a kind of depressing irony reading Strieber writing in his Journal about
conscience and facing "inner selves". Because what we see in Strieber in relation to his book "The Key" is a frantic, panicked denial and a
willingness to try any argument to avoid having to face what is painfully obvious to everyone else. In just this one Journal, Strieber holds
simultaneous positions (the 'true encounter' happened/maybe it didn't but the text still has "moral force") as he often does with the effect that if
you criticize one, he can fall back and say he was advocating the other. He also invokes racism and anti-Semitism as a way of trying to avoid the
plain conclusion that "The Key" is a product of his imagination.
People have been having anomalous experiences since the beginning. It's a sad fact that in our culture, these people don't get support when as result
of them they suffer. But just because these experiences happen doesn't mean Whitley Strieber doesn't have a unique and pervasive problem with
imagination and confabulation. If he had any intellectual self-respect, he would face the problem squarely instead of blaming "sinister forces",
anti-Semitism, and so on. I think the emotional support system of his website, his fans, should help him.