It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UK May Stop Sharing Intel w/ US Due to Leaks

page: 1
9
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:13 PM
link   
UK May Stop Sharing Intel w/ US Due to Leaks

So the past 2 weeks we've been listening to claims Trump damaged our intel relationships with allies, which was completely unsubstantiated being that what they claimed happened in the Russia meeting has been refuted and the ally which was supposed to be upset (Israel) said there was no problem. Here we have a confirmed case of actual leaks from scumbags who don't take their oath seriously actually damaging our intel relationship with a very key ally.

Thoughts?




posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:14 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

Make sense. Our government is behaving like a 3rd world dictatorship.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:16 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

The never Trumpers would gladly destroy America while he's in office just so he's attached to it.

I don't even like the guy, but it's clear the Democrats have no interest in introspection or finding why they lost.

Just so long as he goes down in flames, the country can too.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:16 PM
link   
The media is already spinning this as Trump's fault, not the sore losers trying to sabotage the US government out of political spite.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:20 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

Really ? Unsubstantiated means it can't be proven. Just sayin.

He admitted he told the Russians about the laptop bombs.
But he didn't tell them the Intel came from Israel.

That is until he said on tv to Netanyahu but I never told them it was you... never mentioned Israel.
Rolls eyes...

And a transcript from his convo with Dutertes when he tells him the location of our nuclear submarines.
You know the vessels who's location is top secret???

Now, review what unsubstantiated means because the claims that he's a big mouth with loose lips is quite substantiated.
edit on 5252017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:20 PM
link   
We have a bunch of blabbermouths in this country, they cannot keep a lid on anything. Even if their job requires them to be very protective of what they have info of, they will tell others and jeopardize an investigation or cause harm to innocent people. We need to start charging people who do that with crimes because this seems to be as bad as treason.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:22 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

It's been refuted? It was refuted for about five minutes. Now the party line is, Trump can declassify anything he wants... which he can. But he definitely told the Russians things... he even said in Israel, that he didn't mention Israel in the conversation. Then it comes out that he told Duterte that we had two nuclear submarines off the coast of North Korea. Then while the hunt was on for associates of the monster loser that suicide bombed a teenage crowd at a concert and didn't want the guys name released, our media just went ahead and broadcast his name.

I couldn't blame any nation for rethinking sharing intelligence with the US right now.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Kali74

He told one guy where the submarines were....

But now billions of people know because some anti Trumper leaked it to the world.

Which is worse?

(they're both bad)

But thanks for proving my point above.

Anything he does bad the Democrats will do worse to sabotage his presidency.

While his presidency may be a stain on America, the democrats will make it worse while saying Barrack Bush was the best president ever. Bombing seven countries and spying on citizens in a way that would make WWII Germany jealous.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:32 PM
link   
a reply to: CriticalStinker

You keep assuming the leaks are coming from the anti Trump crowd...
How do you know that?



As to the topic, the UK & US will never stop sharing intelligence.

This is all a distraction from Conservative failures that led to the terror attack in the first place.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:33 PM
link   
a reply to: CriticalStinker


Which is worse?

The person who opened their mouth first. If Trump had kept his mouth shut then all those other people wouldn't know about it would they?


Anything he does bad the Democrats will do worse to sabotage his presidency.

Then maybe it would help if Trump stopped doing bad stuff.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:35 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408



This is all a distraction from Conservative failures that led to the terror attack in the first place.


Please elaborate.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:36 PM
link   
a reply to: buster2010

So you agree they are stooping even lower to sabotage him because of "bad stuff" ?
edit on 25-5-2017 by knowledgehunter0986 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:39 PM
link   
a reply to: face23785

Wish I knew if we receive much of value from UK Intel. Of course we'll never know.. It's classified.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:39 PM
link   
a reply to: knowledgehunter0986

For the last decade under Conservative rule in the U.K. we've seen not only very drastic cuts to Policing, but also an inept use of intelligence when it comes to combatting terror...

It's a miracle there haven't been more attacks, in all honesty.

An Imam warned the intelligence services about this maniac 5 weeks ago and nothing was done.

For reasons...



But "all look over here" says Theresa May (Prime Minister), "leaks are the problem"...
It's a f*cking joke.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:41 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408


This is all a distraction from Conservative failures that led to the terror attack in the first place.


Wow, a little soon to politicize the attack, don't you think?

Believe it or not, Islamic extremists could give two f###s about which side is in power. It's not who represents our countries, it's what our countries represent.

Keep on going with the partisan parade though, the only hope of a progressive future is one without the one party with two branches.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:44 PM
link   
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Because Dutertes released the transcripts. Please...



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:45 PM
link   
a reply to: CriticalStinker

Read my above post.

There is nothing partisan about it, Critical...
Just pure unadulterated facts.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:50 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: face23785

It's been refuted? It was refuted for about five minutes. Now the party line is, Trump can declassify anything he wants... which he can. But he definitely told the Russians things... he even said in Israel, that he didn't mention Israel in the conversation. Then it comes out that he told Duterte that we had two nuclear submarines off the coast of North Korea. Then while the hunt was on for associates of the monster loser that suicide bombed a teenage crowd at a concert and didn't want the guys name released, our media just went ahead and broadcast his name.

I couldn't blame any nation for rethinking sharing intelligence with the US right now.


You're confused. It's been refuted. AND in addition, even if it was true, it's not an issue because he can declassify anything he wants. Those aren't mutually exclusive concepts. Nice try at obfuscation though. No matter how you try to spin it, the narrative that he was reckless and damaged our intel relationships was false. This actually IS reckless and damaged our intel relationships. Stay on the ball.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:52 PM
link   
The editor, and the journalist(s) in that biased #rag should be told that their time spent in prison, and the severity of the experience will be dependent on how co-operative they are in the investigation.



posted on May, 25 2017 @ 01:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Hazardous1408


There is nothing partisan about it, Critical...
Just pure unadulterated facts.


Fact is while the West kills people in the middle east, some of them will want to kill us.

And contrary to what you said, it doesn't matter who's in power.

Continue on your high horse with your "facts", so long as it benefits your side.



new topics

top topics



 
9
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join