11+ Years of WIKILEAKS~100% True

And we have CNN, fox,
yes fox 2nd, they are not what trump supporters think
At any rate
Name the news we call news and insert

Assange and WIKILEAKS have never been debunked

Name one news source with better

INTEGRITY
ACCURACY
JOURNALISM

So as far as fake news goes, it's all written for delivery

Find a source better

a reply to: iWontGiveUP

Amen. Any US citizen who is against Wikileaks is thinking purely about their personal political beliefs and not about the good they do. They divulge things which never be divulged and which are done daily to us or in our name. We were built on the idea of an open government. Over the decades we have become a need to know citizenry, and apparently we don't need to know anything.

a reply to: TobyFlenderson

From time to time the tree of liberty needs help

a reply to: iWontGiveUP

Especially when the "Free Press" and the 4th Estate is completely coopted by 6 corporations.

a reply to: iWontGiveUP

Wikileaks could be the greatest propaganda outlet the corporations ever had! Everyone just assumes whatever they publish is absolute fact.

Att bought DirectTv
Verizon bought yahoo

That 6 is consolidating

Remember a real hardware store?

a reply to: dfnj2015

It's not an assumption when no one can prove that they published anything that wasn't genuine. I'm not sure I've ever heard anyone claim that it wasn't genuine. Also, if he was a propaganda outlet for the powerful, why has he been holed up in an embassy for 7 years? You're just pissed because he proved your candidate was as crooked as everyone already knew she was and that her main man, Podesta, is a complete creep.

If that stuff had been published about a Republican instead, you would be all on board.

a reply to: TobyFlenderson

That's a good point. However, we know human nature. Power corrupts.

a reply to: dfnj2015

Like the products you think you buy from who?

Yeah, seriously!

Find a source better

Waaaaaaa! I can't!!!!!!!

That I can't, and nobody can, find a better source of REAL news than Wikileaks is why every society needs outlaws of some kind of or another. Somehow, some of them at least, keep us honest.

Julian Assange is a sort of Robin Hood of the digital age. And one has to acknowledge him as a profoundly clever chap, whatever his kinks might happen to be, and irrespective of whether he is a "traitor" (I don't think he identifies with any nationality. Good for him.)

a reply to: dfnj2015

Agreed, which is why I'm so in support of Wikileaks at this time. For the record, I didn't vote for Trump. But, at least for now, Assange and Wikileaks has the guts to "Speak Truth to Power." To me this is very much needed in the current state of affairs.

The MSM only reports on what they want people outraged about and/or arguing over. Wikileaks has been in the news quite a lot here recently hasn't it? I wonder if they're a part of the agenda that the MSM wants us focused on?

Take that as you will but the MSM doesn't report on things they don't want us to know about.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

The MSM has only mentioned Wikileaks

Real journalism starts with TEEC

THEORY
E1-3
Conclusion

Today we get Wikileaks leaked some things
It's Russia

Why haven't we discussed as a whole the contents?

And why haven't we asked more of our elected officials?

We are to blame just as they are/two each their own

a reply to: iWontGiveUP

They've had entire news segments about Wikileaks and the information they've released, they've done more than just "mention" them.

a reply to: 3NL1GHT3N3D1

Sorry that came off horribly

Why didn't those leaks lead to anything?

There was A LOT there?

And nothing?