It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Breaking Rumor - Three White House staffers have been identified for leaking classified info

page: 1
13
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:14 PM
link   
Another credible source is announcing that 3 staff people in the White House have been positively identified as leakers of classified material !

The names have reportedly been given to the Office of Government Ethics.

This is from a "reporter" for the One American News Network.

Could it true?

BUSTED! Trump catches 3 leakers (they’re in BIG trouble)

For President Donald Trump, loyalty is key.

And the question of whom within his administration has been revealing information to the press has been weighing on his mind since the press obtained insider details.

But now there are reports that he has finally gotten to the bottom of it, and is ready to take action.

Trey Yingst, chief White House correspondent for the One American News Network tweeted an inside scoop Monday that three sources have been identified and Trump is prepared to punish them.






posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:28 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

GOOD.



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:29 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

If true, I hope he throws the book at them.

There will be some busy lawyers soon.

mg



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:31 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

This would be great except for that would drop it to maybe 97% in the swamp. We can hope but do you think these leaks will ever stop?



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:31 PM
link   
Who is the one leaking about the three leakers?

One of the three leakers would not leak about themselves would they?



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: randomthoughts12
a reply to: xuenchen

This would be great except for that would drop it to maybe 97% in the swamp. We can hope but do you think these leaks will ever stop?



It takes time to bust open a well planned Operation Gladio.




posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:35 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

My sources tell me that it was 3 recently hired house keeping staff that were the leaks.

Their names are;
Helenary Clintonstein
Florak Flobama
Billiam Clintonberg



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:38 PM
link   
That may be good news I just wish they could wait for once to have a real story to run. "Breaking Rumor" - the new normal for all of the media I guess. 90% of the time these things fizzle and disappear when they're upstaged by the next Breaking Whatever that hits the news.



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:42 PM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy


I apologize for blaming Andy, the cook.

Serving the President well-done Prime Rib, smothered in ketchup made him a suspect, in my mind.



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:44 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Holy crap...The article has a NAMED source...Wait...This isn't journalism. We can't trust this...How? The freaking source has a name...That's just not how it's done!



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Deny Arrogance

I assume he used a either misinformation or limited the amount of people told something. Either that or just beefed up his security and made sure those in charge were loyal. Least that's the options I would look into it I was him.



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:50 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen


Since Democrats are focused more on our amazing President than they are with taking care of their own affairs, predictable reactions are already coming in.

"Trump will be firing these 3 supposed leakers, to distract from the chaos and turmoil that's tearing the White House staff apart."

(Interestingly the source article where I read this is now showing a 404 - page not found)
unitedstates.com...



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:50 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

But you've said the information didn't come from any legitimate sources remember? The news agencies make it up. Nameless sources means the info is FAKE. Your stance if not your exact words.
It's fake.

So umm I'm kind of confused. If there are Whitehouse leakers then the info being printed or aired must be true. Right?

Can't have this both ways you know.

Or is the Whitehouse staff in the business of pushing fake news?



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: xuenchen

Holy crap...The article has a NAMED source...Wait...This isn't journalism. We can't trust this...How? The freaking source has a name...That's just not how it's done!


Right? I call bigly bull on this, it fits no known pattern!




posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:53 PM
link   
First guess - Reince Priebus.



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:53 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: xuenchen

But you've said the information didn't come from any legitimate sources remember? The news agencies make it up. Nameless sources means the info is FAKE. Your stance if not your exact words.
It's fake.

So umm I'm kind of confused. If there are Whitehouse leakers then the info being printed or aired must be true. Right?

Can't have this both ways you know.

Or is the Whitehouse staff in the business of pushing fake news?


Well I am assuming that if these people were willing to commit a felony to leak info to make Trump look bad, they probably wouldn't be above making stuff up.

But what they leaked could have been 100% true.

Either way, I hope they throw the book at them.



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: carewemust
a reply to: DBCowboy


I apologize for blaming Andy, the cook.

Serving the President well-done Prime Rib, smothered in ketchup made him a suspect, in my mind.


I said it was Lee Daniels the butler.

The butler always did it...


PS. Did someone really put ketchup on prime rib? Blasphemous..
edit on 5232017 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: underpass61
That may be good news I just wish they could wait for once to have a real story to run. "Breaking Rumor" - the new normal for all of the media I guess. 90% of the time these things fizzle and disappear when they're upstaged by the next Breaking Whatever that hits the news.


Gotta agree with you here.

I am tired of rumors and anonymous sources.

I will believe this when I see proof.



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:57 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Haha! Breaking rumor! Great title.

There should be breaking rumor forum instead of breaking news.

That forum would be filled to the brim



posted on May, 23 2017 @ 05:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: RickyD
a reply to: xuenchen

Holy crap...The article has a NAMED source...Wait...This isn't journalism. We can't trust this...How? The freaking source has a name...That's just not how it's done!


No. Did you not read it? It does not have a named source.



new topics

top topics



 
13
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join