posted on May, 21 2017 @ 02:16 PM
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Well, I know psychology from all around the world... sure slapping a mechanism unknown patch on something also in those seeking to study and
understand what is occurring also taken as unknown? Is an attempt at "Normalcy" a known impossible derivative every mind is not a 98.6 in degrees of
knowledge or understanding.
Did the OP say she was unstable in anyway shape or form? No. He said in her line of work and interest which is encountering this sort of thing as an
unknown variable. Unknown as to the what in Western Psychiatry; yet known in the Eastern.
Can such a thing become dangerous? Sure; in one thing: Attachment.
All mental concepts and grasping is contact with phenomena; the labels are not the phenomena... just a placeholder of a known construct as an X. Such
is the nature of "one dimensional" thinking in a world that is always 3 dimensional despite undulations and quantum entanglements... the Y and Z are
The Y and Z are the research... yet snapping fingers or setting an alarm brings many out of what appears as a reality just as real on waking.
Attachment to this mental internal/external construct by name and label builds these internal and external constructs as a reality as existent, they
are not in any essence real except in collusion or communication as existent.
So close your eyes as a small child and crawl... no pain not nothing just ambulation or movement coming into contact. Who discerns this contact as
this that or the other? Those already attached to that as a reality. But that is the dream or pseudo reality that causes all mental illness the
conceptual ladder and the groping at it some try to find connections and rungs that exist and can see that others declare do not.
So who is wrong? This very question is exactly why Jehovah witnesses or peer reviewed research exists. The conspiracy or illusion of is this the real
life? Or reality in general?
In functioning in that conceptual ladder called knowledge? Yes. But in life itself? Such nonsense is not required for anything or everything to go
on... typically such a state is known as death. In some traditions? It is known as transcendence or stepping out of the conceptual ladder of the two
trees by stopping grasping, once enough is known to live. Then what needs to be said is simply said... out of the grove in which the Buddha attained
enlightenment? The first he ran across asked him what he was... he said awake. Meaning not asleep just acting according to nature... it is assumed he
was a human meeting another human... he could have been a bird meeting another bird, a snake meeting another snake etc etc who would know and who
Those grasping at the conceptual ladder as reality and as the only tangible existence to understand and know? Are defined very one thing:
If you claim it again from this post? Then I clearly can understand why; even if you cannot.