Did The DNC Help Hillary Clinton Beat Bernie Sanders? Fraud Lawsuit Takes Aim

September 5, 2017

Get a load of this! Hillary Clinton says that Bernie Sanders is "not a Democrat". She also says that Bernie's behavior is what led to candidate Trump calling her, "Crooked Hillary".

www.mlive.com...

OMG..Hillary really wants this "What Happened To Me?" book to sell badly doesn't she!

a reply to: Flatfish

There is no solid proof yet, just studies that suggest that there could have been millions of illegal votes.
The point of the investigation initiated by Trump is to get to the bottom of the issue and determine once and for all the extent of illegal votes. That states are xping their best not to cooperate is supicious.

originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: burntheships

The DNC has the right to rig things however they wish. And they did.

They took money from Bernie Sanders supporters under the pretense that the primary was fair. It wasn't fair. That's the basis of a fraud lawsuit right there. We have solid evidence that the DNC was never going to allow Sanders to win, so anyone who gave them money hoping to get Sanders elected has a claim of being defrauded.

OTOH, the Republican primary actually was fair. It was & still is painfully obvious that establishment Republicans don't like Trump. But he won the primary, so they accepted him as their candidate.

a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Voting isn't supposed to be fair.

originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Voting isn't supposed to be fair.

Tell the DNC that and while your at it you may want to suggest they change their bylaws to remove the portions that require their primaries be fair and free from influence by DNC leadership.

originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Voting isn't supposed to be fair.

Then they should stop complaining about voter registration.

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: burntheships

did they have a legal duty to be impartial

Perhaps.

But a "moral duty" may have more impact.

The way it turned out, it looks like the RNC had an easier time accepting the voters' wishes (who rejected the main stream Republican Candidates).

Well it's not like they didn't get caught rigging the primaries for the two previous elections.

originally posted by: Abysha
a reply to: burntheships

I think this is why Trump saw a strange kinship with Bernie. Both the GOP and DNC tried this but Trump didn't mind getting dirty to fight back.

Sanders was just too nice to attack Hillary like Trump attacked the other candidates. He invited a positive movement instead when he needed an angry one like Trump created.

Nothing more positive and upbeat than stealing from Your neighbor.

originally posted by: Xcathdra

originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: AndyFromMichigan

Voting isn't supposed to be fair.

Tell the DNC that and while your at it you may want to suggest they change their bylaws to remove the portions that require their primaries be fair and free from influence by DNC leadership.

The political process itself subverts fairness. Voting is merely a formality.

You probably wouldn't be surprised to find out that I'm against the idea of primaries.

originally posted by: jkm1864

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: burntheships

did they have a legal duty to be impartial

Perhaps.

But a "moral duty" may have more impact.

The way it turned out, it looks like the RNC had an easier time accepting the voters' wishes (who rejected the main stream Republican Candidates).

Well it's not like they didn't get caught rigging the primaries for the two previous elections.

It's not ?